Breaking News
News & Analysis

Metrology: The Turtle of Engineering

10/14/2013 06:00 AM EDT
8 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Threaded | Newest First | Oldest First
Caleb Kraft
User Rank
Blogger
like nasa
Caleb Kraft   10/14/2013 11:31:28 AM
NO RATINGS
That's interesting. I hadn't really thought about this from a callibration standpoint. It reminds me of the way NASA handles hardware.

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Blogger
Re: like nasa
MeasurementBlues   10/14/2013 1:44:46 PM
NO RATINGS
"I hadn't really thought about this from a callibration standpoint." What do mean by "this"? Are you referrng to long-lived equipment when the parts are unavailable.?

Caleb Kraft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: like nasa
Caleb Kraft   10/14/2013 1:57:02 PM
NO RATINGS
I was referring to new equipment (less than 10 years) being "unproven" as per the first paragraph. With how quickly tech advances I hadn't really thought about some of the slower sides. 

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Blogger
Re: like nasa
MeasurementBlues   10/14/2013 2:29:15 PM
NO RATINGS
@Caleb, It's really when you're dealing with analog equipment. You can also substitute "unpredictable" for unproven. See Go inside Fluke's electrical metrology lab, from my visit there in 2012.

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Blogger
Re: like nasa
MeasurementBlues   10/14/2013 1:47:15 PM
NO RATINGS
@Caleb, There is another issue relating to NASA and the military regarding calibration. These organizations have their own promary standards and calibratin procedures. There is debate in the calibration community about NIST traceability and is it necessary in some circumstances. In other words, should one accept measurement that may not be NIST traceable?

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
the importance of calibration
DrQuine   10/14/2013 10:32:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Many people believe that modern digital equipment makes the need for calibration obsolete. They are wrong. I recently found a "currently calibrated" digital (long stem) thermometers that was reading 24.0 °F high, a digital logging thermometer that required a 13.0 °F offset to read correctly, and a digital scale that was reading 25 pounds off (on a 75 pound scale). If your team starts questioning instrument calibrations, push back.  If the measurement is worth making, it is worth making it correctly.

prabhakar_deosthali
User Rank
CEO
Re:
prabhakar_deosthali   10/15/2013 12:10:39 PM
NO RATINGS
As long the sensors are analog, and the component values get affected by the ambient conditions , there will be need for calibration. However the reference equipment itself is subject to periodic calibration for which some absolute reference standards are required in the test and measurement lab.

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Blogger
Re:
MeasurementBlues   2/24/2014 4:55:26 PM
NO RATINGS
For most calibrations to ahve any value, they need to be traceable to a national lab such as NIST (US), NPL (UK), or NRC (Canada). National lbas provide uncertaintly and confidence levels for equipment they calibrate. The equipment calibrated at a national las isusually a transfer standard that is then used to calibrate. equipment in a working lab.

See Follow the Chain to NIST-Traceable Calibrations

August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.