datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

Max's Cool Beans

Comment


Max the Magnificent

2/4/2011 2:41 PM EST

Thanks for your feedback -- did you see my follow-on blog about the elements ...

More...



threedeept

2/4/2011 12:59 PM EST

'ways to skin a cat' struck a familiar note, as I had just sent an email to ...

More...

Periodic Tables (there are more ways to skin a cat…)

Clive Maxfield

1/21/2011 11:32 AM EST

In response to one of my earlier blogs, regular reader and “King of Comments” David Ashton sent me an email saying: “Hi Max, I Thought you might like this. It’s the brilliant Tom Lehrer putting the periodic table into song. I first heard this years ago on my car radio in Zimbabwe but did not catch who did it.   Thanks to the magic of the internet I found it again.” (Click Here to see this video).

As it happens I had seen and heard this before – but it’s such a classic that it’s always worth taking the time to listen to it once more.

Of course this reminded me of that book called The Disappearing Spoon, in which the author – Sam Kean – walks us through the elements in the periodic table regaling us with tidbits of trivia and nuggets of knowledge and stories as to the people who discovered them and how they have affected us in terms of politics, art, war, and … all sorts of things (Click Here to see my review of this book).

And then this got me to thinking about a project I was involved with a while back in which I needed to do a little research on periodic tables (it will be easier for all of us if you don’t ask why [grin]).

To be honest, I hadn’t realized just how many variations of these little rascals there are. Even the standard one we all grew up with at high school comes in so many flavors that it makes your eyes water. If you go to Google and search for Periodic Table in Google Images (which, I would just like to say is an AMAZINGLY useful resource), you are presented with a mind-numbing plethora of possibilities.


Amazingly enough they are almost all subtly different from each other. In fact, bouncing back and forth between them I still cannot work out if Scandium and Yttrium should be considered to be part of the Transition Metals or if they are more properly considered to be part of the Lanthanide Series. And should Hydrogen really be considered to simply fall into the category of "Other Non-Metals" or should it be classed as a special category all on its own?

And that's just the standard form of periodic table. I'd forgotten just how many variations there are. For example, there's a Pyramidal Representation as illustrated below:


Or there's a Spiral Presentation as shown below (and don’t get me started on the 3D representations and other weird and wonderful beasts):


And then I blundered into the Wikipedia article on Electron Shells. When I was at school things were much simpler. We didn’t know about all of the different sub-shells and how they related to the bigger shells. This was a "must read" for me – especially going through the big table showing the way in which the shells fill up with electrons. Everything starts off simply enough with the "lower elements", but look what happens when you go from Vanadium to Chromium... that was a real "eye-opener" for me (of course you probably know all of this stuff already, so you'll have to excuse my wittering on).

Part of this article features a standard representation of the periodic table, except that each "square" contains an image of the electrons and shells associated with that atom (Click Here to see the high-res image).


And then, on my meandering travels around the internet, I ran across something really interesting. This guy has created a version of the periodic table showing the elements forming the human body:


The five yellow squares represent the top five most common elements in the body; the green squares represent the next five; the blue squares represent the trace elements we need to survive; and the pink/violet boxes represent those elements you really want to avoid.

This is a really, really clever idea. On the one hand it's a simple concept... on the other hand I would never have thought about doing this myself...

I LOVE this stuff!




Max the Magnificent

1/21/2011 11:49 AM EST

If you see any other interesting presentations of the periodic table, please let me know (max@CliveMaxfield.com)

Sign in to Reply



Bob Virkus

1/21/2011 3:49 PM EST

I'm going to assume that you're familiar with Edward Tufte's work beginning with "The Visual Display of Quantitative Information." His books are beautiful explanations of how information can be enhanced through thoughtful presentation; or, more often, obscured by bad design.

My favorite Tufte work is a monograph he published in 2003, "The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint." He does not pull any punches: PowerPoint causes "foreshortening of evidence and thought, low spatial resolution, a deeply hierarchical single-path structure as the model for organizing every type of content, breaking up narrative and data into slides and minimal fragments, rapid temporal sequencing of thin information rather than focused spatial analysis, conspicuous decoration and Phluff, a preoccupation with format not content, an attitude of commercialism that turns everything into a sales pitch."

I would submit that one of the best things that corporate American and the Pentagon could do is delete PowerPoint from all of their computers.

For a laugh, search for the PowerPoint version of the Gettysburg Address.

Sign in to Reply



Max the Magnificent

1/21/2011 5:50 PM EST

Hi Bob -- thanks so much for this -- I'm not familiar with Edward Tufte's work but I will be visiting Amazon.com shortly (grin) -- Max

Sign in to Reply



David Ashton

1/21/2011 9:24 PM EST

Tiyr wish might be granted Bob - see

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/27/world/27powerpoint.html?_r=1&hp

Sign in to Reply



David Ashton

1/21/2011 9:24 PM EST

Sorry - YOUR wish - should not type so early in the morning.....

Sign in to Reply



Bob Virkus

1/25/2011 5:34 PM EST

I have two complete sets of his books in mint condition if you are interested.

Sign in to Reply



Max the Magnificent

1/25/2011 8:13 PM EST

YES I'm interested (only in one set [grin]). I would be delighted to pay the postage -- can you email me at max@CliveMaxfield.com so we can arrange the details -- thank you so much for this -- Max

Sign in to Reply



zeeglen

1/21/2011 6:17 PM EST

One of the nice things about EE Times is occasional forays into other fields of science.

Chemistry is knowing where electrons want to be. Electronics is making those electrons do what we want them to do.

Sign in to Reply



David Ashton

1/21/2011 9:00 PM EST

"King of Comments" indeed!! I thinks it's just because, being in Australia, I usually get to comment before anyone else! (Except in this case, I have been flat out the last two days....)

The internet (and Max's Cool Beans) always remind me of something Bilbo said in J.R.R. Tolkien's "Lord of the Rings":

"It's a dangerous business, Frodo, going out of your door," he used to say. "You step into the Road, and if you don't keep your feet, there is no knowing where you might be swept off to."

Google works very much the same way.

Sign in to Reply



threedeept

2/4/2011 12:59 PM EST

'ways to skin a cat' struck a familiar note, as I had just sent an email to another designer this morning using those words about periodic tables.
I have put online an early draft of sketches of many of these ways, at http://www.INNOVATION-TO-EDUCATION.COM.
These sketches will soon to appear on the back of a model kit of the Alexander Arrangement of Elements - a tool to defuse the popular negativity towards the periodic table in popular culture by presenting it in its original 3-D form. The AAE is a descendant from de Chancourtois' and Meyer's 3-D, before Mendeleev flattened it for convenience (of us all).

Sign in to Reply



Max the Magnificent

2/4/2011 2:41 PM EST

Thanks for your feedback -- did you see my follow-on blog about the elements found in the human body (http://bit.ly/eHSN6u)?

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)