Breaking News
For Durability Testing, Ford Turns to Robots
7/1/2013

You'll find no test drivers inside Ford's testing vehicles. Its robotic technology is at work, operating the auto company's new accelerated, high-impact, on-road and off-road durability testing.
You'll find no test drivers inside Fordís testing vehicles. Its robotic technology is at work, operating the auto companyís new accelerated, high-impact, on-road and off-road durability testing.

Return to Article

View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Author
Re: Better get it right
MeasurementBlues   7/16/2013 6:16:21 PM
NO RATINGS
"You should use that argument as an expert witness in a court!"

Yes, but then I'd have to be in a room with lawyers.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Better get it right
junko.yoshida   7/16/2013 6:07:04 PM
NO RATINGS
You should use that argument as an expert witness in a court!

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Author
Re: Better get it right
MeasurementBlues   7/16/2013 5:51:13 PM
NO RATINGS
Junko, the part about 100% testing annoys me because as engineers, know that nothing is absolute. So, of course there's always a chance of something happeneing no matter how hard you work to prevent it. But lawyers try to explit even the tiniest of possbilities.

If I get get caught speeding, I might use my measurement knowledge by questioning the uncertainly of a radar gun's measurement. You see, all measurements have a tolerance, an accptable range where the actual value might fall. On top of that, there's a confidence level, some thing like. "You can be 95% confident that the actual measured speed was withing x% of the measured speed. But, that still means there's a 5% chance that the acual value is outside acceptable tolerance. It could be anywhere. Then you might ask when was the radar gun last calibrated? Perhaps it's past it's calibration interval period.

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Author
Re: Better get it right
MeasurementBlues   7/16/2013 5:42:01 PM
NO RATINGS
Junko,

So I'm thinking about my right thumb, fractured in 2009 when my car was hit from the right and the first joint smashed into the steering column. My hand was on the shift lever at the time of vehicle impact. I can't imagine how any kind of testing would have prevented that injury. But in the scheme of things, it's a very minor injury.

The result is that handwriting is difficult and I learned to use a trackball left handed. It drives the IT guys crazy when that have to take over my computer to install software.

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Author
Re: Better get it right
MeasurementBlues   7/16/2013 5:37:47 PM
NO RATINGS
"if the quality of a car does get better, that's a good thing."

Yes, of course. And I'm sure that there will be injuries that won't ever occur because of that testing, but how do you prove it?

 

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Better get it right
junko.yoshida   7/16/2013 5:33:57 PM
NO RATINGS
Ha ha, i love your picturing a lawyer asking: "you can't 100% test for safety with a robots."

That's a good one.

But even if it is challenged in a court, if the quality of a car does get better, that's a good thing. That's a business risk you have to take as a company, I suppose. 

 

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Author
Better get it right
MeasurementBlues   7/16/2013 5:24:44 PM
NO RATINGS
I can see it now. A car is tested with robots and the tests are more accurate and repeatable and overall, cars get safer. But there will be one accident with a car tested with robots where the laywers will question the test methods and say "you can't 100% test for safety with a robots" Robots don't have injuries, people do?

Trouble is, no matter how well, you test with a robot, the results will be challeneged in courst wooner or later.

krisi
User Rank
Author
so late?
krisi   7/3/2013 12:00:23 PM
NO RATINGS
I am with Dylan on this. I thought this has been done for years.

Olaf Barheine
User Rank
Author
Re: Robots rule
Olaf Barheine   7/2/2013 9:37:49 AM
NO RATINGS
But I think those robots will never replace human test drivers. They will only complement them like computer simulations. By the way, I would miss all these brand new cars on our streets. Just two days ago I believe I have seen a prototype of the new Mercedes GLA.

elctrnx_lyf
User Rank
Author
Re: Robots rule
elctrnx_lyf   7/2/2013 6:55:19 AM
NO RATINGS
Using the robots for testing a vehicle is definitely makes it faster and more accurate. This is basically automated regression test for the automobile on test track. It definitely involves huge understanding of the stresses or impact and in the end it requires the engineers to track the data from the tests.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed