Design Con 2015
Breaking News
News & Analysis

Could 450-mm wafers make sense away from the leading edge

Could analog, RF be made on 450-mm wafers?
1/20/2012 06:23 PM EST
6 comments
NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 2 / 2
More Related Links
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Could 450-mm wafers make sense away from the leading edge
KB3001   1/20/2012 8:42:19 PM
NO RATINGS
While there might be more of an economic argument for More-than-Moore nowadays, it's still a big leap to suggest they would lead the transition to 450mm wafers IMO.

pinhead1
User Rank
Rookie
re: Could 450-mm wafers make sense away from the leading edge
pinhead1   1/20/2012 9:06:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Agreed. It seems ludicrous to think that you could build a multi-billion dollar to make analog parts, and compete with depreciated and well characterized 200mm fabs. TI's RFAB was built almost entirely with 2nd hand equipment, so it not a good bit of evidence for 450mm more than Moore. Maxim is not running their own 300mm fab, either - so they're agnostic at best.

chipmonk0
User Rank
Manager
re: Could 450-mm wafers make sense away from the leading edge
chipmonk0   1/23/2012 7:56:38 PM
NO RATINGS
Would those who make just low margin products like analog or RF ID chips be able to afford a new Fab for 450 mm ? Even if they had the resources would it not be a better use of their money to upgrade Fabs for high margin products like processors ? The "analyst" quoted here needs to make a reality check.

gatorfan
User Rank
Rookie
re: Could 450-mm wafers make sense away from the leading edge
gatorfan   1/23/2012 10:13:48 PM
NO RATINGS
This seems to be a case of where the "research" fits the hypothesis given to it by it's sponsors. I don't see the financial merit in the concept and at best an attempt at hand waving to get the conclusion to remotely fit. I went thru this type of thinking at a once proud and formidable semiconductor manufacturer and it ended in their ruin. There are three strategic ingredients to a wafer size change: 1) Capital leverage 2) Manufacturing scaling leverage 3) Performance leverage It's utter lunacy to say any of those three are invalid and a "new" economic model has dawned.

docdivakar
User Rank
CEO
re: Could 450-mm wafers make sense away from the leading edge
docdivakar   2/6/2012 7:27:22 PM
NO RATINGS
@KB3001: I agree with your arument on More-than-Moore as the lead to 450mm. The industry is still grappling with handling of ultra-thin wafers in the assembly flow of W-to-W stacking. This problem gets exponentially amplified with 450mm wafers. What I would like to see is a study by the proponents of 450mm on whether or not the 'have's can survive the transition to 450mm when many 'have-not's choose to stay with 300mm for multiple reasons, economics being the major one! MP Divakar

PV-Geek
User Rank
Rookie
re: Could 450-mm wafers make sense away from the leading edge
PV-Geek   2/11/2012 10:40:29 PM
NO RATINGS
Agreed. I don't see the cost justification at anything other than the leading nodes. You can't get the leverage you need. I wonder if instead of investing in larger wafers if more fabs will instead start investing in 3D-IC technology to get density scaling using the 3rd dimension. It would probably be lower cost.

Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week