Breaking News
News & Analysis

'Super WiFi' Comes to WVU

7/9/2013 06:00 PM EDT
26 comments
< Previous Page 2 / 2
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Additional Info on healthcare wireless
junko.yoshida   8/5/2013 1:36:36 PM
NO RATINGS
Thank you for posting the URL to the PDF. This looks like a pretty comprehensive paper. But you are right. When it comes to managing the hospital RF specturm, it seems like a lot of education/training programs are needed.

Greybeard1
User Rank
Rookie
Additional Info on healthcare wireless
Greybeard1   8/5/2013 1:30:26 PM
NO RATINGS
In case any of you are curious aboout the many challenges facing wireless in healthcare, the Association for the Advancement of medical Instrumentation has published a compilation of articles.

http://www.aami.org/hottopics/wireless/AAMI/Going_Wireless_2013.pdf

Sorry, the link didn't post - you'll need to copy and paste into your browser.


Bear in mind that few in healthcare have any technical RF training or experience.  This makes it quite a challenge.  My own expertise is a combination of military electronics tech training, the wee bit of electromagnetics I got in my EE undergrad and amatuer radio.  And I'm considered an expert in the healthcare community (pretty scary).

 

Robert Syputa
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Theory of Operation?
Robert Syputa   7/19/2013 11:11:51 PM
NO RATINGS
DrQuine, you hit on the main problem with so-called 'Super Wi-Fi' - it is not able to ride in common with the popular version of 2.4GHz Wi-Fi or, for that matter, as a common mode of operation for SmartPhones and other mobile devices.


Combined with the limitations imposed on the narrowband junk spectrum allowed for use by our benevolent overlord government (LOL) in allocating the public (sic)  spectrum for public use, the lack of a way to leverage the clumsy application of W.S. into widespread use relegates it to failure as a pervasive technology and, probably being taken back for re-allocation and use by licensed operators.

Give White Space experiment five years to die... and meanwhile for mainstream wireless to become more adaptive including use of some of the mechanisms of White Spaces.. minus the right for the public to use it directly.

The problem with White Spaces is lack of political and industry muscle to cause there to be wider channels and co-allocation with commercial applications.  For instance, the incentive auction could be arranged to require dual-MAC use.

White Spaces.. dead on arrival baring a miracle of public will.

VictorRBlake
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Not just rural
VictorRBlake   7/19/2013 3:05:13 PM
NO RATINGS
Correction, I meant less available spectrum (in urban areas) than in rural areas  the technology is extremely useful for covering gaps between APs in an URBAN areas as well as any rural areas.

VictorRBlake
User Rank
Rookie
Not just rural
VictorRBlake   7/18/2013 1:24:22 PM
It's not the data rate that makes it "Super WiFi" The current rules (10-174 order) allow transmission at (for af and wran) at 4W which is 10 to 100 times more power than WiFi which typically operates in the milliwatt (EIR) range. This is likely to expanded to even higher power signals. The WRAN (802.22) variants will eventually operate up to approximately 60km circumference.

 

In addition, the spectrum cited in the article is only one band. As with other WiFi standards (that operate at 2.4, 5.8, etc.) af can operate in the DTV bands (which overlaps also with wireless microphones).

Although clearly there is less available spectrum in rural areas, the technology is extremely useful for covering gaps between APs in rural environments. With the explosion of APs and soon -- real WiFi mobility, af will eventually allow a hybrid approach with ac, n, g, and b providing the micro coverage and af providing macro coverage.

 

 

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Let's call it rural narrowband
junko.yoshida   7/15/2013 8:15:10 PM
NO RATINGS
Not only that, Rick, I think, what seems like a real advantage (or purpose) of bringing broadband Interent to the uderserved population would get lost...if we spin it "rural narrowband." No? It just sounds too negative! 

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Let's call it rural narrowband
rick merritt   7/15/2013 8:06:40 PM
NO RATINGS
Some marketing wonk was brilliant in calling this "Super WiFi."

As Bert points out its a fairly narrowband (by today's standards) shared channel.

But if they called it "narrowband, long-range rural Wi-Fi (NLR Wi-Fi)" nobody would write about it except a few small town newspapers and agricultural magazines ;-)

 

mhrackin
User Rank
CEO
Re: A user missed in 608-614
mhrackin   7/15/2013 11:19:04 AM
NO RATINGS
And how much would it cost to get all those stars, nebulae, etc. to shift the frequency of their emissions????  There's a REASON this band is primarily assigned to Radio Astronomy!

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: A user missed in 608-614
junko.yoshida   7/12/2013 11:05:03 AM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for your detailed response. So, you are saying that this ain't happening. Understood.

Page 1 / 3   >   >>
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
How to Cope with a Burpy Comet
October 17, 2pm EDT Friday
EE Times Editorial Director Karen Field interviews Andrea Accomazzo, Flight Director for the Rosetta Spacecraft.
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed