Breaking News
News & Analysis

GE Claims Fastest, Highest-Power MEMS Switch

3/28/2014 08:40 AM EDT
5 comments
NO RATINGS
1 saves
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
seaEE
User Rank
Author
Re: Break through
seaEE   4/6/2014 12:19:11 AM
Thomas Edison would be proud, as his spirit of inventiveness and innovation is still being carried forward. 

bart.plovie
User Rank
Author
Re: Break through
bart.plovie   4/3/2014 6:21:16 PM
First see, then believe. Claiming a device can switch a certain amount of power is a bit of a joke in my opinion unless you mention the test conditions, because certain manufacturers would *cough* never dare *cough* to dip their devices in liquid nitrogen for such tests.

_hm
User Rank
Author
Re: Break through
_hm   3/30/2014 8:51:28 AM
NO RATINGS
This product will have dual use. It can be very useful for defence electronics.

 

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Author
Re: Break through
R_Colin_Johnson   3/28/2014 5:56:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Many companies have been working on MEMS switches over the years--and some, like TeraVicta, have bit the dust--but if GE's MEMS switch works as advertised, their era could finally be here.

elctrnx_lyf
User Rank
Author
Break through
elctrnx_lyf   3/28/2014 5:02:38 PM
NO RATINGS
Sounds like a huge break through. This could pave way for low power high end phones in future.

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed