Breaking News
News & Analysis

Will SMIC Narrow Tech Gap?

'Perhaps, not with TSMC,' says SMIC CEO
3/27/2014 08:00 PM EDT
13 comments
NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 3 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
resistion
User Rank
CEO
Good motivation
resistion   3/28/2014 12:57:31 AM
NO RATINGS
A lot of motivation for SMIC to pull off 28 nm. Big market for a while.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Good motivation
junko.yoshida   3/28/2014 12:59:43 AM
NO RATINGS
@resistion, I think you are right. But for how long?

resistion
User Rank
CEO
Re: Good motivation
resistion   3/28/2014 1:13:04 AM
NO RATINGS
28 nm is a great "waiting" node, that's why it will support a big market.

baybal
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Good motivation
baybal   3/28/2014 1:48:25 AM
NO RATINGS
SMIC market position has definitely improved through post-crisis years. SMIC managed to weather the economic downturn and following waves of bankruptcies by entrenching themselves in stable niche markets (sensors) and generic 180nm+ service, something that TSMC were not interested in.

TSMC, on the other hand, made a possible error by putting all resources into 450mm/<40nm service that, after 5 year of development, has not reached the market. TSMC lost a sizeable portion of mainstream service market exactly because they were going towards <28nm too fast and trying to skip a node.

It was a wise decision on SMIC's part to stop chasing Taiwanese and to seek growth opportunities beyond TSMC dominated niches. While SMIC has no real way to compete with TSMC heads on in the high end VLSI/SoC sector, their current tactic is valid. SMIC is not out of risk zone yet, and they can be in red again the next year.

The competition in between SMIC and TSMC for mid-end sector seem to be already pushing prices and MOQs down. It will be interesting for me to see how much fab capacity SMIC's expansion will open to PRC's application processor market as it is crucial to PRC's domestic fabless brands (and to my income =).

double-o-nothing
User Rank
Rookie
14 nm
double-o-nothing   3/28/2014 10:53:43 AM
NO RATINGS
SMIC's next node is 14 nm in 2017 - it could skip all the double patterning nonsense if EUV is actually available at that time.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 14 nm
junko.yoshida   3/28/2014 3:54:50 PM
NO RATINGS
@double-o-nothing, so, you think SMIC could entirely skip the 20nm process?

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Good motivation
junko.yoshida   3/28/2014 3:59:36 PM
NO RATINGS
@baybal, it's interesting you say that it is wise for SMIC to stop chasing TSMC...I've heard others say that too. So far, that strategy is definitely working. The issue is what might happen three years from now...

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Good motivation
junko.yoshida   3/28/2014 4:05:33 PM
NO RATINGS
@baybal, you are also right about the strong demand from China's AP processor guys. Some of them are still using 40-nm process, but they are definitely moving toward 28nm. The question is, as you pointed out, SMIC's capacity.

T.Y. says, "With Beijing and Shanghai combined, our 28 nm capacity is 15,000 wafers per month."

Do you think that's enough?

baybal
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Good motivation
baybal   3/28/2014 8:09:54 PM
NO RATINGS
>@baybal, you are also right about the strong demand from
>China's AP processor guys.  Some of them are still using
>40-nm process, butthey are definitely ;moving toward 28nm.
>The question is, as you pointed out, SMIC's capacity.

>T.Y. says, "With Beijing and Shanghai combined, our 28 nm
>capacity is 15,000wafers per month."

>Do you think that's enough?

The question is not so much about SMIC's 28nm capacity, but about their total capacity that they can market to AP makers, which includes service on few generations old nodes. When bigger AP makers will move towards 28nm, they will free up a lot of capacity on 45nm which will become available to lower tier fabless companies (think Actions/Infotmics/AMLogic/Nufront).

If these second-tierers will no longer need to go across the straight for capacity, they will get a very very significant cost advantage. Most of mainland fabless have no problems lagging few nodes behind the market. For them, going below 65nm does not change a lot as they are constrained by MOQs more than by per chip costs.

>@baybal, it's interesting you say that it is wise for
>SMIC to stop chasing TSMC...I've heard others say
>that too. So far, that strategy is definitely working.
>The issue is what might happen three years from now...

It is unlikely that mainland fabless will need <28nm more than 45nm service in 3 years.

As you probably know, foundries give MOQs for wafers, and not for individual chips. You can make significantly more chips per wafer with 28nm than with 45nm, but you still need to reach the MOQ for wafers which will always be higher for a service on a node with higher market demand.

double-o-nothing
User Rank
Rookie
Re: 14 nm
double-o-nothing   3/28/2014 8:58:22 PM
NO RATINGS
They seem in no rush even for 28 but 14 nm is really a node marketing name. They could have called it 20.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
Join our online Radio Show on Friday 11th July starting at 2:00pm Eastern, when EETimes editor of all things fun and interesting, Max Maxfield, and embedded systems expert, Jack Ganssle, will debate as to just what is, and is not, and embedded system.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week