Breaking News
View Comments: Threaded | Newest First | Oldest First
zewde yeraswork
User Rank
Blogger
design
zewde yeraswork   12/12/2013 9:18:03 AM
NO RATINGS
It actually makes a fair amount of sense that a chip design company could benefit from the end of the era of packing as many transistors as possible onto the chip, given that that necessarily means more innovation in other areas are chip design. Of course, he has an interest in saying that Broadcomm is going to come out on top of the situation regardless.

TarraTarra!
User Rank
CEO
Re: design
TarraTarra!   12/12/2013 3:05:42 PM
NO RATINGS
This does level the playing field a bit. Design innovation is where companies will have to distinguish themselves. The best, most efficient design shall survive rather than the design on the latest process node.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Dealing with the slowdown
rick merritt   12/12/2013 11:18:07 AM
NO RATINGS
How are you dealing with the rising cost/function at 20nm and beyond (with double patterning)?

 

krisi
User Rank
CEO
Re: Dealing with the slowdown
krisi   12/12/2013 12:19:04 PM
NO RATINGS
I am just not going down there ;-)...

chipmonk0
User Rank
CEO
Re: Dealing with the slowdown
chipmonk0   12/12/2013 12:42:50 PM
NO RATINGS
the free lunch is over for the fabless wonders ? can't keep making those huge profit w/o device R&D anymore ?

TarraTarra!
User Rank
CEO
Re: Dealing with the slowdown
TarraTarra!   12/12/2013 3:02:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Isnt it more of a problem for the companies with fabs? Process node advantage will not provide the benefits as before and the cost of sustaining new fabs increasing.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Dealing with the slowdown
junko.yoshida   12/12/2013 3:41:50 PM
NO RATINGS
@TarraTarra! I think you're right. It will be problematic for foundries who need new nodes to keep differentiating their services and charge premiums..

Or_Bach
User Rank
Rookie
Life After Moore's Law
Or_Bach   12/12/2013 6:10:36 PM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
Yes, it is clear thar cost per transistor is not going down with dimension scaling, but new type of scaling - monolithic 3D - would keep Moore's Law in the near future. Samsung is already doing so with 3D NAND and other are moving toward monolithic 3D just as well. The first adaption of monolithic 3D is in the memory segment, and other segment will follow, as we just recently learned whith Qualcomm sign up with CEA Leti. In a recent Blog we articulated why Scaling makes monolithic 3D IC practical http://electroiq.com/blog/2013/10/scaling-makes-monolithic-3d-ic-practical/, and in our site we present the cost and othe benifits the monolithic 3d technology provides - http://www.monolithic3d.com/3d-ic-edge1.html

moloned
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Life After Moore's Law
moloned   12/13/2013 7:47:19 AM
NO RATINGS
3D is interesting but even TSVs are too expensive for many applications

Most volume applications use die-stacking in package and wire-bonding for stacked DDR

Going 3D rather than TSV or wire-bonding means you have a huge heat problem and this may prove as much of a limitation as the number of Si atoms in the channel

Samueli who is a brilliant engineer is quite correct that 28nm will be the most cost effective node and few applications will be able to justify going below

For those that do the volumes will have to be huge and the platforms will be programmable so essentially you'll be talking about a commodity SoC business a bit like DRAM is today

Bill Dally's work on ELM at Stanford and now on Echelon at Nvidia charts how this will be possible and programmable solutions will get to between 1.5 and 3x ASIC

The big issue will be how to program these chips efficiently to approach these limits

As proebsting's law notes you can't rely on compilers to deliver the benefits

So SW engineers will have to work for a living instead of relying on Moore's law for a free ride

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: Dealing with the slowdown
rick merritt   12/12/2013 5:55:14 PM
@Tarra: Fabs like TSMC are just starting to ramp up really expensive (profitable) 3-D stacking processes.

In the future they may not be able to charge the premiumjs for 28nm, 16nm they charge today, but then they will not have the enormous expenditures of new multibillion dollar fabs every 18 monthys either. The biz dynamics will shift radically.

Imagine what that might  be like!

TarraTarra!
User Rank
CEO
Re: Dealing with the slowdown
TarraTarra!   12/15/2013 6:02:01 AM
NO RATINGS
@rick

"In the future they may not be able to charge the premiumjs for 28nm, 16nm they charge today, but then they will not have the enormous expenditures of new multibillion dollar fabs every 18 monthys either. The biz dynamics will shift radically.

Imagine what that might  be like!"

 

Yes - what egalitarian dreams! I can only imagine the large swaths of un-washed masses storming the bastile. Cake (FinFet) for everyone! 

chipmonk0
User Rank
CEO
Re: Dealing with the slowdown
chipmonk0   12/13/2013 12:16:17 AM
as the R&D cost incurred by the leading Foundry to keep up with Intel shoots up, that cost is bound to get xferred to their Fabless customers, cutting into their huge margin up to now. this is what I had meant as "the free lunch is over for the fabless wonders"

zewde yeraswork
User Rank
Blogger
Moore's Law
zewde yeraswork   12/13/2013 1:29:54 PM
NO RATINGS
I just spoke with a technologist at a leading OEM and server design company who says Moore's Law ended about ten years and claims to have predicted the end about twelve years ago...whether or not that's true, it seems everyone is finally accepting that the days of packing more transistors and getting a denser and denser product are nearing an end--albeit slowly....

Susan Rambo
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Moore's Law
Susan Rambo   12/13/2013 2:34:48 PM
NO RATINGS
Now people are fighting over who predicted Moore's Law would end? It would be good to have a timeline of predictions, just for fun.

Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
EE Times editor Junko Yoshida grills two executives --Rick Walker, senior product marketing manager for IoT and home automation for CSR, and Jim Reich, CTO and co-founder at Palatehome.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed