Breaking News
News & Analysis

Talk from the hip at Microchip

Dennouncing 'Internet of Things'
5/7/2012 02:08 PM EDT
14 comments
NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 2 / 2
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
ReneCardenas
User Rank
Author
re: Talk from the hip at Microchip
ReneCardenas   5/18/2012 9:09:47 PM
NO RATINGS
Ditto, as a long time user in several of the different offerings from 8 to 16 bit devices, I agree that Microchip serves well their shareholders by focusing strategies in industrial and consumer embedded products. Few vendors compare to the size and depth of their user knowledge base and prompt response to errata.

DCH0
User Rank
Author
re: Talk from the hip at Microchip
DCH0   5/15/2012 10:14:44 PM
NO RATINGS
The Microchip tools and support make them a pleasure to work with for a low volume (500K EAU) user. The tools actually work and I do not have to spend days fighting them.

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Author
re: Talk from the hip at Microchip
Robotics Developer   5/15/2012 6:21:17 PM
NO RATINGS
I love the straight talk and directness of the CEO! I would wish that more companies would follow that example. In some ways, I wonder if his clear, direct communication style is an enabler for the company. The understanding of the company direction and interests can only help each employee in their job and managers at all levels do theirs.

t.alex
User Rank
Author
re: Talk from the hip at Microchip
t.alex   5/12/2012 4:03:25 AM
NO RATINGS
In fact quite a number of companies in India use Microchip in many applications.

SkyhighSG
User Rank
Author
re: Talk from the hip at Microchip
SkyhighSG   5/11/2012 12:54:21 PM
NO RATINGS
IMO, Microchip may not have the latest technologies or the brightest people in R&D, but it has a clear-minded CEO to understand what customers really want. I always have this impression that Indian tends to change their minds very easily, talk a lot BS, but produce poor results, and think too complicated, but Steve Sanghi is very different.

SkyhighSG
User Rank
Author
re: Talk from the hip at Microchip
SkyhighSG   5/11/2012 12:50:57 PM
NO RATINGS
Not really. In fact, Microchip offers one of the easiest tools to debug and program its MCUs. I have used 68HC11/09, ATmega128/8, Cortex-M0 and 8051 and MSP430. Microchip products have the least problems of all. Microchip's MCU may not be the cheapest, compared to Atmel AVR, Silab 8051 or Cortex-M0 (any brand), but its tools are very reliable. As a veteran user, any MCU is very easy to use, if you have good attitude to learn and aptitude to explore.

Aftab Sarwar
User Rank
Author
re: Talk from the hip at Microchip
Aftab Sarwar   5/10/2012 5:19:20 AM
NO RATINGS
seems that they can shift from MIPS to ARM anytime and that is not "that critical to solutions" they offer. Something "thought provoking"!

t.alex
User Rank
Author
re: Talk from the hip at Microchip
t.alex   5/9/2012 11:16:04 AM
NO RATINGS
Sometime ago Microchip MCU is relatively hard to program with some supported only assembly language. Now it is number 4, impressive!

BillyBoy
User Rank
Author
re: Talk from the hip at Microchip
BillyBoy   5/9/2012 4:23:33 AM
NO RATINGS
http://adapteva.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=72&Itemid=79 The Epiphany multicore architecture IP is an integrated microprocessor solution, featuring up to 4,096 processors on a single chip, connected through a high-bandwidth on-chip network. Each processor node represents a fully-featured floating point RISC processor built from scratch for multicore processing, a high bandwidth local memory system, and an extensive set of built in hardware features for multicore communication. This has got to revolutionize handheld processing, no?

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
re: Talk from the hip at Microchip
junko.yoshida   5/8/2012 7:58:00 PM
NO RATINGS
yes, see the second page of this story.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed