Blog
Comment
help.fulguy
Jim and the rest of the EETimes keep tooting ARM's horn...Performance of ARM ...
Chipsoiguy
5 reasons why Windows RT should be important
Jim McGregor
10/12/2012 2:58 PM EDT
Last but not least...
Fourth, by sharing the new programming model and interface, it will be easier for software developers to provide solutions to all the Windows platforms going forward. This has proven valuable to the Android platform. Unlike Android, however, Microsoft will likely maintain a tighter control on the platform, which will reduce the potential for industry fragmentation.
And finally, supporting ARM-based platforms will help Microsoft move to a more internet-focused business model, which the company has already begun to do through both cloud-based applications and services like Office 365, Skype, and Microsoft Cloud. The shift to an internet-focused business model is a must for Microsoft to compete against Google and other internet powerhouses, and the use of hosted and hybrid applications shifts some of the system requirements of many consumer electronics platforms, especially mobile where the ARM architecture is dominant.
But several things need to occur for Windows RT to succeed. This includes the same level of promotion and support from Microsoft as given to Windows 8 and Windows Phone; an equivalent or better user experience than Windows 8, Apple, and Android platforms; and a complete internet platform and strategy from Microsoft. Based on Microsoft’s promotional strategy to-date it would seem that the company is not going to promote Windows RT as aggressively as it should. In regard to the user experience relative to other platforms, the demo units in circulation thus far are not up to par with the competition, especially the Apple platforms.
The user experience on the new Windows RT platforms is good, but there are quirks, such as not being able to switch some applications from landscape viewing to portrait viewing, that some users may find annoying. While some of these quirks will likely be eliminated in future releases, it is doubtful that they will be changed before the launch later this month. And in terms of an internet strategy, Microsoft is putting the necessary pieces in place, but it still appears more piecemeal then a cohesive strategy. In addition, Microsoft has failed to promote a complete cloud solution.
This does not diminish the importance of Windows RT, because it does mark some major changes in the industry. Unfortunately, those changes are likely to take several years and the impact of the launch will be far less than it could or should be for Microsoft, Microsoft’s Windows RT partners, and the industry. But then again, even the adoption of the Windows 8 will take several years.
Jim McGregor
TIRIAS Research
Founder/Principal Analyst
Fourth, by sharing the new programming model and interface, it will be easier for software developers to provide solutions to all the Windows platforms going forward. This has proven valuable to the Android platform. Unlike Android, however, Microsoft will likely maintain a tighter control on the platform, which will reduce the potential for industry fragmentation.
And finally, supporting ARM-based platforms will help Microsoft move to a more internet-focused business model, which the company has already begun to do through both cloud-based applications and services like Office 365, Skype, and Microsoft Cloud. The shift to an internet-focused business model is a must for Microsoft to compete against Google and other internet powerhouses, and the use of hosted and hybrid applications shifts some of the system requirements of many consumer electronics platforms, especially mobile where the ARM architecture is dominant.
But several things need to occur for Windows RT to succeed. This includes the same level of promotion and support from Microsoft as given to Windows 8 and Windows Phone; an equivalent or better user experience than Windows 8, Apple, and Android platforms; and a complete internet platform and strategy from Microsoft. Based on Microsoft’s promotional strategy to-date it would seem that the company is not going to promote Windows RT as aggressively as it should. In regard to the user experience relative to other platforms, the demo units in circulation thus far are not up to par with the competition, especially the Apple platforms.
The user experience on the new Windows RT platforms is good, but there are quirks, such as not being able to switch some applications from landscape viewing to portrait viewing, that some users may find annoying. While some of these quirks will likely be eliminated in future releases, it is doubtful that they will be changed before the launch later this month. And in terms of an internet strategy, Microsoft is putting the necessary pieces in place, but it still appears more piecemeal then a cohesive strategy. In addition, Microsoft has failed to promote a complete cloud solution.
This does not diminish the importance of Windows RT, because it does mark some major changes in the industry. Unfortunately, those changes are likely to take several years and the impact of the launch will be far less than it could or should be for Microsoft, Microsoft’s Windows RT partners, and the industry. But then again, even the adoption of the Windows 8 will take several years.
Jim McGregor
TIRIAS Research
Founder/Principal Analyst
|
|
|
|
|
Navigate to related information
eastofeastside
10/12/2012 6:31 PM EDT
LIKE AN APPLE: Microsoft will design their own ARM chip based on an ARM Mali graphics core. WinRT will run on a dedicated Microsoft Windows Metro Processor (No more Qualcomm, Nvidia fragmentation). TBA '13.
Sign in to Reply
Chipsoiguy
10/13/2012 3:58 PM EDT
eastifeastside,
Intel's poor lack of SOC focus pushed M-soft to also move its software to Arm with Windows RT including Office. Yes, plus Apple and Samsung (and likely soon M-soft) can now design their own Arm SOCs chips and this completely changes the business model in semiconductors. It did not have to play out like this. A friend of mine recently left Intel. He said the silicon process technology team at Intel has unbelievable focus with methodologies like "Copy Exactly" but the team also lacks vision and understanding of the designer needs for the mobile SOC market (like value of FDSOI vs finfet). He did not think workable for Intel to integrate LTE baseband with Atom on SOC until perhaps 2015 and even then it would still not be cost competitive with TSMC. He said even as of a few weeks ago the finfet SOC models in the development kit were still unstable for mixed signal designers and the finfet process variation was difficult for methodologies.
Sign in to Reply
help.fulguy
10/15/2012 8:53 PM EDT
Jim and the rest of the EETimes keep tooting ARM's horn...Performance of ARM systems suck
Sign in to Reply