Breaking News
Slideshow

EE Times Silicon 60: Hot Startups to Watch

60 emerging companies to follow
7/15/2014 11:15 AM EDT
4 comments
NO RATINGS
6 saves
Page 1 / 11 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
christian34q
User Rank
Author
Re: How you use this
christian34q   8/11/2014 8:52:14 AM
NO RATINGS
sg

MurphyMT
User Rank
Author
Silicon 60
MurphyMT   7/21/2014 6:16:39 PM
NO RATINGS
Dear EE Times Editors,

You may want to consider Aquantia Corp. (https://www.aquantia.com/), for inclusion in the Silicon 60 based on the following factors: technology, intended market, financial position, investment profile, maturity, and executive leadership. It is an emerging company to follow, for a variety of reasons.

Not the least of which is the market for 10GE, which is about to heat up, according to independent market research firms like Crehan Research: http://www.crehanresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/CREHAN-Server-Class-Adapter-Mid-2014-Long-range-Forecast.pdf

The company is also an "ACE" award winner for "Company of the Year"

 

nickhunn0
User Rank
Author
Sunrise Micro?
nickhunn0   7/19/2014 4:14:21 AM
NO RATINGS
I'm surprised Sunrise Micro aren't included. If they can deliver on their promise of low power, sub 1V radios and radio as an IP core they should be game changers.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
How you use this
rick merritt   7/16/2014 10:14:59 PM
NO RATINGS
Thx Peter for reviving the Silicon 60!

I'd love to hear from readers how they use it...besides checking to see if the startup they work at or do biz with is listed ;-)

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed