Breaking News
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
kunal87
User Rank
Rookie
Re: China will be at the top in MEMS manufacturing
kunal87   10/7/2015 2:31:23 AM
NO RATINGS
What was the revenue in 2014 for following companies;

1-Memsensing Microsystems Co. Ltd

2-Senodia Technologies Inc

3-Quality Sensor Technology Corporation (QST) 

Kinnar
User Rank
Author
Re: China will be at the top in MEMS manufacturing
Kinnar   3/26/2014 4:01:24 AM
NO RATINGS
One initiative of such kind is promotion of open source hardware and that is already started with a very good support from semiconductor giants like TI, but at the same time if companies collaborate more for proven sensors interfaces with controllers that will help designer to come with fast prototypes. Single company solutions like CapSense from Cypress Semiconductor is a well known example of a sensor interfacing solution, this kind of cross company solutions will be welcomed by the developers.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: China will be at the top in MEMS manufacturing
junko.yoshida   3/25/2014 10:31:07 AM
NO RATINGS
Agreed, Kinnar. So, in order to make what you described as "cross manufacturer clubbing of various sensors" possible, what does the industry exactly need to do? Or exactly what are still missing before we can make that happen?

Kinnar
User Rank
Author
Re: China will be at the top in MEMS manufacturing
Kinnar   3/25/2014 2:09:31 AM
NO RATINGS
Most of the microcontroller/sensors manufacturers are providing this support like TI, Freescale, Atmel etc. but cross manufacturer clubbing of various sensors is still a tough job for developers, although the open source hardware initiatives are adding a lot in this matter, but still these kind of hubs are essentially required.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: China will be at the top in MEMS manufacturing
junko.yoshida   3/25/2014 12:15:16 AM
NO RATINGS
Agreed, Kinnar. The sensor hubs will play a key role in actually penetration of MEMS in various IoT products.

Kinnar
User Rank
Author
China will be at the top in MEMS manufacturing
Kinnar   3/23/2014 5:21:47 AM
NO RATINGS
Chinese people are known for their produce-abilities, if one manufacturing line gets succeeded then Chinese entrepreneurs will flood their market with MEMS of different categories. Yes the first design and manufacturing like is quite complicated. 

Also the concept of MEMS Hub is very much essential in the interface-ability of MEMS and this concept will shorten the adaptability of the particular MEMS in existing designs.

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Author
Re: Disruptive Technology May Be A Path
Sheetal.Pandey   3/21/2014 7:06:02 AM
If Chinese government is supporting this move, it will defintely go a long way. And no one can deny strong position of China in electronics.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Disruptive Technology May Be A Path
junko.yoshida   3/21/2014 1:50:28 AM
NO RATINGS
@matt, thanks for the info. Yes, that's interesting. 

But the reason why Chinese companies are still in a catch-up mode is not necessarily the lack of technology. They can always license the technology from companies they think as their right partners. The issue is if the Chinese startups have enough stamina and patience to bring the technology to commercial products. 

Matt Schmidt
User Rank
Author
Disruptive Technology May Be A Path
Matt Schmidt   3/21/2014 1:39:10 AM
NO RATINGS
There are reports this week that GE will license a potentially disruptive mechanical switch implemented at MEMS scale for RF applications in mobile systems; http://gigaom.com/2014/03/18/ge-says-micro-machinery-is-the-key-to-more-efficient-smartphones-and-faster-4g-connections/

This might open a path to new players (even from China). 

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed