Breaking News
News & Analysis

DCD's (Good Old) 68HC08 MCU Is Going Strong

4/8/2014 12:40 PM EDT
7 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 6808 knock off
Max The Magnificent   4/22/2014 10:38:19 AM
NO RATINGS
@Etmax: ...so I can spend my twilight years in nostalgia :-)

I've never been there -- what's the weather like? LOL

I'm hoping to spend my twilight years in an alcoholic stupor LOL

Etmax
User Rank
Rookie
Re: 6808 knock off
Etmax   4/21/2014 10:05:59 PM
NO RATINGS
Thought I might add that probably Freescale's problem is that they produce a 1000 varieties for every possible market niche early on, and if you don't pick the recommended part that some automotive volume user has chosen, within a year or 2 it's deleted. With the MC68340->MC68341 we ended up using the MC68360 that was used in communication infrastructure and were assured 8 years of production.

Most other manufacturers develop parts based on market trends in key market segments and so have less pressure to cull.

Etmax
User Rank
Rookie
Re: 6808 knock off
Etmax   4/21/2014 10:00:09 PM
NO RATINGS
Yeah I know what you mean, the difference here was that they were new or recommended parts :-(

There's a great part that I used in a couple of projects back in the dim dark ages that I used to like called ICL8038. It was a square wave, triangle/sawtooth and sinewave generator with a sweep pin. I think it was used in every function generator of the time and it's gone EOL in the last couple of years so I bought 50 off eBay so I can spend my twilight years in nostalgia :-)

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 6808 knock off
Max The Magnificent   4/21/2014 12:06:56 PM
NO RATINGS
@Etmax: Need I add more?

No -- I think I get the idea -- I can only imagine how frustrating that must have been for you.

I know this isn't related, but it reminds me of projects in electronic hobby magazines -- many are constructed using whatever components happen to be in the author's "treasure chest of parts" -- with the result that no one else can find the (now-discontinued) parts.

Etmax
User Rank
Rookie
Re: 6808 knock off
Etmax   4/21/2014 12:02:20 PM
NO RATINGS
@Max "Tell me more!"

1. I designed a computer based on the all new MC68HC11E0 because they told me it was a new part that was a favoured line so I did the design and 6 months later the price went up. A further 6 months later it went EOL


2. I designed a system that used the MC68340 and 8 months into the development were told to switch to the MC68341 because that was going to be the mainstay in that line and after all of the drivers were rewritten and we had done the first pilot run they discontinued that one.

3. I designed an automotive product based on the MC68HC05K1 and 2 years later it was discontinued.

4. I designed a telephony line I/F based on the MC68HC05G2 and 2 years into the product run it was discontinued.

Need I add more?

In contrast I designed a small controller based on a PIC12C508 and now 15 years later I can still buy it.

I have a few dozen designs based on various Atmel parts and 10 years on the parts are still available or a pin AND SW compatible alternative is available

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 6808 knock off
Max The Magnificent   4/21/2014 9:46:01 AM
NO RATINGS
@Etmax: The number of times that Freescale has dicontinued something that I've designed in is actually shocking.

Tell me more!

Etmax
User Rank
Rookie
6808 knock off
Etmax   4/19/2014 5:09:05 AM
NO RATINGS
I Hope DCD is better than Freescale at retaining product lines. The number of times that Freescale has dicontinued something that I've designed in is actually shocking.

August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.