Breaking News
News & Analysis

'Incompetence & Neglect' in GM Recall

6/6/2014 04:26 PM EDT
15 comments
NO RATINGS
1 saves
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
Re: Whistleblower Awards within the Company
DrQuine   6/28/2014 1:20:45 PM
NO RATINGS
The June 23, 2014 How GM Silenced Its Whistle-Blowers cover story of Bloomberg Business Week makes it clear that GM strongly resisted recall initiatives and punished quality control staff who sought to remedy issues they observed. I'm glad that determined investigators managed to uncover problems that should have been reported long ago.  

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
Whistleblower Awards within the Company
DrQuine   6/12/2014 9:01:50 AM
NO RATINGS
I propose that a whistleblower of the year award be created by GM for the person who eascalates the most important issue to senior management each year. If employees were trying to speak truth to power, rather than hiding it, these problems would quickly get addressed. I'd bet that the size of the recalls would also shrink if issues were escalated quickly.

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Blogger
Re: GM Recall - EETimes Featured on Google News
MeasurementBlues   6/10/2014 11:44:22 AM
NO RATINGS
@zeeglen Had these individuals voiced their concerns they might have been branded as "shyte disturbers" and fired that much sooner.

NASA disasters come to mind.

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Blogger
Re: GM Recall - EETimes Featured on Google News
MeasurementBlues   6/10/2014 11:42:21 AM
NO RATINGS
wasn't the question why do lower employees self-censor and why are problems not reported up the chain for management to correct?

Nothing like some good company politics. Insuch environments, we learn the art of playing by the rules (even if the rules are bad) and covering our tracks.

elctrnx_lyf
User Rank
Manager
Re: GM Recall - EETimes Featured on Google News
elctrnx_lyf   6/10/2014 7:36:37 AM
NO RATINGS
It is sad sometimes how the upper management doesn't have a good ears to the problems and no wonder lot of problems will never reach the top brass. It is important to reward the people in companies who identify the bad stuff as much as who does the new things.

TFCSD
User Rank
CEO
Re: GM Recall - EETimes Featured on Google News
TFCSD   6/9/2014 7:58:58 PM
'Incompetence & Neglect' in GM Recall

@Zeeglen: Agreed. I was recently employed at a company where I was tasked to work on cooling a "production approved" circuit which "worked" under the "right" conditions but had a little problem of SMD resistors falling off when too hot (300F +/- 100F). Yet, when properly cooled, it failed to function because this circuit needed the high resistor heat to cause some of the nearby SMD capacitors to breakdown enough to pass a needed RF signal. So this circuit, after passing an initial burst of RF signals, would not start working again until two or so minutes of resistor heating had passed. The present circuit design had "functioned" for a few years at the site and the only problem needing to be fixed was some SMD resistors falling off too soon before the calculated MTBF. I found a simple solution and showed some lower "powers that be". By adding a 1/16 watt pigtail resistor to the circuit, a multitude of RF sins were corrected and this quick fix would allow the additional cooling of the circuit to do its work without causing any RF dropouts. Being new to the company, I did not realize the major faux pas I had made just by insinuating that there may be a design problem with a production circuit that successfully passed through several layers of engineers and all the hoops, loops, tests, and endless meetings of the company's perfect lock step design process that prevented all mistakes (oh the audacity, what impudence I showed). Later I was told by some fellow workers and lower management that finding this new problem would likely cause a Government examination, document changes, board redesigns, board swap outs, retesting, and the Government would not look too kindly on this new costly problem (I "created") popping up during the company's upcoming contract review (oddly, the Gov. waved those tedious heat/power tests). Over the next few months I had the feeling of being a dead man walking and all the air being sucked out of the room. Certain upper/mid management and engineers now would not speak to me as before or acknowledge my presence as they would with others new hires and I was relegated to correcting documents in my small room. A fellow new hire admitted later that he had the heads up for weeks from management that I was not going to have my contract renewed. I had just finished training this "problem safe" shot gunning/board swapper how to fix the same circuit to the component level since I was supposedly being moved to "a new project" (later not funded) and needed to hand off all my current projects. Strangely, many of the original engineers of this wonderful circuit had either bailed to other projects or other companies just before I came on board. Sorry, but I digress, wasn't the question why do lower employees self-censor and why are problems not reported up the chain for management to correct?

perl_geek
User Rank
Freelancer
Not a good resume item
perl_geek   6/9/2014 4:31:54 PM
NO RATINGS
The individuals involved are going to have a hard time getting new jobs.

Apart from having been publicly named, can you imagine trying to explain the contents of the "reason for leaving your last company" box on the application form? (Assuming you can get anyone to let you that far.)

Anybody who's read "On a Clear Day, You Can See General Motors" is unlikely to have been surprised by the internal failings revealed by the report. The real problem in this case is that government CAFE regulations forced GM to sell cars they couldn't afford to build properly.

 

_hm
User Rank
CEO
Re: GM Recall - EETimes Featured on Google News
_hm   6/8/2014 2:17:10 PM
NO RATINGS
@Zeeglen: Yes, that is true. What one should do is just send one mild email expressing your concern to next level.

zeeglen
User Rank
Blogger
Re: GM Recall - EETimes Featured on Google News
zeeglen   6/8/2014 2:12:34 PM
NO RATINGS
@gadgetry ...individuals lower down in the organization: "Repeatedly, individuals failed to disclose critical pieces of information that could have changed the lives of those impacted by the faulty ignition switch."


Had these individuals voiced their concerns they might have been branded as "shyte disturbers" and fired that much sooner.


AZskibum
User Rank
CEO
Re: GM fired 15 individuals
AZskibum   6/8/2014 12:24:01 PM
NO RATINGS
The fact that it was known internally as the "ignition switch from hell" suggests that it was not a closely guarded secret that this switch had problems.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
EE Times editor Junko Yoshida grills two executives --Rick Walker, senior product marketing manager for IoT and home automation for CSR, and Jim Reich, CTO and co-founder at Palatehome.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week