Breaking News
News & Analysis

Researcher Eyes Display on Contact Lens

10/8/2013 12:56 PM EDT
17 comments
NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 5 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Mott01
User Rank
Author
Re: cool idea
Mott01   10/8/2013 5:12:01 PM
NO RATINGS
Induction, perhaps?

Caleb Kraft
User Rank
Author
Re: cool idea
Caleb Kraft   10/8/2013 4:23:28 PM
NO RATINGS
Ben Krasnow sandwiched a coil between contact lenses and powered an LED while wearing it... in his GARAGE!

 

Check out the video, it is insane.

krisi
User Rank
Author
Re: cool idea
krisi   10/8/2013 3:33:34 PM
NO RATINGS
easier said than done ;-)

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Author
Re: cool idea
Sheetal.Pandey   10/8/2013 3:24:57 PM
NO RATINGS
Actually many innovations can be done on contact lenses its jusf one has to thinkover and keep on challengng.

krisi
User Rank
Author
Re: cool idea
krisi   10/8/2013 3:16:01 PM
NO RATINGS
Yeah, I know energy harvesting would be the best...but where do you put it? most harvesters require space, likely energy to be harvested is proportional to the volume of the harvester (or its surface)

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: cool idea
rick merritt   10/8/2013 2:50:07 PM
NO RATINGS
@Krisi: An integrated micro battery and/or energy harvester of course. Ambitious, I know!

krisi
User Rank
Author
cool idea
krisi   10/8/2013 1:35:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Cool idea...but how do you get energy to power the electronic contact lenses?

<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed