Breaking News
News & Analysis

TI Launches Purpose-Built SoCs for Automotive Vision

10/16/2013 00:01 AM EDT
15 comments
NO RATINGS
1 saves
Page 1 / 2 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
daleste
User Rank
Author
Re: Cool
daleste   10/17/2013 8:41:09 PM
NO RATINGS
This technology will get big fast.  Since TI does manufacture chips for auotomotive, they have a leg up on the qualification requirements.  Not all semiconductor companies can meet the automotive requirements.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
Re: Cool
junko.yoshida   10/17/2013 6:58:38 PM
NO RATINGS
That's certainly true, Rick. I was just at ITS World Congress in Tokyo. It was clear that every carmaker is in need of "purpose built" SoCs for autoomtive vision that sees and analyze the situation faster and better. (and at low power!) 

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Cool
rick merritt   10/16/2013 5:44:13 PM
NO RATINGS
These SoCs suggest smart people think this is getting very real

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Author
Re: ease of programming
Sheetal.Pandey   10/16/2013 2:15:23 PM
NO RATINGS
TI has very good development support in terms of availabilitg of free technical documentation. Their engineers are also very cooperative so time to design remains in schedule.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
ease of programming
junko.yoshida   10/16/2013 12:14:39 PM
NO RATINGS
TI's new SoC is packed with everything you probable wanted in your next ADAS SoC. The question now is how easy for you to use this one!

<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed