Breaking News
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Kinnar
User Rank
CEO
Re: No need for Dual OS
Kinnar   4/5/2014 2:20:19 AM
NO RATINGS
Support for Dual OS means one can change the OS based on need, other way round you can also say after purchasing the hardware you are free to choose which OS you want to use due to the multiple OS support. It does not specifically mean that it has two OS simultaneously running on one device or two OS installed on one device and dynamically used based on need.

goafrit
User Rank
Manager
Re: No need for Dual OS
goafrit   4/4/2014 5:40:46 PM
NO RATINGS
>> , for them multiple os support will be an attractive feature.

I do not see someone using his phone and in the middle will like to reboot or switch OS. If the option is between iOS and Android, maybe . But even with that, I do not seen the value. Most of the apps are in all the ecosystems.

Kinnar
User Rank
CEO
Re: No need for Dual OS
Kinnar   4/3/2014 2:22:29 AM
NO RATINGS
You are right for consumer market it will not be a good idea, but many smartphone users are technically sound users, for them multiple os support will be an attractive feature.

 

goafrit
User Rank
Manager
Re: No need for Dual OS
goafrit   4/2/2014 7:45:55 PM
NO RATINGS
Was very strange they even thought about it. In the enterprise, there is chance but in the consumer market, that is a bad idea. Yet, we need to see that some of these firms are looking for a simple differentiator in this crowded market. 

elctrnx_lyf
User Rank
Manager
Re: No need for Dual OS
elctrnx_lyf   3/25/2014 9:01:03 AM
NO RATINGS
Start in a day and stop on the next day. looks like the samart phone market is really becoming competetive.

LarryM99
User Rank
CEO
Re: No need for Dual OS
LarryM99   3/24/2014 3:40:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Sometimes a baby is so ugly that the kindest thing that you can do is to strangle it in it's crib. That pretty much sums up what I think of this idea.

AZskibum
User Rank
CEO
Re: No need for Dual OS
AZskibum   3/23/2014 1:42:50 PM
Agreed. When I first heard of this, I wondered why ordinary consumers would want or need 2 different operating systems on their phones. It was a smart move to drop this before sinking any more money into it.

Kinnar
User Rank
CEO
Re: No need for Dual OS
Kinnar   3/23/2014 5:38:24 AM
Very wise decision, there in no meaning of having dual OS phone, instead it is required to have an open hardware phone that can support to any OS, Android, Windows or IOS. One can select the OS of his choice and go ahead with the hardware available from the device manufacturer.

goafrit
User Rank
Manager
No need for Dual OS
goafrit   3/22/2014 5:54:56 AM
This makes sense as I do not see the value. Unless phones have become laptops, it is not common to be in the Android environment and one missing something to pick in the Windows. Windows is largely work related for Office, etc. So, this "kill" makes sense.

August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.