Design Con 2015
Breaking News
News & Analysis

Broadcom sees rising 20 nm costs amid handset push

Move to integrated apps processors
12/6/2012 08:30 PM EST
19 comments
NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 2 / 2
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
BJ-5
User Rank
Rookie
re: Broadcom sees rising 20 nm costs amid handset push
BJ-5   12/7/2012 8:05:24 PM
NO RATINGS
Rick, Implication for Intel's first 22nm Valley view (Atom SOC) will have somewhere in the neighborhood 30-40% higher cost than equal parts from Qualcomm (snapdragon) or nVidia (Tegra 4) fabricated parts in foundry 28LP or 28HPM but bigger problem is TAM is moving to integrated apps and base band on single SOC. Valley view not having on die integrated LTE base band makes it uninteresting to market

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Broadcom sees rising 20 nm costs amid handset push
resistion   12/7/2012 5:03:59 PM
NO RATINGS
Well to be exact not every layer is double patterned. It's not automatic doubling of chip cost. It will be diluted by large number of non-doubled metal layers.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Broadcom sees rising 20 nm costs amid handset push
rick merritt   12/7/2012 4:54:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Of course, double patterning will raise costs even if all else was the same

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Broadcom sees rising 20 nm costs amid handset push
rick merritt   12/7/2012 4:54:24 PM
NO RATINGS
What's the implication for Intel's own mobile SoCs aka Medfield and follow ons?

the_floating_ gate
User Rank
Rookie
re: Broadcom sees rising 20 nm costs amid handset push
the_floating_ gate   12/7/2012 4:21:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Take a look at wafer price projections (past and future) Nvidia deeply unhappy with TSMC, claims 20nm essentially worthless http://www.extremetech.com/computing/123529-nvidia-deeply-unhappy-with-tsmc-claims-22nm-essentially-worthless ASML stated just litho will be 1.7x for 20nm compared to 28nm

BJ-5
User Rank
Rookie
re: Broadcom sees rising 20 nm costs amid handset push
BJ-5   12/7/2012 3:12:24 PM
NO RATINGS
Rick, 100% correct. Intel's manufacturing for foundry and internal products only is viable due to cost for it's $100-1000 CPU and select high margin FPGA and ASICs. Someday the analysis will understand Intel does not have a manufacturing advantage for cost sensitive mobile or foundry to Apple.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Broadcom sees rising 20 nm costs amid handset push
rick merritt   12/7/2012 2:43:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks Song Chou. That strongly suggests Intel is not ready to supply foundry services to anything but cost insensitive parts such as FPGAs and router ASICs

song-chou-1
User Rank
Rookie
re: Broadcom sees rising 20 nm costs amid handset push
song-chou-1   12/7/2012 12:42:23 PM
NO RATINGS
I attended and McGregor also said "20nm costing more will surprise market" that is partly because Intel Marketing is talking different message But I spoke to someone in Intel Procurement Group about why they are taping out LTE and RF mobile chips at TSMC 28nm. Intel guy said Intel's advanced internal nodes manufacturing (22 and 14nm) was not cost effective with foundry. low cost mobile chips are going go stay at 28nm for industry and even Intel (using outside manufacturing)

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Broadcom sees rising 20 nm costs amid handset push
resistion   12/7/2012 6:11:45 AM
NO RATINGS
The margin per transistor may rise (compensating higher cost) if the power per transistor is lower. But even this scaling will be limited as well, by noise. 20 nm is already very small (anybody recall the electron mean free path?)

<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
EE Times Senior Technical Editor Martin Rowe will interview EMC engineer Kenneth Wyatt.
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll