Extreme low power in an extreme location

Comment


DWenn

10/24/2010 11:56 AM EDT

Good points on the GPS. As I said I think it was struggling because we only gave ...

More...



Darius Pl.

10/24/2010 7:33 AM EDT

GPS unit based on almanac (satellite navigation data), its last known location ...

More...

Altitude struggles, GPS errors nearing the Summit

Darren Wenn

10/14/2010 6:48 PM EDT

The third day of the climb was a big one. There is an old adage in mountaineering circles that says ‘climb high – sleep low.’ In other words, go high for acclimatization and then return to a lower level for rest and sleep. This was definitely going to be one of those days. From the Shira campsite at 3800m, we head up to the Lava Tower at 4700m before going to the Barranco campsite at 3900m.

This was when the altitude finally started to affect a number of our group. One of the other guys felt nauseous for most of the day, and both my wife Sarah and Jenna (another of our companions) had very bad headaches. As for me, I kept with the slow walking and tried to maintain hydration, all of which helped prevent me from feeling any ill effects. (You can develop an unhealthy fascination with bushes and large rocks drinking this amount of water!) All the time, I was waiting for some signs of altitude sickness to creep in, having spoken with Chris on his return. He felt worst at the Lava Tower, so surely it was only a matter of time?

Walking slowly to prevent altitude sickness

The Lava Tower, the Western Breach and the Barranco Wall

As you pass the Lava Tower, above you is the massive Western Breach; a huge, 100,000 year old landslide that provides a tough scramble up to the summit. This route had been closed for a few years due to the risk of rock fall, although it is open now.

We can now clearly see the glaciers on the summit, and the scale of the mountain is becoming clear. You tend to think of mountains as tall pointy things, but the summit plateau of Kilimanjaro is 2-3km across. This fact reinforces its scale, when seen from below.

The Summit glaciers come into view

The hike down from the Lava Tower to the Barranco campsite took several hours and featured amazing views out over the African plains. Toward the end of today’s journey, we could see tomorrows target—the Barranco Wall, a 300m scramble up a cliff face. In reality, it is not supposed to be too bad if you like getting your hands on rock. But then, this scramble is located at 4000m and two days from rescue up a mountain; probably best not to fall.

Barranco Wall

Data logger results for the first 3 days

Shown in the below graph is the temperature and GPS-altitude data from my device, for the first few days of walking. You can see the pronounced daily temperature range and also the altitude increments as we trekked up the mountain. It can be seen that, during the first day or two of the trip, we didn’t have any valid GPS data. I believe that this was due to the Ephemeris data being out of date. A GPS satellite transmits this data every 30 seconds to 1 minute (I believe). However, when we turned on the receiver, it was only for 45 seconds. Since the batteries were inserted in the UK (in the Northern Hemisphere), I believe it took quite a few attempts before the GPS receiver was able to correctly calculate that it was now in the Southern Hemisphere and that it should concentrate on a different set of satellites.

Days 1-3 Temperature and Altitude Data

This post is part of a series chronicling the adventures of engineers Darren Wenn of Microchip Technology and Chris McAneny of Future Electronics as they prepare for and climb Africa’s famous Mt. Kilimanjaro, equipped with a special device they designed for taking measurements in extreme conditions.





Semiman_#1

10/15/2010 11:58 AM EDT

Watch you do not go too crazy on the water or you will lose too many eletrolytes.

Sign in to Reply



Etmax

10/16/2010 3:22 AM EDT

Yeah why is it that no one links electrolyte balance with dehydration?

Sign in to Reply



t.alex

10/16/2010 10:05 PM EDT

The first 2 days data was not correct! that's a big deal.

Sign in to Reply



selinz

10/21/2010 11:19 AM EDT

I've had a Garmin Palm based PDA for many years (definitley getting long in the tooth) but it still is quite a bit more accurate than my HTC cell phone GPS. This is particularly true in elevation. I work and live at about sea level and when I first turn on my phone, it shows -200 ft elevation. It eventually gets close. The Garmin is slower but more accurate. And yes, when I hop off of a plane in Japan or Europe, the Garmin takes significantly longer to find itself...

Sign in to Reply



Phil16v

10/21/2010 8:25 PM EDT

Are you sure the southern hemisphere uses different satellites? I thought that most of the satellite constellation passed over both hemispheres.

Sign in to Reply



Darius Pl.

10/24/2010 7:33 AM EDT

GPS unit based on almanac (satellite navigation data), its last known location and current time and date initiates signal search first for satellite signals that should be visible to it for given location and time (about 8 to 12 signals), plus it can compute the expected Doppler values of the signals to reduce the search space. If this fails then the GPS unit starts to look for the rest of signals out of 32 possible.
When you move more than a couple thousands of kilometers the expected signal list will not match the actual situation at the new location - the older generation GPS units will spend quite some time to find the GPS signals.

Sign in to Reply



Darius Pl.

10/24/2010 7:24 AM EDT

Yes, a bit more new GPS unit would help. They have many more HW resources to acquire GPS signals as consequence of design for a high sensitivity.
You are right about GPS data rate, but if there are signal obstructions then the GPS signals will be even more week - data errors will require repeated reception(s) of data frames.
If you can enter manually an approximate current position into your GPS unit, then this should help its acquisition process to find much faster the correct set and the correct parameters for satellite signal.
Today you can by a dedicated GPS unit (consumer class) with an inbuilt barometer. That should give you quite precise elevation.

Sign in to Reply



DWenn

10/24/2010 11:56 AM EDT

Good points on the GPS. As I said I think it was struggling because we only gave it 45 seconds to find a lock before going back to sleep. Now this was okay once we were on the mountain and walking normally but it obviously gave problems on the first few days.
Really this is down to 'operator error', one of the more common causes of failure in electronic equipment! :-)
Chris put his batteries in when in Africa and his unit started tracking correctly iummediately. Whereas I wanted to try and record the pressure changes during the flight down to Africa so I put my batteries in before flying hence causing the problem.... DOH! But at least it did catch up.
One thing I would do in retrospect would be to add a 'Sample Now' button allowing the user to force a reading at any time.

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Featured Job On
Scroll for More Jobs