Breaking News
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
rick merritt
User Rank
Blogger
Do you still believe in EUV?
rick merritt   2/25/2014 1:51:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Looks like a case of Herculean efforts but modest progress to me.

resistion
User Rank
Manager
Re: Do you still believe in EUV?
resistion   2/25/2014 4:10:18 PM
NO RATINGS
Just looking at the data it's not revived EUV hope but continuing reality.

JimMcGregor
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Do you still believe in EUV?
JimMcGregor   2/25/2014 7:07:20 PM
NO RATINGS
Rick, I would agree. The process is gaining in complexity and while EUV still holds potential, the feasibility of the technology remains in question.

resistion
User Rank
Manager
Re: Do you still believe in EUV?
resistion   2/25/2014 7:48:40 PM
NO RATINGS
At SPIE 2008, TSMC published a paper which talked about shot noise for the different lithography technologies and its impact on CD uniformity. EUV already had trouble in this area at 30 nm, so for the 20 nm size applications, it would have a prohibitive impact on minimum dose requirements, as that would drive up the source power requirement many times beyond the currently already difficult-to-reach target level.

The paper title is "Influence of Shot Noise on CDU with DUV, EUV, and E-Beam"

yangcoloy
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Do you still believe in EUV?
yangcoloy   2/26/2014 2:30:37 AM
NO RATINGS
EUV feels like the old 157nm. However, as there is not an innovation like water immersion yet.

zewde yeraswork
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Do you still believe in EUV?
zewde yeraswork   2/26/2014 9:32:15 AM
NO RATINGS
EUV is an interesting avenue for making chips faster and smaller and dealing with the upcoming end to Moore's Law, but it's far from a sure thing that's true.

rick merritt
User Rank
Blogger
7nm without EUV
rick merritt   2/26/2014 10:49:18 AM
NO RATINGS
That was the title of a panel at the SPIE Litho conference in San Jose last nite: "7nm without EUV"

If anyone went, I'd love to hear a digest of what was said. In any case, what do you think are the viable options?

HankWalker
User Rank
Manager
193i + E-beam?
HankWalker   2/26/2014 12:59:55 PM
NO RATINGS
What about 193i (or nanoimprint as used in disk drives) to form parallel lines and e-beam to cut them and form vias? TSMC has a Mapper prototype system. David Lam is targeting Multibeam for this purpose, rather than rastering a mask, since it has much relaxed overlay/resolution/writing speed requirements compared to rastering the whole wafer.

157 died since it was a lot of investment for relatively little gain in process capability. EUV may start to be in that position, unless it can demonstrate significant capability improvement or cost reduction at the time it would be inserted.

 

wilber_xbox
User Rank
CEO
Re: 7nm without EUV
wilber_xbox   2/26/2014 1:04:27 PM
NO RATINGS
Rick, the only viable option right now is multi-patterning solution. Ofcourse the cost will be very high and the challenges immense but some top level executive would want to make it a marketing sucess.

wilber_xbox
User Rank
CEO
Re: Do you still believe in EUV?
wilber_xbox   2/26/2014 1:07:37 PM
NO RATINGS
We should look beyound the lithography tool solutions. We should modify the design rule and make relatively simple chips. I think we have already missed the deadline on 7nm EUV with the current source power.

Page 1 / 3   >   >>
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
Join our online Radio Show on Friday 11th July starting at 2:00pm Eastern, when EETimes editor of all things fun and interesting, Max Maxfield, and embedded systems expert, Jack Ganssle, will debate as to just what is, and is not, and embedded system.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week