Breaking News
Teardown

Teardown: Samsung Galaxy S4

Exynos Octa
4/26/2013 06:35 PM EDT
17 comments
NO RATINGS
2 saves
< Previous Page 2 / 23 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
eewiz
User Rank
CEO
re: Teardown: Samsung Galaxy S4
eewiz   4/27/2013 1:49:22 PM
NO RATINGS
Mostly an incremental upgrade from S3. The one being released in my place comes with Qualcomm processor instead of the Exynos octa, which seemingly is a better choice w.r.t power consumption

chipmonk0
User Rank
CEO
re: Teardown: Samsung Galaxy S4
chipmonk0   4/27/2013 5:32:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Allan : looks like you are the first with teardown of the S4. How about the size and speed of the new LPDDR 3 type of DRAM you found in it. How many dies for the DRAM ? How are they packaging all his ? PoP ? How much gap beteen the 2 packages stacked one over the other ?

joe_joe_
User Rank
Rookie
re: Teardown: Samsung Galaxy S4
joe_joe_   4/28/2013 2:55:58 PM
NO RATINGS
Hard to keep adding features when there's no one else to copy from.

JKT002
User Rank
Rookie
re: Teardown: Samsung Galaxy S4
JKT002   4/29/2013 4:14:49 AM
NO RATINGS
Agree :-) Sarcastic but to certain degree, very true.

kanag
User Rank
Rookie
re: Teardown: Samsung Galaxy S4
kanag   4/29/2013 11:09:41 AM
NO RATINGS
In some country, they have used Qualcomm Quadcore processor rather than Exynos octa. No such information on tear down.

R0ckstar
User Rank
Rookie
re: Teardown: Samsung Galaxy S4
R0ckstar   4/29/2013 5:38:19 PM
NO RATINGS
I received a couple of the Qualcomm variants of this phone last week. Although I am impressed with the RFID and IR remote capabilities and other features (oh yeah, and the phone), my main issue is the locked bootloader that hinders flashing of standard Android on the device for those who don't care for the Samsung flavor. This is the main downside to me for getting a non-nexus Android phone regardless of features.

gatorfan
User Rank
Rookie
re: Teardown: Samsung Galaxy S4
gatorfan   4/29/2013 6:01:08 PM
NO RATINGS
Is the net effect then that a Samsung phone is not really "open" or with choice? The difference between Samsung and Apple has dropped to near zero if so.

R0ckstar
User Rank
Rookie
re: Teardown: Samsung Galaxy S4
R0ckstar   4/29/2013 6:25:56 PM
NO RATINGS
That is correct. The original Google mantra of the "open" Android system has since essentially been closed by the US carriers as far as the consumer is concerned. The maintenance of the original galaxy S phones were discontinued years ago, yet I had the most recent Android jelly bean on my 3 year old phone simply because it was flashable and therefore self-serviceable. Now I've lost hot spot, flashability, and some other carrier crippled features as a consequence of "upgrading".

ITguy
User Rank
Rookie
re: Teardown: Samsung Galaxy S4
ITguy   4/29/2013 11:00:24 PM
NO RATINGS
So true. If not for Apple Samsung would be throwing Octa cores in clam shell phones

aaschmidt
User Rank
Rookie
re: Teardown: Samsung Galaxy S4
aaschmidt   5/3/2013 5:55:07 AM
NO RATINGS
Well, they had a touch phone on Korean market before iPhone. The os and overall software side was quite bad, though. S/W had been always a poor side of Samsung Mobile. Then Google came along...

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.