Breaking News
News & Analysis

Embedded V2X Systems Hinge on US Regulations

3/13/2014 02:00 PM EDT
6 comments
NO RATINGS
1 saves
More Related Links
View Comments: Threaded | Newest First | Oldest First
Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
Expecting knee-jerk opposition
Bert22306   3/13/2014 6:13:11 PM
NO RATINGS
I would expect those with a libertarian stance to instantly oppose any such mandates, but this is not so different from the sorts of regulations governments have had to impose from day 1. Consider just lighting requirements for vehicles. Early cars were lucky to have a kerosene lamp strapped on one side. Or check out how practically invisible the tail lights of even some 1950s cars can be. Never mind visibility from the side, which was zero.

To impose RF comms between cars is not such a stretch, when governments have been imposing optical spectrum specs between cars, for very similar reasons, for decades. Just an evolution of the same requirements.

chanj0
User Rank
Manager
Early Adaption?
chanj0   3/13/2014 7:31:56 PM
NO RATINGS
V2V is one of the hot topics and innovation areas in the coming years. There are a lot of benefit of V2X communication. Safety will likely be improved. In addition, traffic condition can be communicated to the vehicle position system/ driving system to guide driverless algorithm. These are just a few of the many possibility and the current development is far from mature. I wonder why government wants to impose regulation so soon. Are they going to invest so that the technology grows faster?

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Early Adaption?
junko.yoshida   3/13/2014 9:28:05 PM
NO RATINGS
chanj, the government agency has been "investigating" V2X issues for almost a decade. They have not been so forthcoming until now -- largely because a lot of testing they had to do , but more because of some oppositions (as Bert mentioned as "knee-jerk" reactions)

V2V, or Car-to-Car, will happen; but V2I, or vehicle to infrastructure, will be slow because that requires the budget the state government is not willing to shell out. Under the current political climate in the United States, it will be hard.

 

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
DSRC + cellular communication
junko.yoshida   3/13/2014 9:33:15 PM
NO RATINGS
The downside of the government agency taking a sweet time in testing a new scheme like V2X is that while they are engaged in testing, the technology advances by leaps and bounds.

For example, DSRC is a good technology. But considering that every car will soon to have a modem technology (to get connected with services like GM OnStar) or every driver will have a cell phone brought inside a car, the architecture of V2X should consider how to integrate the power of cellular communication in the context of mandating DSRC. I don't think this has been tested or architected.

prabhakar_deosthali
User Rank
CEO
re:
prabhakar_deosthali   3/14/2014 2:37:40 AM
NO RATINGS
The time taken by govt agencies to introduce something in a safety critical  thing such as cars , is understandable.

 

The developers and the car companies want to push new technologies  to earn more money, push their share of market by using such innovative features . 

But the government bodies have to consider allaspects of the technology, its regulation, the possible misuse and  the legal angles and all that.

Susan Rambo
User Rank
Blogger
Does it work?
Susan Rambo   3/14/2014 8:13:07 AM
NO RATINGS
How specifically will this technology keep cars from crashing into each other?

Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
Join our online Radio Show on Friday 11th July starting at 2:00pm Eastern, when EETimes editor of all things fun and interesting, Max Maxfield, and embedded systems expert, Jack Ganssle, will debate as to just what is, and is not, and embedded system.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week