Military & Aerospace Blog
Insect-like robots that fly and cooperate
Anne-Francoise Pele
3/7/2012 12:00 PM EST
Vijay Kumar, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania, gave a talk at last week’s TED2012 that got some attention.
In his lab, Vijay Kumar and his team build flying quadrotors, small, agile robots that swarm, sense each other, and form ad hoc teams – for construction, surveying disasters and far more.
At TED2012, Kumar demonstrated a robot built like a cross, with four rotors, each on an end of the cross pointed straight up. Independent control of the rotors, in all directions plus yaw, gives exquisite control, he noted.


The advantage of being small is tremendous, researchers claimed. The smaller a robot, the quicker it can turn and maneuver.
Dynamics of the quadrotor is defined by mathematics in twelve-dimensional space. But there is a mathematical trick to make it tractable — and it can be done in a fraction of a second, even with moving obstacles, researchers noted.
The four-rotor robot was created by two students, Alex Kushleyev and Daniel Mellinger. It consumes 15 watts of power and is about 8 inches in diameter.
“Robots like this have many applications,” said Kumar in his speech at TED2012. “You can send them inside buildings as first responders to look for intruders, maybe look for biochemical leaks … [or they] can be used for construction and for transporting cargo.”
He continued: “Robots like this can be sent to collapsed buildings to assess the damage of disasters or sent to map nuclear radiation levels after a nuclear accident.”
The autonomous quadrotor is controlled to precisely fly along aggressive trajectories. Flips, flight through windows, and perching on surfaces are demonstrated in the video.
Surprisingly, throughout all video sequences, there is no mention about surveillance and military applications.
Do you also see both commercial and military usage? What do you think?
In his lab, Vijay Kumar and his team build flying quadrotors, small, agile robots that swarm, sense each other, and form ad hoc teams – for construction, surveying disasters and far more.
At TED2012, Kumar demonstrated a robot built like a cross, with four rotors, each on an end of the cross pointed straight up. Independent control of the rotors, in all directions plus yaw, gives exquisite control, he noted.


The advantage of being small is tremendous, researchers claimed. The smaller a robot, the quicker it can turn and maneuver.
Dynamics of the quadrotor is defined by mathematics in twelve-dimensional space. But there is a mathematical trick to make it tractable — and it can be done in a fraction of a second, even with moving obstacles, researchers noted.
The four-rotor robot was created by two students, Alex Kushleyev and Daniel Mellinger. It consumes 15 watts of power and is about 8 inches in diameter.
“Robots like this have many applications,” said Kumar in his speech at TED2012. “You can send them inside buildings as first responders to look for intruders, maybe look for biochemical leaks … [or they] can be used for construction and for transporting cargo.”
He continued: “Robots like this can be sent to collapsed buildings to assess the damage of disasters or sent to map nuclear radiation levels after a nuclear accident.”
The autonomous quadrotor is controlled to precisely fly along aggressive trajectories. Flips, flight through windows, and perching on surfaces are demonstrated in the video.
Surprisingly, throughout all video sequences, there is no mention about surveillance and military applications.
Do you also see both commercial and military usage? What do you think?
-------------------------------
If you found this article to be of interest, visit Military/Aerospace Designline where you will find the latest and greatest design, technology,
product, and news articles with regard to all aspects of military, defense and aerospace.
Navigate to related information







yukyuk
3/9/2012 9:48 AM EST
I would like to work on a project like this
Mike Johnson
Sign in to Reply
@NEALETHOMASnet
3/15/2012 8:02 AM EDT
.. It consumes 15 watts per hour ~ WATTS PER HOUR INDEED SO WHAT DOES THAT MEAN TO YOU?
Dearie me ~ your howlers proliferate evermore betraying the paucity of your expertise even as merely a populariser. You'd do well to skim a thoughtpauser that arrived same time as your geewizzer ~ take a taster at http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2012/mar/06/science-journalists-questions-exaggeration. Even better take a butchers at my grumpiatricisms indexed via @NEALETHOMASnet or skim my screentagged signout. As for the technology well had you surveyed the arena you'd have found dozens of gizmogamers, surely with more rational trirobotor and microminiaturisations 10X smaller than this, bumblebee proportions indeed. So do your legwork and deliver proper perspective.
Sign in to Reply
K1200LT Rider
3/16/2012 3:18 PM EDT
@Neal... That wasn't a very nice response. Do you normally talk like this?
Sign in to Reply
anne-francoise.pele
7/16/2012 11:25 AM EDT
All I can say is thank you for pointing out this careless mistake. I have corrected it. Of course!
Regards,
Anne-Françoise
Sign in to Reply