datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

Automotive DesignLine Blog

Comment


William Miller

4/26/2013 8:54 AM EDT

In modern world everything happens earlier than we think. Having autonomous ...

More...



ShopSAR

8/21/2012 1:09 PM EDT

Oh I heard about this, I think Google made a car that went about 200 plus miles! ...

More...

Autonomous cars: Sooner than we think?

Rick DeMeis

5/14/2012 6:32 PM EDT

Last week, the New England Motor Press Association (NEMPA) and MIT held a technology conference at the institute on the state of the art of autonomous vehicles. The experts there, along with presentations at last month's SAE Congress in Detroit, paint a picture of where the technology for self-driving vehicles stands—and how far we have to go for true autonomous operations. (Presentations from the NEMPA event should be available soon at the link above.)

One of the highlights of the SAE meeting was a presentation by Anthony Levandowski, business lead for Google's Self-Driving Car project. He noted that today "driving is the distraction" for many drivers who engage in other tasks while at the wheel. As part of the company's mission to foster innovation and meet challenges that will have a high, positive impact on society, developing technology for self-driving cars can reduce road fatalities and the more than 90% of collisions caused by human error. Google looks to furnish building blocks of such technology for industry.

Levandowski "drives" the Google vehicle to work about 60 miles one way. When he "boots up" the car, a digital world model, based on Google mapping, provides the car's location within ±5 cm, including "knowledge" of lanes, crosswalks, etc. Onboard sensors detect surrounding vehicles and objects for processing the traffic situation to determine a path to follow. He admits that construction zones challenge the mapping-based architecture because they can have "daily" changes to painted markings and safety-cone placement.

He says his commute is three quarters in the auto mode. He first started driving completely autonomously, but "certain situations need work," and now highway driving is mostly on auto. He uses his "downtime" in the car not to text but to plan out his day, and feels less stressed when arriving at work.

As for what Google has learned from the development, Levandowski notes a "time-to-collision" metric, where the vehicle travels at the same speed before preventative action is taken in an accident scenario, is less than 7.5 seconds—two seconds faster than a human driver. The robot car is also faster, better handling, and safer over a lap course and in many driving situations—which can help to remove skepticism in adopting the technology.

Interestingly, when questioned about the aftermarket for autonomous systems, Levandowski states it could be easier to bring these technologies to the public by aftermarket suppliers because their design cycles can be shorter than those of the auto OEMs.

Finally, he observes that the first autonomous applications will be limited to monitoring functions, keeping the driver in the loop rather than "being asleep in the back." Software updates can improve and expand functions, but Levandowski says a major challenge will be in handing off control of a vehicle to a driver in the event of failure. Depending on the mode of driving and what task the "driver" is engaged in when a failure develops, about upwards of 10 seconds may be needed for a person to get ready to drive after ascertaining the information needed to complete a safe transition.

At MIT
The NEMPA presentations reflected Google's experience, and added insight from the standpoint of academic researchers and automotive OEMs. Bryan Reimer, of the MIT AgeLab and New England University Transportation Center says automation will not decrease inattentive driving until the advent of totally autonomous vehicles, because drivers would not monitor such semi-autonomous systems well, becoming bored or distracted, until a more optimized way of connecting the driver to such systems is found.

BMW's Tom Baloga, U.S. VP of engineering, adds his company is concentrating on "highly automated driving" to make a good driver better. He cites development of an effective head-up display for making a car more comfortable to drive. Systems cost and liability issues will hold totally autonomous driving back, he states.

GM's Nady Boules, director of its Electrical & Controls Integration Research Laboratory, see autonomous vehicles coming in stages. First, integrated sensor technology will enable "360° safety," full-time around the car—more effective than just the periodic scan of the human eye. Such developments will lead to "cars that do not crash," and eventually to vehicles that drive themselves—the latter dependent on effective control algorithms (in addition to sensors) and non-technical concerns of government regulation, resolution of liability issues, and, not least, customer acceptance.

In fact, GM says it has enough advanced driver assistance systems in place now, that by 2016, with the addition of a lane centering function, it sees semi-autonomous operation under some conditions with Cadillac models.

Jonathan How, aerospace controls professor at MIT, observes that Google has probably advanced the push toward vehicle autonomy by five years. However, he has concerns about its map-based guidance in a complex and dynamic road environment, such as Boston's notorious street scene, with the need to handle "normal and off-normal behavior of other vehicles and pedestrians for classification and intent recognition." Other issues he voices are adverse weather operations and understanding the attention levels required for vehicle operators.

Continental's Director of Engineering Systems & Technology, Christian Schumacher, also sees 360° predictive safety systems in all vehicle types around the year 2020. These will first enable low-speed systems, for semi-automated driving, such as "traffic jam assist." Likewise, Sascha Simon, product manager for advanced product planning at Mercedes-Benz, adds, "The autonomous car for its own sake is not going to work. You need human monitoring and intervention. [Customers] want to buy a car to drive it. But in congestion, say, [automation] can be used to mitigate by taking over."

Finally, weighing in with the all important view from regulators on issues concerning vehicle automation, was David Strickland, administrator of the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) speaking at the SAE Congress. He notes three concerns: Redundancy and system safety in the event of failure; integration of the driver into the vehicle; and, perhaps important when highly automated vehicles start to appear on the roads, integration of those vehicles into the overall transportation infrastructure.

Reflecting on the latter point, I can't help but bring up the "Law of Unintended Consequences" in the form of a recent blog posting I read. This blogger said he couldn't wait until autonomous vehicle technology becomes common—this way other cars will automatically move out of his way as he works his way through traffic.


(And here is another take on this autonomous vehicle stuff.)


__________________________
Go to the Automotive Designline home page for the latest in automotive electronics design, technology, trends, products, and news. Also, get a weekly highlights update delivered directly to your inbox by signing up for our weekly automotive electronics newsletter here.




Bert22306

5/14/2012 7:06 PM EDT

I'm fairly certain that in the not too distant future, we will think back to these times and wonder why people were ever trusted to drive on their own.

Aside from the GPS and street map data inputs, such as used by the Google system, I think what's required before autonomous cars can become reality is also vehicle-to-vehicle and road-to-vehicle comms. These are the ingredients you need to accommodate all of those real-time unknowns.

Sign in to Reply



matjnewton

5/15/2012 12:38 AM EDT

Hi Bert

I'm going to jump in and disagree on this one.

Many Driverless Car safety and privacy concerns revolve around V2V. There's significant resistance within the tech community to anything that can be used to invade privacy, and they are the people we need the most as the early adopters to make this technology viable. This is notwithstanding hacking worries.

While we envisage that V2V is an inevitability we don't see it as a necessity. Cars right now drive without difficulties and they don't have V2V. Driverless Cars have far better driving ability than your average joe driver so they should be ok, at least in my opinion.

Matthew Newton
Driverless Car HQ



Sign in to Reply



Bert22306

5/15/2012 2:57 PM EDT

Hi Matthew. It seems to me that the Google system has to be augmented by real-time information of road conditions where this autonomous car is driving. So for example, is there a huge pothole in th way? Is there a stalled vehicle in the way? Is there some other obstruction that Google maps and GPS can't possibly know about?

The concerns about privacy can be dealt with. This doesn't have to divulge personal info, it only has to divulge the driving environment. I'm not sure there is any way to achieve practical autonomous vehicles with what Google has done so far as the only ingredients.

Sign in to Reply



K1200LT Rider

5/14/2012 10:08 PM EDT

I foresee another very useful function for the systems installed on autonomous vehicles. They would make great recorders for accidents and nearby, aggressive, dangerous fools on the road. I think the inputs from the video, ranging systems, etc. should be constantly recorded and analyzed for incidents that warrant a law enforcement official or agency to be notified. The data could be transmitted automatically and instantly. What a great way to catch the remaining "problems" on the road. If a system like this was in place (which I greatly hope for), the blogger who thinks the autonomous cars would move out of his way would suffer quick repercussions in the form of a fine and points on his driving record. He wouldn't be doing that for long. However, I'm already suspecting that the "invasion of privacy" whiners will do everything in their power to stop a system such as this from being put into place (the same ones who don't want cameras at intersections). We need to find a way to actually start enforcing the laws on the roads. We need to all come up with practical solutions like this for our roadways to be safe and usable in the future - with or without autonomous vehicles.

Sign in to Reply



t.alex

5/14/2012 10:09 PM EDT

How about the law? is there any addition to accommodate autonomous cars?

Sign in to Reply



Rick DeMeis

5/15/2012 12:24 AM EDT

Nevada, California, and Florida allow autonomous vehicles. Texas may soon also.

Sign in to Reply



matjnewton

5/15/2012 12:34 AM EDT

There's a great Wiki being run by Bryant Walker-Smith.

http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/wiki/index.php/Automated_Driving:_Legislative_and_Regulatory_Action

It has the full updates on the legal situation across the US.

Matthew Newton
Driverless Car HQ

Sign in to Reply



mdesm

5/15/2012 7:50 PM EDT

No they don't. There must be a driver, with a driver's license, behind the wheel of these 'driver-less' cars.

Sign in to Reply



feepingcreatures

5/17/2012 7:58 PM EDT

This is all completely ridiculous; we've got here a bunch of very clever people and expensive technology solving a problem that doesn't exist. Get human drivers off the road. Then design a road system for machines. The problem then becomes a lot simpler. It is physically impossible to mix human drivers, working within a set of rules designed for humans by humans, with computer-controlled vehicles.

Sign in to Reply



DadOf3TeenieBoppers

5/30/2012 1:01 PM EDT

Autonomous vehicles are the key to real mass transist. The current system, involving steel rail tracks able to hold multi-ton railroad cars, is obsolete and cost prohibitive. Stations are too far away from most residences for people to walk up to, and trains are too expensive to make available for on-demand use - in otherwords, the passengers must wait for the train rather than vehicle waiting for the passenger.

A system built to handle vehicles weighing less than 2000 lbs gross would not need the massive infrastructure costs. Individual vehicles would be sufficiently inexpensive that a surplus can be available for on-demand use except during peak traffic periods, stations can be very close to individual residences, and the vehicles, which would only carry a handful of passengers at a time, would be able to selectively skip those stations where current passengers are not intending to get off.

Sign in to Reply



Andrzej11

7/18/2012 3:37 PM EDT

When autonomous vehicles are shown to be much safer then human driven vehicles then an outright ban on human vehicles is inevitable. Human driving produces an annual death rate of over 30,000 people in the USA alone and most of society will view this as unacceptable. V2V is also inevitable because of improved safety and results in much higher road capacity which reduces congestion and the cost of driving.

Furthermore, speeding tickets would be a thing of the past with autonomous cars moving at their engineering limits at least on the arterial roads tempered only by the physical limits of human biology.

Sign in to Reply



t.alex

7/21/2012 3:06 AM EDT

It's gonna be long way till the ban. Humans love to drive by themselves indeed.

Sign in to Reply



ShopSAR

8/21/2012 1:09 PM EDT

Oh I heard about this, I think Google made a car that went about 200 plus miles! It is in the future just not how much in the future.

Sign in to Reply



William Miller

4/26/2013 8:54 AM EDT

In modern world everything happens earlier than we think. Having autonomous vehicles on our roads is quite possible even this year. I think the only problem is to make it legit.
I truly believe that it's our future - EVs and no car accidents at all! Clear air and healthy nation!
OOh! I look forward to it!
_______________
William - http://www.carid.com/

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)