Breaking News
News & Analysis

Intel Quark Runs on Roof, Raises Questions

9/10/2013 03:36 PM EDT
24 comments
NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 3
alex_m1
User Rank
CEO
Re: Must be 32 bit
alex_m1   9/11/2013 10:38:07 AM
NO RATINGS
GSMD , very interesting post.


Could you please tell a bit about where mcaffee security is relative to to other software stacks?

sw guy
User Rank
Manager
Re: Is it really more secure?
sw guy   9/11/2013 6:43:58 AM
NO RATINGS
Of course you can be secure with other CPU, too. As an example, why is ARM used inside chip+PIN card reader ?

I do not want to say using Quark was a bad decision, just that public justification may differ from actual one.

alex_m1
User Rank
CEO
Is it really more secure?
alex_m1   9/11/2013 5:10:20 AM
NO RATINGS
At least according to a few software engineers I asked about this subject, symantec and wind river doesn't offer something unique security-related. It's mostly branding. I wonder if this is the only benefit for this chip, or are there others planned?

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Must be 32 bit
rick merritt   9/10/2013 5:08:02 PM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
Chatting with fave analysts Kevin Krewell and David Kanter in the IDF media room I realize Quark must be 32 bit. There's just no need for 64-bit addressing in IoT for a loooooong time.

<<   <   Page 3 / 3
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
EE Times Senior Technical Editor Martin Rowe will interview EMC engineer Kenneth Wyatt.
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll