Breaking News
Startup Claims Cellular Breakthrough
2/19/2014

Image 1 of 2      Next >

Perlman demoed eight iPhones laid side-by-side, each receiving separate high-def video streams from a single Artemis pCell.
Perlman demoed eight iPhones laid side-by-side, each receiving separate high-def video streams from a single Artemis pCell.

Image 1 of 2      Next >

Return to Article

View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
No turning Shannon on its head
Bert22306   2/19/2014 6:58:34 PM
NO RATINGS
Rick, what the paper describes is otherwise known as MIMO. Each AP transmits a signal on the same frequency channel. As long as the receivers can decorrelate the propagation paths from the different APs, they can reconstruct the desired signal.

In traditional MIMO, each transmitter sends multiple beams in different directions, and each receiver would combine the bit streams from all of the propagation paths. In this DIDO, it looks like each receiver is only interested in one of the propagation paths, rather than aggregating the signals from all of the paths. The net effect is the same, though.

These are clever techniques that APPEAR to violate Shannon's limit, but in fact they don't. They depend on decorrelated propagation paths, much as you would have if you used multiple separate cables in parallel. If the signals paths become more correlated, you will lose that spectral efficiency. For example, bring the APs physically very close together compared with the distance to the receivers. That sort of thing makes it difficult to decorrelate the different propagation paths.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
radio head
junko.yoshida   2/19/2014 7:05:22 PM
NO RATINGS
Thank God, finally here's a story that adds technical insights in Artemis! Thank you, Rick.

The hard part appears to be NOT the radio head, but operators' willingness to embrace the technolgoy to get ready with the backend for deployment.

rick merritt
User Rank
Blogger
Re: No turning Shannon on its head
rick merritt   2/19/2014 7:09:28 PM
NO RATINGS
Hi Bert: There was a pretty good discussion of the MIMO-esque nature of the 2011 DIDO paper in a story I refered to here.

Perlman is still keeping some of this secret sauce as any startup would. But it seems to me now this is sort of a mashup up of MIMO, C-RAN and virtualization software.

What do others think?

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
Re: No turning Shannon on its head
Bert22306   2/19/2014 8:04:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Rick, I know, that's the paper I was referring to. I re-read it before commenting.

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
Puzzled
DrQuine   2/20/2014 7:48:16 AM
I'm puzzled by this technology - but very much appreciate the need for strong signals in our local areas and the frustrations so many of us experience with local "dead" areas. The photograph shows a single "head" broadcasting to 8 iPhones yet the text mentions that there is a centimeter sized zone at the cell phone (which would imply that positioning of the phone is critical). Late in the article, there is mention that 350 transmitters could cover San Francisco. Are there regional transmitters and then local repeaters? Do the transmitters synthesize a small region of interest for each phone? At what speed can the transmitter maintain the connection with a moving mobile phone?

zewde yeraswork
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Puzzled
zewde yeraswork   2/20/2014 9:35:17 AM
NO RATINGS
Sounds pretty ambitious for a startup consisting of just eight full-time engineers. The fact that it is supposed to support different latencies and accomplish so much in so little time is a testament to Perlman's entrepreneurial spirit.

rick merritt
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Puzzled
rick merritt   2/20/2014 10:39:25 AM
NO RATINGS
@DrQuine: The way I understand it, the user devcie can move wherever the user wants and the system tracks it--but this capability has yet to be proven at mass scale.

The radio heads can be placed somewhat randomly and don't have t create traditional radio cell coverage areas since they apparently work by using overlap and interference, but here my understanding gets a bit fuzzy.

I'll ask Steve to jump on and answer your question.

rick merritt
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Puzzled
rick merritt   2/20/2014 10:40:07 AM
NO RATINGS
@Zewde: Indeed, cellular disruption with eight people is highly ambitious!

LarryM99
User Rank
CEO
Re: Puzzled
LarryM99   2/20/2014 11:55:25 AM
NO RATINGS
@Rick, this is true. Generally these days you have to scale up to about fifty people before you can sell out to Facebook for $16B or so...

I'm not sure exactly where this technilogy will fit. Cellular as we know it today is one place, but there is also the possibility that there could be something new growing from this. High speed in the local link is only one part of the equation. What kind of backhaul infrastructure would be necessary to support this? Is this really cellular technology (i.e. highly mobile) or potentially the basis for a (finally competitive!) new ISP technology?

Michael.Bergman
User Rank
Rookie
Re: No turning Shannon on its head
Michael.Bergman   2/20/2014 9:39:27 PM
NO RATINGS
Well...it appears from the white paper that the data center does channel estimation (with the test signal) on all the AP and receiver paths.  Say there are N AP's and M receivers.  So the data center is looking at complexity of O(N*M) in channel estimation.

After doing the channel estimation, the data center looks at the necessary "clean" waveform that it wants to get to each receiver, inverts the N*M matrix of impulse responses, convolves that with the desired waveform vector, and the result is the transmission vector. 

When the transmission vector passes through all those channels, it is distorted by that N*M set of channels, just as expected from tha channel estimation.  After distortion, the original desired signals all arrive at the receivers.  Slick.

A couple of things I'd be interested in learning more about.  First, the O(N*M) complexity problem, is there a way around that?  Second, you'd probably want to update your channel models quick enough to stay within the coherence time.  But that will eat away at your data rate, unless they're estimating on the fly (which is possible). 

I'm a skeptic with "we broke Shannon's Law" schemes, having seen a few (hey, spiral modulation anyone?), but this looks pretty slick, on the face of it.

Mike

Page 1 / 3   >   >>
Most Recent Comments
tommyma518
 
KeesM
 
?-??>
 
annawood
 
HardwIntr
 
Darren.Galpin
 
Sheetal.Pandey
 
Wnderer
 
Sheetal.Pandey
Most Recent Messages
7/23/2014
6:22:42 AM
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
Join our online Radio Show on Friday 11th July starting at 2:00pm Eastern, when EETimes editor of all things fun and interesting, Max Maxfield, and embedded systems expert, Jack Ganssle, will debate as to just what is, and is not, and embedded system.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week