Digital Home DesignLine Blog

Apple Sample

FCC Chairman continues free broadband wireless push

Maurice Wright

8/21/2008 8:19 PM EDT

Going back to the 700-Mhz wireless spectrum auction earlier this year, FCC Chairman Kevin Martin has made it clear that he views free broadband wireless service as critical to the future of the US. More recently, Martin has promoted free wireless in what's called the AWS-3 (Advanced Wireless Services) spectrum with the 3 designating a particular block of frequencies in the 2-GHz band. This week USA Today interviewed Martin and he reiterated his plans for free broadband wireless. He defines the need for free broadband as a "social obligation." I certainly don't want the US slipping further behind other nations in math and science because we lack universal broadband. But how often is the access as opposed to a good PC the problem? And is Martin holding back potentially profitable network deployments?

Earlier this summer, RCR Wireless covered the AWS situation and noted that the free-access issue would delay AWS auctions into 2009. The USA Today article notes that the free-access issue may or may not be hampering T-Mobile in a potentially profitable service offering. I plan to research the issue a bit more because I'm not quite sure who is right or if there are clear answers.

Still I keep thinking that Martin, despite noble intentions, is headed down the wrong path. The USA Today article mentions rural citizens that can't get broadband today. Without question that's a problem. But I don't see a cellular-like broadband service as the answer. If the answer is wireless in nature, then the right answer is probably WiMax. But rural citizens that desire broadband and can afford service do have satellite as an option.

I fear the far more important citizens that have no broadband access are disadvantaged urban residents. Those citizens could get broadband but can't afford it. Moreover they can't afford a PC either. And it's these urban areas where we need disadvantaged students to have Internet and PC access.

I know about the OLPC (One Laptop Per Child) and Intel Classmate PC initiatives. But those are mainly targeted at developing nations. Moreover those PC designs are rather primitive. In the US our students need access to realistically-powered systems even in elementary school. Given the state of our debt as a country, I couldn't suggest that the government underwrite free PCs any more than I can advocate the government paying for free universal Internet access. But I sure hope the increased interest and awareness in recycling PCs can put more useable systems into the right hands.


print

email

rss

Bookmark and Share

Joinpost comment



Comments


mwers73

8/27/2008 1:25 PM EDT

Maury,

I hate to say it, but you're showing your age. The point is that the rest of the world is moving or already using intelligent devices that integrate computing power and connectivity. Yes, we'll still have computers in the future, but people will rely very heavily on intelligent devices that have significant computing power and Internet connectivity for much of their daily routines. Most probably, a next-gen smartphone that's got as much or more computing power than the original Intel pentium chips. Viewing the world as PC-orientation is adequate is so 20th century. We're going to be left behind the rest of the world if we don't wake up soon. (Some would say we already are since we didn't demand adoption of one uniform cellular standard like most of the rest of the world.)

Sign in to Reply


Bill H

9/17/2008 9:05 AM EDT

Good article, but it is slightly short sided to tie universal broadband internet access to having a PC. Having the internet available independent of location and cost will open an unbelievable new frontier, and a PC will not even matter in the grand scheme.

Sign in to Reply


Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Product Parts Search

Enter part number or keyword
PartsSearch

FeedbackForm