Weird and Wacky Engineering
Comment
Bellhop
The lowest price that I can remember for gas is 29.9 cents per gallon. Now, ...
Charles J Gervasi
For most people gasoline is a tiny fraction of their expenditures. Regardless ...
Americans should stop whining about gas prices!
Clive Maxfield
5/17/2012 4:46 PM EDT
I must admit that I do tend to clench my teeth a little these days when I pop into the gas station to fill up my truck. Gas was so much cheaper when I first came to America 22 years ago… (cue fuzzy effect on the visuals and a ripple effect on the harp to indicate a flashback…)
Actually, speaking of flashbacks, I just bounced over to the 1990s Flashback site. If you take a look at the Page for 1990 (the year I first graced this country with my presence), you’ll see that the average price of a gallon of regular gas was only $1.16 (wow!) [Do you want to guess how much a gallon of gas cost back in 1970? Click Here to find out.]
So, the fact that regular gas is now something like $3.65 a gallon (I think that’s what I paid a couple of days ago) really does equate to a humongous rise in price.
But having said this, when I talk to my family and friends in the UK, I realize how lucky we are and how good we have it over here, because they are paying at least twice as much for gas.
Of course, working out exactly how much they are paying relative to how much I’m paying does tend to make my eyes water and my brain ache. First we have to juggle the fact that I pay by the gallon while they now pay by the liter … which is further confused by the fact that my mother always insists on converting those liters back into gallons in her head.
The reason this becomes really painful is that we then have to play the game that the British “Imperial” gallon is approximately 4.546 liters, as compared to the American “liquid” gallon, which equates to approximately 3.79 liters (and don’t even get me started on the lesser-used American “dry” gallon).
The trick is to come up with some way to compare how much folks in different countries actually pay for their gas relative to one another and to their citizens' wages. So I was quite excited to hear about an article on Bloomberg.com that does just this – it ranks 55 countries by average price at the pump and by "pain at the pump," where the latter is measured as a function of the percentage of average daily income needed to buy a gallon of fuel.
If you Click Here you will be taken to the first of 57 pages in a slide show that takes you through all of the countries. Alternatively, you can Click Here to be taken directly to the Grand Finale.
The bottom line is that the folks in Norway are #1 (higher is worse) when it comes to price, because they have to pay a whopping $9.69 per gallon, while the United Kingdom comes in at #9 paying $8.84 a gallon, and America comes in at #44 paying only $4.19 a gallon. (For some reason the folks at Bloomberg chose to use premium gas prices as the basis for this comparison – I personally use regular gas, but I’m reasonably confident that the relative comparison of premium-to-premium and regular-to-regular will hold true.)
The strange thing is when we come to consider the ”Pain Rankings,” which – as we previously noted – Bloomberg defines as “The percentage of average daily income needed to buy a gallon of fuel.” In this case, Americans are way down the pile at #50 out of #55, meaning that we should be feeling almost no pain whatsoever (the higher the number the better in this case). Strange to relate, Norwegians (who pay the most for their gas) come in at #48 on the pain rankings.
The thing is that using “percentage of daily income” as a measure doesn’t really cover all of the bases. Another consideration is how far you have to travel on average. In England, most folks I know in my hometown of Sheffield in Yorkshire (God’s own county) typically travel only around 5 miles to get to work (and most of them use public transport in the form of busses). By comparison, in America, a lot of people I know think nothing of driving 15 or 20 miles to work and then taking a 10 or 15 mile trip at lunchtime to visit their favorite catfish restaurant (did I mention that I live in the South Eastern part of the USA?).
Then there’s the concept of “disposable income”. If you live in a place where your house payment (mortgage or rent) and taxes account for say 75% of your income, then you are going to have less to spend on gas (in relative terms) than if these items account for only 60% of your income.
Also, as someone commented on the Bloomberg article, the impact at the pump hits people differently depending on what they do. On average, it’s probably fair to say that a 50-cent-per-gallon price hike in gas will hit a hotel maid or a retail store clerk a lot harder than it will a doctor, lawyer, or politician.
Now my head really hurts…
If you found this article to be amusing and/or of interest, visit Programmable Logic Designline where – in addition to my blogs on all sorts of "stuff" (also check out my Max's Cool Beans blog) – you will find the latest and greatest design, technology, product, and news articles with regard to programmable logic devices of every flavor and size (FPGAs, CPLDs, CSSPs, PSoCs...).
Also, you can obtain a highlights update delivered directly to your inbox by signing up for my weekly newsletter – just Click Here to request this newsletter using the Manage Newsletters tab (if you aren't already a member you'll be asked to register, but it's free and painless so don't let that stop you [grin]).
Actually, speaking of flashbacks, I just bounced over to the 1990s Flashback site. If you take a look at the Page for 1990 (the year I first graced this country with my presence), you’ll see that the average price of a gallon of regular gas was only $1.16 (wow!) [Do you want to guess how much a gallon of gas cost back in 1970? Click Here to find out.]
So, the fact that regular gas is now something like $3.65 a gallon (I think that’s what I paid a couple of days ago) really does equate to a humongous rise in price.
But having said this, when I talk to my family and friends in the UK, I realize how lucky we are and how good we have it over here, because they are paying at least twice as much for gas.
Of course, working out exactly how much they are paying relative to how much I’m paying does tend to make my eyes water and my brain ache. First we have to juggle the fact that I pay by the gallon while they now pay by the liter … which is further confused by the fact that my mother always insists on converting those liters back into gallons in her head.
The reason this becomes really painful is that we then have to play the game that the British “Imperial” gallon is approximately 4.546 liters, as compared to the American “liquid” gallon, which equates to approximately 3.79 liters (and don’t even get me started on the lesser-used American “dry” gallon).
The trick is to come up with some way to compare how much folks in different countries actually pay for their gas relative to one another and to their citizens' wages. So I was quite excited to hear about an article on Bloomberg.com that does just this – it ranks 55 countries by average price at the pump and by "pain at the pump," where the latter is measured as a function of the percentage of average daily income needed to buy a gallon of fuel.
If you Click Here you will be taken to the first of 57 pages in a slide show that takes you through all of the countries. Alternatively, you can Click Here to be taken directly to the Grand Finale.
The bottom line is that the folks in Norway are #1 (higher is worse) when it comes to price, because they have to pay a whopping $9.69 per gallon, while the United Kingdom comes in at #9 paying $8.84 a gallon, and America comes in at #44 paying only $4.19 a gallon. (For some reason the folks at Bloomberg chose to use premium gas prices as the basis for this comparison – I personally use regular gas, but I’m reasonably confident that the relative comparison of premium-to-premium and regular-to-regular will hold true.)
The strange thing is when we come to consider the ”Pain Rankings,” which – as we previously noted – Bloomberg defines as “The percentage of average daily income needed to buy a gallon of fuel.” In this case, Americans are way down the pile at #50 out of #55, meaning that we should be feeling almost no pain whatsoever (the higher the number the better in this case). Strange to relate, Norwegians (who pay the most for their gas) come in at #48 on the pain rankings.
The thing is that using “percentage of daily income” as a measure doesn’t really cover all of the bases. Another consideration is how far you have to travel on average. In England, most folks I know in my hometown of Sheffield in Yorkshire (God’s own county) typically travel only around 5 miles to get to work (and most of them use public transport in the form of busses). By comparison, in America, a lot of people I know think nothing of driving 15 or 20 miles to work and then taking a 10 or 15 mile trip at lunchtime to visit their favorite catfish restaurant (did I mention that I live in the South Eastern part of the USA?).
Then there’s the concept of “disposable income”. If you live in a place where your house payment (mortgage or rent) and taxes account for say 75% of your income, then you are going to have less to spend on gas (in relative terms) than if these items account for only 60% of your income.
Also, as someone commented on the Bloomberg article, the impact at the pump hits people differently depending on what they do. On average, it’s probably fair to say that a 50-cent-per-gallon price hike in gas will hit a hotel maid or a retail store clerk a lot harder than it will a doctor, lawyer, or politician.
Now my head really hurts…
If you found this article to be amusing and/or of interest, visit Programmable Logic Designline where – in addition to my blogs on all sorts of "stuff" (also check out my Max's Cool Beans blog) – you will find the latest and greatest design, technology, product, and news articles with regard to programmable logic devices of every flavor and size (FPGAs, CPLDs, CSSPs, PSoCs...).
Also, you can obtain a highlights update delivered directly to your inbox by signing up for my weekly newsletter – just Click Here to request this newsletter using the Manage Newsletters tab (if you aren't already a member you'll be asked to register, but it's free and painless so don't let that stop you [grin]).
|
|
|
|
|
Navigate to related information
SteveD_Aus
5/17/2012 8:50 PM EDT
Hi Max, probably the reason they use the premium price is availability. In Australia we have 91, 95 and 98 octane petrol (if you say "gas" here, we'll think LPG) but I don't thing Europe offers less than 95. Hence if you buy a Euromobile you have to pull up at the '95' pump unlike most of our local machines.
Then there's the tax component of that price. We're currently paying 145...160 cents per litre of which about 40 cents is federal tax and then there's a 10% GST (VAT) on top of that.
Sign in to Reply
Max the Magnificent
5/18/2012 10:07 AM EDT
In America the three typical octane ratings are 87 (Regular), 89 (Mid-Grade), and 93 (Premium)
Sign in to Reply
James D
5/18/2012 12:14 AM EDT
Well mister, its not that we are whining about it, but even if we do we have every right. I understand that gas in Europe is way much expensive than in States, but tell me who in Europe drives more than 140 miles a day to go to work and back, let me guess probably a few or none. This is the difference between europeans and americans, we do drive a lot to work, Europeans don't so we have every right to whine about it. Have a great day.
Sign in to Reply
BrianBailey
5/18/2012 10:01 AM EDT
You could always move closer to where you work. That is what a European would do.
Sign in to Reply
SteveD_Aus
5/20/2012 7:32 PM EDT
Not all, at least in Germany which is very decentralised. One of my colleagues commutes about an hour each way (depending on the Autobahn traffic!) but he has converted his diesel Mercedes to run on rape seed oil, like ethanol for the diesel world. There are worse ways than commuting to work when a stretch of autobahn is involved, even with fuel at that price! ;-)
Sign in to Reply
Max the Magnificent
5/18/2012 10:04 AM EDT
Maybe I should have used a different title for this column, like "Those of us who are living in America should stop whining about gas prices!" because I live here too ... but the rule of thumb is that shorter column titles are better :-)
Sign in to Reply
SteveD_Aus
5/20/2012 7:29 PM EDT
At least it seems you have editorial control over you headlines, rather than being at the mercy of someone else!
Actually, that sound like a good post...
Sign in to Reply
Max the Magnificent
5/21/2012 10:31 AM EDT
Unless enough people complain to those who don the undergarments of authority and stride the corridors of power -- in which case I receive a swift slap around the back of my head and told to "not do it again" :-)
Sign in to Reply
KB3001
5/20/2012 8:49 PM EDT
That's actually a good point, James D. Should we thus surmise that New Yorkers for instance complain less than MidWesterners about petrol prices?
Sign in to Reply
Duane Benson
5/21/2012 11:30 AM EDT
A while back I read that on long-term average, in the U.S., you've been able to buy three gallons of gas for one hour of minimum wage labor. At the time a mental calculation through the experiences that I've had more or less confirmed this. Right now you can buy about two gallons for an hour of minimum wage.
I do agree that it's very difficult to form a fair comparison country to country with any form of accuracy. There are just too many variables. But I'm not really sure that such a comparison is even relevant. On the one hand, as human beings, the "you should feel lucky because someone else has it so much worse" argument tends to ring hollow in most of our brains.
On the other hand, here in the U.S., at worst, most of us have so much more than the vast majority of the rest of the world that we really should just sit down and count our blessings.
There's an Internet meme running around called "First-world-problems." Here's an example I pulled from the website of that name: “The rental car I got on vacation had plates from a different state than the one I was visiting, so I looked like a tourist.”
Yes, there are some pretty poor people in this country, but as a percentage, how many of us face the prospect of starvation? How many of us face the prospect of having assault rifles thrust into the hands of our kids at age 12? I'll go ahead put $80.00 into my gas tank and just be glad I live here.
Sign in to Reply
Charles J Gervasi
5/23/2012 1:59 PM EDT
For most people gasoline is a tiny fraction of their expenditures. Regardless of all those head-hurting numbers, it's simple to look at the cost of fuel versus other things we buy: groceries, medical expenses, housing, depreciation on our cars, vacations. Fuel costs are trifling.
Sign in to Reply
Bellhop
5/24/2012 3:02 PM EDT
The lowest price that I can remember for gas is 29.9 cents per gallon. Now, that's closer to the "cents off" per gallon that you get from your supermarket bonus card.
Sign in to Reply