Design Con 2015
Breaking News
News & Analysis

Samsung Defense: Marketing Guru vs. Marketing Guru

4/19/2014 04:30 PM EDT
9 comments
< Previous Page 2 / 2
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
AZskibum
User Rank
CEO
Re: Cutting to the chase
AZskibum   4/22/2014 11:14:37 AM
NO RATINGS
Indeed, a lot of Apple products are purchased simply because they are Apple products. Existing Apple customers have experience with the quality, ease of use and elegant design for which Apple is famous. They trust Apple -- it's as simple as that.

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Manager
Re: Reasons for choosing samsung over iphone
Sheetal.Pandey   4/22/2014 4:01:07 AM
NO RATINGS
I am seriously thinking that patent engineering must be a separate discipline in Engineering schools or atelast students can opt for that as major elective. Its an interesting career.

wilber_xbox
User Rank
Manager
Re: Reasons for choosing samsung over iphone
wilber_xbox   4/22/2014 2:53:17 AM
NO RATINGS
Mike, then why Samsung and not any other android os...i know for sure that Sony or HTC phones are far better both in performancy and quality wrt Samsung. I thing Samsung used the inside information about iPhones to drive their sales of Galaxy phones. 

vixs
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Reasons for choosing samsung over iphone
vixs   4/21/2014 5:50:13 PM
NO RATINGS
Is that the reason why Apple hasn't announced a big screen phone yet?

Too bad, there is no patent for "bigger screen than yours".

mike.seiler
User Rank
Rookie
Reasons for choosing samsung over iphone
mike.seiler   4/21/2014 3:48:07 PM
NO RATINGS
I chose a samsung phone for the android os not because of any of the features in dispute.
That and the bigger screen. Funny how apple decided a bigger screen was important too.
I'd call that an admission that samsung was preferred for reasons other than the petty claims we see here now.

 

fdunn0
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Cutting to the chase
fdunn0   4/21/2014 1:14:55 PM
NO RATINGS
Exactly!

 

Apple also would go for a patent on the wheel if it could (and it may). Most all of these "features" were in one form or another available as prior art.

Apple neither cares about prior art or how much they have to spend on attorney's fees.

 

F. Dunn

DeeCee430
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Cutting to the chase
DeeCee430   4/21/2014 1:08:38 PM
NO RATINGS
When asked which features people were looking for in deciding which new cell phone to get, the salesperson at a local cell phone kiosk said the only question many young people asked was "which model is most popular?".

elctrnx_lyf
User Rank
Manager
Re: Cutting to the chase
elctrnx_lyf   4/21/2014 1:03:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Unless there is a real technology theft involved apple should drop these cases against samsung and should probably stick to their strength of developing innovative products.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
Cutting to the chase
Bert22306   4/20/2014 5:49:30 PM
NO RATINGS
Her application of the method demonstrated significant information skipping by her research subjects when making a smartphone choice and that major attributes drove the choices.

Yes, in fact, I hardly think this is debatable anymore, a lot of Apple products are purchased just because of the brand name. And the odd perception by some unfortunate people that owning an iPhone or iPad make them look cool. Or worse that even that, makes girls more attracted to them.

Talk about "information skipping"!

Most Recent Comments
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
EE Times Senior Technical Editor Martin Rowe will interview EMC engineer Kenneth Wyatt.
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll