Breaking News
News & Analysis

Intel Plans A Future of CMOS

Moore's Law extended by new materials
4/5/2016 02:00 AM EDT
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
User Rank
Re: and... ?
R_Colin_Johnson   4/5/2016 6:58:12 PM
Yes, turning on whole columns is good enough for now, but you are right they will have to go to sub-array architectures in the future. I'm still at the conference so I'l try to catch Zhang and ask him, if he hasn't already departed! Thanks for the comment.

User Rank
and... ?
finfet1   4/5/2016 2:24:57 PM
Interesting specifics especially on the SRAM sleep Vdd vs read Vdd, but at a fine granularity this wouldn't work, obviously.  The overhead in charging the power rails up and down at a high frequency for reading different rows would probably offset the power savings. 

So then it comes down to a tradeoff between granularity of sleep/active rail application -- do you apply to specific sections of rows?  Or to small sub-arrays ?  My guess is on small sub-arrays with some intelligent digital management that acts like a virtual address map that maps active addresses to arrays so that active addresses are kept densely in the same sub-arrays.

It also comes down to a tradeoff between VDD voltages -- obviously retention voltage is probably 15-20% above near-threshold, with the tradeoff being on the tolerances of the sense amps, which are probably also PVT dynamically adjustable and digitally tuneable.


Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed