Breaking News
News & Analysis

Update: New chip propels Intel into data plane

Intel's big squeeze
2/14/2012 07:33 PM EST
9 comments
NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 2 / 2
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
ckachris
User Rank
Author
re: Update: New chip propels Intel into data plane
ckachris   2/15/2012 12:15:51 PM
NO RATINGS
In the past Intel had the Xscale communication processors and the IXP network processors specially designed for the data plane. However at that time it sold the Xscale to Marvell. Now it seems that Intel returns to the the data plane...

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Update: New chip propels Intel into data plane
rick merritt   2/15/2012 4:54:52 PM
NO RATINGS
That's right, and this time they want to drive all traffic to x86 cores, typically on Xeon chips rather than using specialty built chips with ARM or other cores such as were used on XScale.

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Author
re: Update: New chip propels Intel into data plane
old account Frank Eory   2/15/2012 5:19:31 PM
NO RATINGS
I love this comment: "Base stations using the chips will still need some external parts such as Viterbi decoders." Um, last time I checked, nobody makes Viterbi decoder ICs anymore. That function is an IP block that one puts in an SoC.

LarryM99
User Rank
Author
re: Update: New chip propels Intel into data plane
LarryM99   2/15/2012 9:14:13 PM
NO RATINGS
It seems like a real niche market for a mass-market player like Intel. High-end switch fabrics for base stations are sexy, but they wouldn't seem to be a real volume business. You have to wonder if there is a larger market that they are using this to gain entry into at some point. Larry M.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Update: New chip propels Intel into data plane
rick merritt   2/16/2012 3:15:11 AM
NO RATINGS
I think there will be a lot of macro, micro and pico base stations deployed in the next ten years, and Intel would love to see that shift to being an x86 app. It's not as big a market as smartphones for sure, but its significant.

LarryM99
User Rank
Author
re: Update: New chip propels Intel into data plane
LarryM99   2/16/2012 4:00:27 AM
NO RATINGS
Yeah, I thought about that, but it doesn't seem like those are going to be as dataplane-intensive as they are talking about here. I guess that if you throw in compression / encryption it might be a worthwhile target for a family of chips that scale to the job. Larry M.

Mxv
User Rank
Author
re: Update: New chip propels Intel into data plane
Mxv   2/17/2012 10:29:37 PM
NO RATINGS
4 gigabit interfaces does not a network processor make. I see not threat to Cavium or the others. I little too much hype in this story.

nrdmao
User Rank
Author
re: Update: New chip propels Intel into data plane
nrdmao   2/18/2012 1:09:47 AM
NO RATINGS
I could see this chip being used to offload packet processing functions from hypervisors or virtual machines. As networking is virtualized into the cloud, the packet processing requirements on cloud servers is increased. Perhaps this is Intel's admission that virtual networking doesn't compete and/or scale on x86. You still need specialized networking hardware.

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed