Design Con 2015
Breaking News
News & Analysis

Is ARM Adopting Microsoft Model?

10/28/2013 08:30 AM EDT
5 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Margiemarg
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Interesting
Margiemarg   11/4/2013 9:42:28 AM
NO RATINGS
Whether they are adopting or no for me they aims nothing but to provide quality and effective advantages to users. - Marla Ahlgrimm

Caleb Kraft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Interesting
Caleb Kraft   10/29/2013 12:42:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Whatever they are doing, they can't possibly be as confusing as the microsoft licensing program. When it comes to software licenses, microsoft has so many variations you need a sherpa to guide you through it.

Kinnar
User Rank
CEO
Where XMOS will stand in this modification?
Kinnar   10/28/2013 1:24:13 PM
NO RATINGS
So I think XMOS might have purchased Architectural license. And then after modifying the design, making it capable of multicore and with other interfaces, if they sale the modified design to product manufacturers, what will be the charging pattern between XMOS, ARM and Product Manufacture? Does ARM licensing model allowing selling of the core? Will Product Manufactures have to pay to both ARM and XMOS? I hope there will be one more licensing model supporting this kind of modifications. I am sorry if I have kept too many questions here, but they are from a technical mind with less number of legal thoughts.

LarryM99
User Rank
CEO
Re: Interesting
LarryM99   10/28/2013 1:20:47 PM
NO RATINGS
I would bet that there are a variety of terms for ARM cores out there, given the time period over which ARM has been operating and their relative negotiating strength. It might even be possible that Intel still has some of the agreement in place from DEC's license to produce the StrongARM architecture. It makes you wonder how things might have been different if Intel had not snubbed that path.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Interesting
rick merritt   10/28/2013 11:37:13 AM
NO RATINGS
I am still wrapping my head around ARM's licensing parctices.

I believe they sell general licneses to use their cores, then charge royalties per core shipped. They also sell licenses to physical IP that helps implement the cores in a given node and architecturall icneses if you want to customize a core design.

I suspect there may be a few other wrinkles in the ARM busienss model I am still coming up to speed on.

Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week