Breaking News
News & Analysis

What's a 6-in-1 Oscilloscope, Anyway?

2/8/2014 06:00 AM EST
14 comments
NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
x4
User Rank
Author
MDO3000
x4   2/12/2014 10:24:29 AM
NO RATINGS
The model is MDO3000 and the extra instrument is a Protocol analyzer.

http://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/new-6-in-1-scope-from-tektronix/

dgreigml1
User Rank
Author
Well, you did ask for comments (guessing is messy, all ends in tears etc).
dgreigml1   2/10/2014 7:36:44 PM
NO RATINGS
SNR > 72dB across full BW, channel isolation the same.

Battery power facility, runtime > 60min.

Isolation > 4kV and < 1pF across full BW.

Full set of Diff FET probes and 50ohm probes included in the price.

Linux OS, Open source drivers chucked in.

No problem with "pop up ads", but been 'nixing' for a couple of decades, such is life.

 

zeeglen
User Rank
Author
Re: Seems to be everywhere
zeeglen   2/10/2014 4:49:22 PM
NO RATINGS
Since it could be a spectum analyzer it might include an RF sweep generator, and an arbitrary function generator instead of a plain old function generator.

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Author
Seems to be everywhere
MeasurementBlues   2/10/2014 9:59:21 AM
NO RATINGS
I clicked on "Post a comment" and an ad appeared for this scope. Looks like there is no escape.

<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed