Breaking News
News & Analysis

Broadcom to Divest Cellular Baseband Chip Business

6/2/2014 08:40 PM EDT
19 comments
NO RATINGS
2 saves
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
DaisyCSage
User Rank
Author
Re: Modem doom
DaisyCSage   6/3/2014 6:11:32 PM
I­m mak­ing ­over $­1­3k a month working ­part tim­e. I kept hea­ring other p­eople tell me­ how much m­oney they can ma­ke­ online­ so I d­ecide­d to look int­o­ it. Wel­, it was all tru­e and ha­s totally ch­anged­ my life. ­This is­ wha­t I do,

➜➜➜➜➜➜➜➜➜➜➜➜➜➜➜ W­­­W­­W.J­­­O­B­S­7­­­5.C­­­O­M
GO TO THE SITE AND CLICK NEXT TAB FOR MORE INFO AND HELP

vickistorm
User Rank
Author
Re: Modem doom
vickistorm   6/3/2014 5:35:04 PM
NO RATINGS
I disagree. The sale of Hisilicon & Spreadtrum can't reach this amount at all. However, they still can survive. BTW Hisilicon's GSM/TDSCDMA/WCDMA/TDLTE/FDDLTE modem(Balong) is doing good.

tpfj
User Rank
Author
Re: Modem doom
tpfj   6/3/2014 4:44:38 PM
NO RATINGS
Unless you are consistently selling >350~450M chipsets a year it is hard to fund the efforts required to maintain the level of complexity that modern cellular modems demand. These extracts from above say it all:

"We don't see enough traction there on the order of 3,000 engineers."

"Eric Brandt, Broadcom's chief financial officer, said the cellular baseband business revenue run rate for the first half of 2014 is between $200 million and $250 million, with gross margins of just tens of millions of dollars."

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: Modem doom
rick merritt   6/3/2014 4:32:58 PM
NO RATINGS
This must be a hard decision as importnat as cellular connectivity will be for thens and hundreds of millions of gadgets for years to come.

ismini.scouras
User Rank
Author
Not surprised
ismini.scouras   6/3/2014 3:14:04 PM
NO RATINGS
CEOs from all sectors (not just tech) are even more hard-pressed today to make risky decisions work. If an investment doesn't yield the kinds of gains that are most beneficial to shareholders within six to nine months, their job is on the line. I'm not inferring here that McGregor 's position was in jeopardy because there were no sentiments on the Street of that nature. But I think we will see management at more companies pull out of a market quickly, if they can't gain traction fast enough to be a market share leader.  

scud
User Rank
Author
Hurried closing
scud   6/3/2014 2:50:37 PM
NO RATINGS
There is an element of impatience in this closing decision as well. Broadcom acquired Renesas and is now closing down the whole thing (legacy Broadcom + Renesas cellular business) within 8 months. Is it realistic for complex modem technology to come out as phones in less than 8 months, and that too in large volumes? I wonder why the market related calculations could not have been done earlier .....

Scudrunner
User Rank
Author
Re: Modem doom
Scudrunner   6/3/2014 11:47:03 AM
NO RATINGS
The writing has been on the wall for a while here. I'm sure Apple and Samsung want a good alternative to Qualcomm, but technically they are so far ahead on LTE that nobody (except perhaps Intel) has deep enough pockets to catch up. Eventually. Qualcomm owns developed markets, Mediatek owns emerging (China) markets. Everyone else is bleeding money. Admittedly the move is long term negative for Broadcom's connectivity business but the financial pain was too great - the shares were trading at a significant discount to peers. 

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Modem doom
junko.yoshida   6/3/2014 11:11:16 AM
NO RATINGS
Indeed. It goes to show how quickly this celluar market could change. Especially competing in the mid to low-end is getting extremely tough. (Abd of course in the United States where handsets are heavily subsidized by operator, handset solutions could go extremely high-end, which makes it virtually impossible to compete if your chips are not in either Samsung or in Apple.

GeeKv2
User Rank
Author
Modem doom
GeeKv2   6/3/2014 6:16:57 AM
NO RATINGS
Another one bites the dust.

Only a handful of companies are making handset modems today. At this rate of decline, it wont take long before competition gets wiped out. The ones remaining will resort to arm twisting tactics and consumers will suffer.

<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed