Breaking News
Metrology: The Turtle of Engineering
10/14/2013

< Previous   Image 2 of 2   

Many calibration labs use the Fluke 5700A to calibrate multimeters and other equipment.
Many calibration labs use the Fluke 5700A to calibrate multimeters and other equipment.

< Previous   Image 2 of 2   

Return to Article

View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Blogger
Re:
MeasurementBlues   2/24/2014 4:55:26 PM
NO RATINGS
For most calibrations to ahve any value, they need to be traceable to a national lab such as NIST (US), NPL (UK), or NRC (Canada). National lbas provide uncertaintly and confidence levels for equipment they calibrate. The equipment calibrated at a national las isusually a transfer standard that is then used to calibrate. equipment in a working lab.

See Follow the Chain to NIST-Traceable Calibrations

prabhakar_deosthali
User Rank
CEO
Re:
prabhakar_deosthali   10/15/2013 12:10:39 PM
NO RATINGS
As long the sensors are analog, and the component values get affected by the ambient conditions , there will be need for calibration. However the reference equipment itself is subject to periodic calibration for which some absolute reference standards are required in the test and measurement lab.

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
the importance of calibration
DrQuine   10/14/2013 10:32:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Many people believe that modern digital equipment makes the need for calibration obsolete. They are wrong. I recently found a "currently calibrated" digital (long stem) thermometers that was reading 24.0 °F high, a digital logging thermometer that required a 13.0 °F offset to read correctly, and a digital scale that was reading 25 pounds off (on a 75 pound scale). If your team starts questioning instrument calibrations, push back.  If the measurement is worth making, it is worth making it correctly.

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Blogger
Re: like nasa
MeasurementBlues   10/14/2013 2:29:15 PM
NO RATINGS
@Caleb, It's really when you're dealing with analog equipment. You can also substitute "unpredictable" for unproven. See Go inside Fluke's electrical metrology lab, from my visit there in 2012.

Caleb Kraft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: like nasa
Caleb Kraft   10/14/2013 1:57:02 PM
NO RATINGS
I was referring to new equipment (less than 10 years) being "unproven" as per the first paragraph. With how quickly tech advances I hadn't really thought about some of the slower sides. 

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Blogger
Re: like nasa
MeasurementBlues   10/14/2013 1:47:15 PM
NO RATINGS
@Caleb, There is another issue relating to NASA and the military regarding calibration. These organizations have their own promary standards and calibratin procedures. There is debate in the calibration community about NIST traceability and is it necessary in some circumstances. In other words, should one accept measurement that may not be NIST traceable?

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Blogger
Re: like nasa
MeasurementBlues   10/14/2013 1:44:46 PM
NO RATINGS
"I hadn't really thought about this from a callibration standpoint." What do mean by "this"? Are you referrng to long-lived equipment when the parts are unavailable.?

Caleb Kraft
User Rank
Blogger
like nasa
Caleb Kraft   10/14/2013 11:31:28 AM
NO RATINGS
That's interesting. I hadn't really thought about this from a callibration standpoint. It reminds me of the way NASA handles hardware.

Most Recent Comments
_hm
 
Tech on line balaji
 
seaEE
 
Duane Benson
 
MeasurementBlues
 
rick merritt
 
rick merritt
 
rick merritt
 
Garcia-Lasheras
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
EE Times Senior Technical Editor Martin Rowe will interview EMC engineer Kenneth Wyatt.
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll