Breaking News
News & Analysis

Qualcomm Preps IoT, IBM Upgrades Watson

5/16/2014 03:40 PM EDT
6 comments
NO RATINGS
2 saves
Page 1 / 2 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Anand.Yaligar
User Rank
Rookie
Re : Qualcomm Preps IoT, IBM Upgrades Watson
Anand.Yaligar   5/23/2014 7:42:57 AM
NO RATINGS
The position where right now the IOT stands in the global market has been summarized aptly in the form of 3 sentences spoken by Steve Mollenkopf. Chip making for the IOT is slow at the moment and QUALCOMM CEO understands it. However the direction where his company will go after IOT starts playing in the electronics supply chain will be governed by what business policies his company has adopted in the advent of IOT.

docdivakar
User Rank
Manager
Re: Qualcomm Preps IoT
docdivakar   5/20/2014 12:55:26 PM
NO RATINGS
Rick, while I realize TiECon is not the venue to go much more in-depth, I wish the Qualcomm exec had disclosed some info on the planned development of I-o-T Silicon. It seems to me that he could have addressed areas where Qualcomm intends make a distinction that the I-o-T devices need, such as:

1. Power management including enegy harvesting
2. More sensor integration with CMOS processes
3. Low power multi-band / multi-protocol radios, etc.

MP Divakar

alex_m1
User Rank
CEO
Re: Can you guess
alex_m1   5/19/2014 9:53:14 AM
NO RATINGS
Dr, those kinds of things might be an industry effort. And you can always start by creating a small set of examles that are aimed at what engineers think are "corner cases" and let developers work with that, it might take a long time to conquer those. Also defining some of those test cases might be done by non experts with minimal training, because humans are good at language.

 

 

There are also some kinds of tricks to gather examples, like google started with books which have been translated as data for theil translation algorithm.And  this is different than ASIC, in ASIC everything needs to work, here only some cases.

But yes, it's challenging and takes a long time.

 

 

DrFPGA
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Can you guess
DrFPGA   5/19/2014 9:33:28 AM
NO RATINGS
"You test this by creating a huge number of example sentences and their representations and testing how close watson got it."

Yep- the need to create a large number of example sentences to cover all of your application seems like a testing nightmare to me. It's like creating a large number of test packets to exercise your ethernet implementation. Takes years...

alex_m1
User Rank
CEO
Re: Can you guess
alex_m1   5/19/2014 5:08:34 AM
NO RATINGS
Dr, Watson is composed on many components each with each own testing and debugging methods. For example there's a part that break sentences to a data structure that represents meaning. You test this by creating a huge number of example sentences and their representations and testing how close watson got it.


Debugging : some parts of watson use machine learning. Machine learning themselfs are math algorithms so you debug them  at that level. But than if you setup the parameters incorrectly and you see weird results , you try another combination of parameters ,probably guided by machine learning theory.

I guess similar methods scale to the top levels of watson .

If you're interested in more details, there are some guys from watson on quora , usually answr questions.

DrFPGA
User Rank
Blogger
Can you guess
DrFPGA   5/18/2014 3:41:27 PM
NO RATINGS
what a testbench will look like to prove out a design on Watson? I can't...

Anyone know how to test and debug?

Top Comments of the Week
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for todays commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.
Flash Poll