Blog
Comment
moronda
iniewski
Yeah, I know...but if you are fighting a bigger guy would you rather try to ...
Silicon Valley Nation: ARM's expansion challenge
Brian Fuller
11/2/2012 4:30 PM EDT
SANTA CLARA, Calif. -- ARM this week sketched out a vision of moving methodically into servers and deeper into embedded, expanding its reach from a dominant position in mobile systems.
There's an architecture, a vision, a market need and an evolving ecosystem. A lot of great generals throughout history had similar ambitions but overreached and outran their supply lines. What's different today?
History is littered with powerful companies that dominated a market and pushed their technology into new areas, thinking their brand, technology or manufacturing would carry the day. Companies often overreach, mistakenly thinking applications will embrace the technology rather than the other way around. A decade ago, Intel was poised to crash the networking communications party. Didn't work. Different considerations, different sales cycle than the PC industry. More competition too. In addition to hubris, companies simply can lose focus or suffer from in-fighting and tech turf battles.
Landmines?
I'd wager that ARM's expansion into embedded and push into servers won't blow up in its face. Embedded design considerations aren't too far afield from mobile phones and tablets, and ARM already has a presence in many embedded systems.
Servers are a different animal altogether, but the reason ARM probably won't experience an Intel moment is structural. ARM is a step removed from the sturm und drang of a given market in that it defines a relevant architecture and lets partners run with the ball (and assume the risk).
It has no capital equipment skin in the game, and it studiously builds an infrastructure community (standards, software, peripherals) to raise the odds of success. Management and engineering seem conservative but not overly cautious.
For its drive into servers, it's enlisted a more-than-willing partner in AMD, already has success with Calxeda and is actively managing the design conversation through things, like HSA (Heterogeneous System Architecture) Foundation and TrustZone. This isn't to say Intel isn't great at seeding a market and building community; it is. But Intel's manufacturing exposure is what makes any expansion a higher-risk endeavor.
Next: Warren East's view
Navigate to related information


iniewski
11/2/2012 7:17 PM EDT
Not sure I understand...why does ARM need to go to servers? mobile is not enough???
Sign in to Reply
peter.clarke
11/5/2012 5:41 AM EST
@Kris
Correct.
Businesses, like sharks, have to keep moving forward.
I remember reading ARM's revamped "vision statement" about six years ago.
It read something like this: "ARM intends to be the preferred digital architecture in everything."
At that time ARM was big in mobile and trying in other sectors and vision statements were all the rage.
I did a double take at the time but i have got used to the idea of "first mobile, then the universe."
Sign in to Reply
MikeSmith2011
11/5/2012 1:26 PM EST
Their main turf (ultramobile) is under attack by Intel so they have to respond.
Sign in to Reply
iniewski
11/5/2012 1:32 PM EST
Yeah, I know...but if you are fighting a bigger guy would you rather try to defend yourself where you are strong (mobile) or would you go and attack the bigger guy where he is strong (servers)?
Sign in to Reply
jmrowca
11/2/2012 8:08 PM EDT
because of the lower power vs Intel for the supe compute horsepower. It's green
Sign in to Reply
rick.merritt
11/5/2012 12:45 PM EST
I'm no microcontroller guru, but my sense is ARM is pretty far along in surrounding that market in which a few remaining proprietary architectures have circled their wagons.
As for servers, ARM still has some heavy lifting to do in ecosystem software and the key 64-bit chips won't even arrive until 2014, so we are just in the preface of this book.
Sign in to Reply
iniewski
11/5/2012 12:58 PM EST
I agree Rick...I think it is going to be long and uphill road for ARM to conquer server space...despite Peter's response I am still not convinced why they don't just focus on mobile which is a huge market on its own to propel them into the top 10 semi vendors shortly...kris
Sign in to Reply
MikeSmith2011
11/5/2012 1:32 PM EST
Servers is a gamble for ARM. They have very little invested in it. They are counting on their partners - Calxeda, AppliedMicro, AMD and others to invest millions and take the risk. All they have to do is to define the architecture, work on enabling the ecosystem and stand back and watch the battle.
Quite clever.
Sign in to Reply
moronda
11/6/2012 6:29 AM EST
MIPS just got bought by Imagination.
http://www.zdnet.com/chip-designer-mips-acquired-for-60m-patents-sold-for-350m-7000006969/
Sign in to Reply