Programmable Logic DesignLine Blog
Comment
Max the Magnificent
garydpdx
Max, this has moved from rumor to news. The combination of the Catapult C asset ...
Has Mentor traded its high-level synthesis (HLS) Catapult C organization?
Clive Maxfield
8/26/2011 10:33 AM EDT
I can hardly believe my ears. I just heard a rumor on John Cooley’s DeepChip.com website (Slogan = “We’re in Deep Chip Now!”) that “Effective on August 31, 2011, the High Level Synthesis organization, which produces Catapult C, will become part of a new entity with Calypto Design Systems. Mentor will be a majority shareholder in Calypto…”
And there’s more, because the rumor goes on to say that “Effective immediately, FPGA Synthesis, which produces Precision, will become part of SDD. FPGA Synthesis and the BSD group within SDD share a very similar set of customers…”
Visit www.deepchip.com/wiretap/110825.html to see the full post on Deep Chip.
Now, merging FPGA and board-level design makes sense, considering that the vast majority of FPGAs end up on circuit boards and taking into account the need to optimize both portions of the design based on board placement and pin assignment and so forth. Ultimately, the target market is one and the same (system design houses and similar); also, this removes one level of management at Mentor which equates to cost savings and (one might hope) tighter integration of the tools.
But what about Catapult C, into which Mentor have poured huge amounts of development and resources and which is (to my mind) one of the premier high-level synthesis (HLS) tools out there. It’s interesting to note that Mentor haven’t dumped Catapult C – instead they’ve made it part of Calypto Design Systems and (assuming this rumor to be true) Mentor will be a majority shareholder in Calypto.
So what is the rationale behind all of this? It seems to me that there are two possible explanations. One justification is that they are giving Catapult C a chance to grow independently, without being restricted by the whims of Mentor corporate. An alternative is that they are positioning Catapult C to sell it.
If the latter option is the case, I think they are making a big mistake. HLS is the wave for the future. Other companies like Synplicity (now Synopsys) have some very interesting technology in this area – particularly with regard to FPGAs. And then consider, for example, today’s announcement from NEC, which has just released its first dedicated FPGA version of their CyberWorkBench HLS technology (Click Here for more details).
It is going to be very interesting to see how all this plays out…
If you found this article to be of interest, visit Programmable Logic Designline where you will find the latest and greatest design, technology, product, and news articles with regard to programmable logic devices of every flavor and size (FPGAs, CPLDs, CSSPs, PSoCs...).
Also, you can obtain a highlights update delivered directly to your inbox by signing up for my weekly newsletter – just Click Here to request this newsletter using the Manage Newsletters tab (if you aren't already a member you'll be asked to register, but it's free and painless so don't let that stop you [grin]).
And there’s more, because the rumor goes on to say that “Effective immediately, FPGA Synthesis, which produces Precision, will become part of SDD. FPGA Synthesis and the BSD group within SDD share a very similar set of customers…”
Note: SDD stands for “System Design Division” and BSD stands for “Board System Division” (why not BDD = “Board Design Division”? Who knows why those who don the undergarments of authority and stride the corridors of power do what they do? It is not for we mere mortals to speculate on these matters).
Visit www.deepchip.com/wiretap/110825.html to see the full post on Deep Chip.
Now, merging FPGA and board-level design makes sense, considering that the vast majority of FPGAs end up on circuit boards and taking into account the need to optimize both portions of the design based on board placement and pin assignment and so forth. Ultimately, the target market is one and the same (system design houses and similar); also, this removes one level of management at Mentor which equates to cost savings and (one might hope) tighter integration of the tools.
But what about Catapult C, into which Mentor have poured huge amounts of development and resources and which is (to my mind) one of the premier high-level synthesis (HLS) tools out there. It’s interesting to note that Mentor haven’t dumped Catapult C – instead they’ve made it part of Calypto Design Systems and (assuming this rumor to be true) Mentor will be a majority shareholder in Calypto.
So what is the rationale behind all of this? It seems to me that there are two possible explanations. One justification is that they are giving Catapult C a chance to grow independently, without being restricted by the whims of Mentor corporate. An alternative is that they are positioning Catapult C to sell it.
If the latter option is the case, I think they are making a big mistake. HLS is the wave for the future. Other companies like Synplicity (now Synopsys) have some very interesting technology in this area – particularly with regard to FPGAs. And then consider, for example, today’s announcement from NEC, which has just released its first dedicated FPGA version of their CyberWorkBench HLS technology (Click Here for more details).
It is going to be very interesting to see how all this plays out…
If you found this article to be of interest, visit Programmable Logic Designline where you will find the latest and greatest design, technology, product, and news articles with regard to programmable logic devices of every flavor and size (FPGAs, CPLDs, CSSPs, PSoCs...).
Also, you can obtain a highlights update delivered directly to your inbox by signing up for my weekly newsletter – just Click Here to request this newsletter using the Manage Newsletters tab (if you aren't already a member you'll be asked to register, but it's free and painless so don't let that stop you [grin]).
Navigate to related information


BrianBailey
8/26/2011 10:58 AM EDT
I think there is another possibility that you didn't cover Max. Mentor is, well to be blunt, a little tight when it comes to acquisitions. I expect that all three of the big players were interested in Calypto because it id the only game in town really when it comes to the next generation of equivalence checking. Synopsys has some internal technology but never released it. So Mentor and Cadence needed this for a complete ESL flow. If Mentor could not afford to buy Calypto, then this makes sure that they control the resource and they use their own internal equity to buy it.
What I do find strange is that Vista is not coming along for the ride, which in my mind says that Mentor has less faith in that technology.
Sign in to Reply
Max the Magnificent
8/26/2011 11:51 AM EDT
Hi Brian -- thanks for this input, which is very insightful as usual ...
Sign in to Reply
garydpdx
8/26/2011 12:30 PM EDT
Max, this has moved from rumor to news. The combination of the Catapult C asset and existing equity from it minority share, appears to put Mentor into a majority position (if not in equity by percentage then in its class of shares).
And Brian, the memo leaked to John Cooley's Deep Chip states that the 'Design Creation' team with Vista (plus HDL Designer, ReqTracer, etc.) will report to Glenn Perry, who heads Embedded Systems (Nucleus, Code Sourcery, etc.) and who before that, lead a Design Creation team with the non-Vista tools.
Sign in to Reply
Max the Magnificent
8/26/2011 1:18 PM EDT
Hey -- it was a rumor when I saw it (grin)
And the fact that it's turned into news is great because it means I wasn't spreading false rumors :-)
Sign in to Reply