Breaking News
News & Analysis

Superconductor Discovery Points to Energy-Efficient Power Transmission

NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Threaded | Newest First | Oldest First
DrFPGA
User Rank
Author
Very Clear
DrFPGA   5/27/2014 12:15:53 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanx for the excellent summary of superconductivity! Maybe there is a room temp combination here someplace...

Martini Tech
User Rank
Author
Re: Very Clear
Martini Tech   5/27/2014 12:31:04 PM
NO RATINGS
This guy here (http://superconductors.org/) is claiming to have candidates at 77C, but I do not know how much he can be reliable..  

wilber_xbox
User Rank
Author
Re: Very Clear
wilber_xbox   5/27/2014 1:12:07 PM
NO RATINGS
is it 77C or 77K or -77C?? Need little clarification as superconductor at 77C will be amazing.

DeeCee430
User Rank
Author
Re: Very Clear
DeeCee430   5/27/2014 1:16:40 PM
NO RATINGS
The article in http://www.superconductors.org/77C.htm says "77 Celsius (170F, 350K)"

DrFPGA
User Rank
Author
Re: Very Clear
DrFPGA   5/27/2014 1:44:02 PM
NO RATINGS
Avoid any kickstarter room-temp superconductor start-ups would be my advice...

Susan Rambo
User Rank
Author
Re: Very Clear
Susan Rambo   5/28/2014 1:40:06 AM
NO RATINGS
Good advice.

sixscrews
User Rank
Author
Re: Very Clear
sixscrews   5/27/2014 6:33:32 PM
NO RATINGS
To clarify the temperature issue, the article contains the line: "materials eventually become superconducting below roughly -400 degrees Fahrenheit."

-400 F ~ 33 K ~ -240 C

This is above the boiling temperature of liquid helium at 1 atmosphere (4.2K) but below the boiling temperature of liquid nitrogen (77 K ~ -196 C ~ -321 F). 

It's also below the boiling temperature of argon at 1 atm (87K).

So it's not quite as nifty a superconductor as the YBaCuO (Perovskite) discovered by Bednorz and Muller in 1986 and commercialized by a number of companies since then.  Some of the superconductors in this family can operate around 77 K (i.e., LN2 boiling temperature) but they work better at lower temperatures.

The YBaCuo and related materials have found uses as current leads in persistent DC magnets used in MRI machines and as mid-temperature (but still cryogenic) connectors in high energy physics magnets and they have also been applied as AC and DC power conductors, albeit over short hauls (hundreds to thousands of meters).

To date no company has managed to catch the golden ring of superconductors but an awful lot of money - private and Government - has gone into their development.

The Argonne work is significant in that it demonstrates the presence of a previously unrecognized magnetic phase in particular metallic compounds.  I do not read it as a significant step in superconductor work - there is a lot more to be done before the observed phenomenon can be commercialized - and it'a hard to see just what commercial products will result.

Related work lead to the development of GMR heads for magnetic storage media some 20-30 years ago - and serveral orders of magnitude increase in storage density of rotating media.

What's next?  Who knows - but, as another poster advised, stay away from Kickstarter projects promising room temperature superconductors....

ss/wb

DeeCee430
User Rank
Author
already in operation
DeeCee430   5/27/2014 12:51:14 PM
NO RATINGS
While the article says that superconductors are not currently used for power transmission lines, there are actually several already in operation.  However, they are fairly short:
  http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/182278-the-worlds-first-superconducting-power-line-paves-the-way-for-billions-of-dollars-in-savings
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holbrook_Superconductor_Project
  http://www.powerengineeringint.com/articles/print/volume-21/issue-5/features/superconductors-are-ready-to-relieve-urban-congestion.html



Les_Slater
User Rank
Author
Room temperature?
Les_Slater   5/27/2014 11:00:37 PM
NO RATINGS
I went to a presentation by Dr. Paul Chu of the University of Houston, somewhere in the late 80's, on 'room temperature' superconduction. There were no usable high temperature materials that could carry current without any electrical resistance but some materials contained surface islands that exhibited the Meissner effect at much higher temperatures than normal transition temperatures.

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed