Breaking News
News & Analysis

Vibrator Brings Buzz to Wearables

Inside the tech and business
10/14/2013 08:40 AM EDT
8 comments
NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 2 / 2
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Author
Long-Distance Intimacy
R_Colin_Johnson   10/14/2013 10:25:58 AM
NO RATINGS
A very tasteful portrayal of a delicate subject. Thanks. 

Caleb Kraft
User Rank
Author
His parents
Caleb Kraft   10/14/2013 11:51:32 AM
NO RATINGS
When will his parents find out? What publications do they read?

prabhakar_deosthali
User Rank
Author
Re:
prabhakar_deosthali   10/14/2013 12:26:11 PM
NO RATINGS
This looks to be a sequel to phone sex.

The hacker community have an interesting challenge to break-in such devices.

er-IC
User Rank
Author
Potential M&A target?
er-IC   10/14/2013 1:27:34 PM
. .  for Silicon Motion?

patrick.mannion
User Rank
Author
Teardown? Motor control
patrick.mannion   10/14/2013 1:46:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Definitely worth a closer look. Ie: type of motor, vibration control algorithms and power optimization and control would be interesting. Maybe do a teardown, Rick?

 

daleste
User Rank
Author
Re: Teardown? Motor control
daleste   10/14/2013 8:10:49 PM
NO RATINGS
I guess the description already gave away everything the teardown would show.  I think user feedback may be more interesting...

DrQuine
User Rank
Author
Re: Teardown? Motor control
DrQuine   10/14/2013 10:22:26 PM
NO RATINGS
This device sounds like a perfect application for wireless recharging since that way the device can be permanently sealed and easily sanitized.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: Teardown? Motor control
rick merritt   10/16/2013 4:30:42 AM
NO RATINGS
Agreed! Perfect device for wireless recharging. I wonder how it does it now?

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed