Engineering Investigations
Comment
Data File Recovery
I was very encouraged to find this site. I wanted to thank you for this special ...
Data File Recovery
I was very encouraged to find this site. I wanted to thank you for this special ...
Sometimes a minor spec can be a major feature
Michael Hughes
2/16/2011 12:24 PM EST
The project of the month at the small contract house where I worked was the control system for a wafer loader. This machine was to extract a 3" diameter semiconductor wafers full of IC's from a "boat" full of similar wafers, orient the wafer and transfer it into a tester. When the tester finished its job, the loader would accept the wafer back and transfer it to the output "boat".
This thing was about the size of an HO model train layout and about as much fun. There were conveyor belts and elevators, spinning vacuum chucks and swinging arms that would fling wafers across the room like shiny Frisbees if you didn't handle the vacuum right.
Going down?
Most all of this hardware was working well, but the elevators for the wafer boats were proving a challenge. The boats were plastic troughs, U-shaped in cross-section with slots along their length to hold the wafers. To load the machine, the boat was stood up on end and placed on the elevator which had been previously raised to its top-most position. The control system was then supposed to lower the elevator until it detected that the bottom-most wafer in the boat was in the correct position for the mechanism to engage it and whisk it out of the boat and onward towards the maw of the tester.

It was the "correct position" part of that we were having trouble with. The spec said that boats could be partially filled, so it was up to the loader to locate the bottom most wafer in the boat. The job was assigned to a clever optical sensor that consisted of two IR LEDs flanking a photo-transistor, potted in a single case.
The photo-transistor was tightly coupled to a short piece of glass fiber that extended to the surface of the clear potting compound, so the transistor would not "see" the LEDs directly, but only the light reflected back to it. One of these sensors was placed under the elevator looking up at the wafers descending toward it. The theory was that when the reflected light signal, as sensed by the photo-transistor, reached a level corresponding to the "correct position", the control system would stop the elevator.
Reflectivity to the rescue-or not
The flaw in the theory was that the albedo of the wafers varied wildly. The backs of some wafers were perfect silver mirrors, and some were black as coal. If we set the threshold for the bright ones, we smashed the dark ones when we didn't stop the elevator in time. Setting the threshold for the dark ones left the bright ones high and out of reach.
Running out of time, we were wracking our brains for a solution.
Finally while studying the sensor data sheet for the nth time, I noticed a spec for "minimum distance of operation." The geometry of the sensor was such that as the sensor approached the reflective surface, the areas illuminated by the LEDs would eventually slip out of the field of view of the photo-transistor.
Watch out for the wall
Picture the situation by imagining yourself walking towards a wall in the dark, holding a flashlight in front of you and looking through a cardboard tube. At a distance, the flashlight illuminates a large section of the wall and you will see the light through your tube. However as you walk towards the wall, the circle of light from the flashlight will get smaller and smaller and eventually won't be visible through the tube anymore.
This happened with our sensor at about 0.1 inch, and since it was set by the geometry of the sensor, it was very repeatable. So, set the sensor threshold to detect the dirtiest wafer, drop the elevator at high speed until the sensor detects the bottom wafer, then go to low speed.
When the signal drops out, STOP! Bingo! The "correct position."
(Mike Hughes is an old farm boy who has spent the last 30 years working with successively smaller computers. He figures that by the time he’s ready to retire, the things will just about reach invisibility).
This thing was about the size of an HO model train layout and about as much fun. There were conveyor belts and elevators, spinning vacuum chucks and swinging arms that would fling wafers across the room like shiny Frisbees if you didn't handle the vacuum right.
Going down?
Most all of this hardware was working well, but the elevators for the wafer boats were proving a challenge. The boats were plastic troughs, U-shaped in cross-section with slots along their length to hold the wafers. To load the machine, the boat was stood up on end and placed on the elevator which had been previously raised to its top-most position. The control system was then supposed to lower the elevator until it detected that the bottom-most wafer in the boat was in the correct position for the mechanism to engage it and whisk it out of the boat and onward towards the maw of the tester.

It was the "correct position" part of that we were having trouble with. The spec said that boats could be partially filled, so it was up to the loader to locate the bottom most wafer in the boat. The job was assigned to a clever optical sensor that consisted of two IR LEDs flanking a photo-transistor, potted in a single case.
The photo-transistor was tightly coupled to a short piece of glass fiber that extended to the surface of the clear potting compound, so the transistor would not "see" the LEDs directly, but only the light reflected back to it. One of these sensors was placed under the elevator looking up at the wafers descending toward it. The theory was that when the reflected light signal, as sensed by the photo-transistor, reached a level corresponding to the "correct position", the control system would stop the elevator.
Reflectivity to the rescue-or not
The flaw in the theory was that the albedo of the wafers varied wildly. The backs of some wafers were perfect silver mirrors, and some were black as coal. If we set the threshold for the bright ones, we smashed the dark ones when we didn't stop the elevator in time. Setting the threshold for the dark ones left the bright ones high and out of reach.
Running out of time, we were wracking our brains for a solution.
- Detect the wafer from the side? Might work, but the wafers were thin and curved so it wasn't a sure thing, and the mechanical changes would take more time than we had.
- Use a switch? Nope, the spec called for no contact with the wafer.
Finally while studying the sensor data sheet for the nth time, I noticed a spec for "minimum distance of operation." The geometry of the sensor was such that as the sensor approached the reflective surface, the areas illuminated by the LEDs would eventually slip out of the field of view of the photo-transistor.
Watch out for the wall
Picture the situation by imagining yourself walking towards a wall in the dark, holding a flashlight in front of you and looking through a cardboard tube. At a distance, the flashlight illuminates a large section of the wall and you will see the light through your tube. However as you walk towards the wall, the circle of light from the flashlight will get smaller and smaller and eventually won't be visible through the tube anymore.
This happened with our sensor at about 0.1 inch, and since it was set by the geometry of the sensor, it was very repeatable. So, set the sensor threshold to detect the dirtiest wafer, drop the elevator at high speed until the sensor detects the bottom wafer, then go to low speed.
When the signal drops out, STOP! Bingo! The "correct position."
(Mike Hughes is an old farm boy who has spent the last 30 years working with successively smaller computers. He figures that by the time he’s ready to retire, the things will just about reach invisibility).
Navigate to related information


agk
2/17/2011 3:26 AM EST
The photo transistors used as sensors are very critical. The optical behaviour to be studied carefully in the application under various lighting conditions. One more issue out of many photo transistors one may have poor leakage specification will lead to failure of detection and the system will behave erratically!
Sign in to Reply
ManasK.RayChaudhuri
2/20/2011 8:36 PM EST
A very good article pointing out simple roots of failure.
Sign in to Reply
Sanjib.Acharya
2/17/2011 12:45 PM EST
@Michael Hughes, well written and nicely explained! Thanks for sharing your experience. Yes, sometimes we tend to ignore or overlook less important (apparently) specs. of the components in order to focus on the major features/ functionalities, which could cause a huge trouble in a crunchy situation
Sign in to Reply
lifewingmate
2/19/2011 12:56 AM EST
I echo Sanjob Acharya's sentiments. Thank you Michael for sharing your discovery so that we can all think of creative, mathematically-based solutions to make our products better. I also think your mini bio at the end of the article is clever and witty. With nanotechnology advancing forward, low power requirements tightening, the future of electronics will yield phenomenal results...but then what? after everything is THAT microscopic?
Sign in to Reply
simmysexy
2/19/2011 6:10 AM EST
I was very encouraged to find this site. I wanted to thank you for this special read. I definitely savored every little bit of it.
http://www.healthmantra.co.uk
Sign in to Reply
simmysexy
2/19/2011 6:13 AM EST
I was very encouraged to find this site. I wanted to thank you for this special read. I definitely savored every little bit of it.
http://www.healthmantra.co.uk
Sign in to Reply
ReneCardenas
2/22/2011 2:29 PM EST
Mike,
My experience has been that photo diodes or transistors tend to age and systems loose detection sensitivity if not accounted for.
Was there any issue with batch to batch or life longevity?
Sign in to Reply
t.alex
2/26/2011 7:12 AM EST
Very interesting experience to share.
Sign in to Reply
prabhakar_deosthali
2/28/2011 7:43 AM EST
Very nice article . It shows that persistence pays. and even some trivial looking information on a data sheet sometimes plays a very crucial role in your design. Those people who make accurate and comprehensive data sheets need to be rewarded! I have this experience of finding something new every time I read a data sheet of a component and many times that new discovery points to the solution of your problem.
Sign in to Reply
Aaronclar
3/1/2012 2:54 AM EST
Fantastic piece of writing! I am highly agree with the writer's point of view.
Important information corruption scenario is always a problem for the individual.
A range of recovery software applications are already designed a by the professionals, which would mean that a user can easily simply recover the missed data.
User should be well aware of the accessible personal information recovery resources making sure that they can handle the info loss condition in a optimal way.
http://www.bestfilerecoverysoftware.biz/pc-file-recovery-can-be-easily-done
Sign in to Reply
tomaderson
4/11/2012 2:28 AM EDT
This is a great sharing , i m glad to read such article. i appreciate the writer for sharing good info.keep sharing such kind of nice info thanks ...................
http://seagateharddrivedatarecovery.org/
Sign in to Reply
Data File Recovery
2/21/2013 4:31 AM EST
I was very encouraged to find this site. I wanted to thank you for this special read. I definitely savored every little bit of it.
Sign in to Reply
Data File Recovery
2/21/2013 4:35 AM EST
I was very encouraged to find this site. I wanted to thank you for this special read. I definitely savored every little bit of it.
http://www.datafilerecovery.mobi
Sign in to Reply