Breaking News
What Can Hot TDR Do for You?
9/2/2013

< Previous   Image 2 of 3      Next >

Figure 2: The traditional solution for an HDMI cable test (left) requires more instrumentation, introducing costs and complexity. The vector-network analyzer approach (right) is now the preferred approach for the task.
Figure 2: The traditional solution for an HDMI cable test (left) requires more instrumentation, introducing costs and complexity. The vector-network analyzer approach (right) is now the preferred approach for the task.

< Previous   Image 2 of 3      Next >

Return to Article

View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
WThomas.Phillips
User Rank
Author
Scope reveals faults that VNA cannot see
WThomas.Phillips   9/10/2013 3:34:23 AM
NO RATINGS
Having done work recently comparing Scope (Tek) and VNA (Agilent + R&S), it was very clear that VNA (probably because of the greater bandwidth of a digital pulse vs the VNA source / narrow band detector) just do not resolve faults that the scope can see.

Cost, size and user-unfriendly user interfaces of all the big iron boxes above does limit the usability in volume production, but there are now more affordable sampling scopes (eg. PicoScope 9xxx) that cost one-tenth of the price and are the size of a paperback book (if you remember them?).

PS: I'm not affiliated to any of the above companies, just a user trying to find an effective TDR capability.

big bucks
User Rank
Author
Re: For more information...
big bucks   9/5/2013 4:55:03 PM
NO RATINGS
A company called LiveWire Innovation has a TDR technology called Spread Spectrum TDR which works over any live energized circuit and gives accurate impedance information no matter the voltage, current or noise on the line.  It not only detects impedance mismatches but locates and characterizes them while the line is powered. Opens, Shorts and intermittent Arc Faults on energized cables.

 

 

Janet.Smith
User Rank
Author
For more information...
Janet.Smith   9/4/2013 12:43:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Slides: DesignCon 2013: Comparison and Contrast of State-of-the-Art Time Domain Relectometry Measurement Instruments

http://www.designconcommunity.com/lg_redirect.asp?piddl_lgid_docid=261068

 

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed