Blog
Comment
CHARLIE.THOMPSON
Dave didn't see the shift to tablets. Wasn't ready.
CHARLIE.THOMPSON
But not in ISIL's current form. Losing BU's must be cut first.
Silicon Valley Nation: Intersil's Bell resigns, what's next?
Brian Fuller
12/14/2012 1:00 PM EST
Reconciling paths
More importantly, Ohr said, Intersil may have had a hard time understanding what type of analog business it was in, whether it was the commodity standard parts business (a la Linear Tech and the old National Semiconductor) or more application-specific/custom parts (where Maxim is trying to move).
These are sometimes truly difficult paths to reconcile.
"Shockingly few companies are in a position to address both businesses under the same roof," Ohr said. "Intersil may have spent too many years thinking it could do that."
But CEOs do not operate in a vacuum. At the end of the day, Bell becomes the face of investor discontent, but the board needs to reassess itself. The good news is, it may already have done so.
Donald Macleod, who now serves as chairman, joined the board in September, the first new member in six years. Macleod spent most of his career at National Semiconductor, and, by some accounts, was the secret to then-CEO Brian Halla's success when he served as Halla's operations chief.
For now, 10-year board member James Diller (retired Elantec Semiconductor chairman) is Intersil's interim president and CEO.
We'll see how Macleod and the board steer Intersil forward--whether it's farther along the application-specific path or back into commodity parts. It's a company with a good brand and laudable technology, and there's time, which they bought this weekend with Wall Street.
Time indeed, but not a lot.
Related stories:
--Silicon Valley Nation: Distracted driving opportunity
--Silicon Valley Nation: Talent gap
More importantly, Ohr said, Intersil may have had a hard time understanding what type of analog business it was in, whether it was the commodity standard parts business (a la Linear Tech and the old National Semiconductor) or more application-specific/custom parts (where Maxim is trying to move).
These are sometimes truly difficult paths to reconcile.
"Shockingly few companies are in a position to address both businesses under the same roof," Ohr said. "Intersil may have spent too many years thinking it could do that."
But CEOs do not operate in a vacuum. At the end of the day, Bell becomes the face of investor discontent, but the board needs to reassess itself. The good news is, it may already have done so.
Donald Macleod, who now serves as chairman, joined the board in September, the first new member in six years. Macleod spent most of his career at National Semiconductor, and, by some accounts, was the secret to then-CEO Brian Halla's success when he served as Halla's operations chief.
For now, 10-year board member James Diller (retired Elantec Semiconductor chairman) is Intersil's interim president and CEO.
We'll see how Macleod and the board steer Intersil forward--whether it's farther along the application-specific path or back into commodity parts. It's a company with a good brand and laudable technology, and there's time, which they bought this weekend with Wall Street.
Time indeed, but not a lot.
Related stories:
--Silicon Valley Nation: Distracted driving opportunity
--Silicon Valley Nation: Talent gap
|
|
|
|
|
Navigate to related information
truekop
12/14/2012 2:03 PM EST
Intersil should ideally merge with one of the big analog players. Their power management portfolio should be a very good fit.
@ Brian any insights into possible merger of Intersil with one of the large Analog Players(ADI or Maxim or Linear)
Sign in to Reply
Comfortable
12/14/2012 2:28 PM EST
Power management is a good fit? THAT is the problem. Power management has become commodity. Their problem is a lack of diversity that should be well under way by now.
Sign in to Reply
SP_#3
12/14/2012 7:19 PM EST
mcleod will hwelp sort that out - after all he sold national to ti because he couldnt make things work. woe is the plight of the intersil employees
Sign in to Reply
Brian Fuller2
12/19/2012 4:13 PM EST
No insights, but given that Maxim seems more open to acquisition and Linear just made its first-ever acquisition (Dust Networks) last year, the possibility is definitely there.
Or a big digital player in need of analog expertise might consider it.
Sign in to Reply
CHARLIE.THOMPSON
12/20/2012 7:50 AM EST
But not in ISIL's current form. Losing BU's must be cut first.
Sign in to Reply
CHARLIE.THOMPSON
12/20/2012 7:49 AM EST
At a P/E of over 100 don't expect any larger company to pick up ISIL without considerable fat trimming.
Sign in to Reply
truekop
12/14/2012 2:45 PM EST
@comfortable i understand that is the problem and was offering a possible solution which would be to merge with a bigger analog player with a slightly weaker presence in the power management market...
Sign in to Reply
sranje
12/15/2012 12:56 PM EST
Dave Bell is certainly among the most respected CEOs among analog IC companies. His expertise in Power IC business is also legendary and illustrated by visionary GaN-on-Silicon IC patents.
One of the problems is the slow-down in PC business - one of the core revenue source for Intel. Another might the ever-increasing dominance of all things power by TI.
One should certainly wish well to Dave and commend him for his integrity and leadership.
Sign in to Reply
sranje
12/15/2012 12:59 PM EST
Ooops - Intel should have been Intersil.
Thinking about the rumors on Intel-nVidia and the new CEO there... If that happens it would be an earthquake event -- but perhaps also timely and necessary
Sign in to Reply
Comfortable
12/16/2012 2:25 PM EST
If TI is dominating power, then please explain how Dialog has grown from $85 Million in 2005 to $750 Million in 2012. Everyone in power semiconductors is flat to down for the past several years. Those guys from Stuttgart are growing at 28%!
[Answer: Apple thinks Dialog power is good enough. 25,000 patents and the world leadership of TI doesn't count. That was my point about why high volume, high margin power semiconductors are old-hat. It's over. Time to move on to move valuable products.]
Sign in to Reply
CHARLIE.THOMPSON
12/20/2012 7:50 AM EST
Dave didn't see the shift to tablets. Wasn't ready.
Sign in to Reply
sranje
12/15/2012 1:02 PM EST
Ooops - "Intel" should have been Intersil
Too distracted about the rumors on Intel-nVidia...;-))
Sign in to Reply
pmoyle111
12/17/2012 4:21 PM EST
Or conversely, do our CEOs tend to pack their boards with "their own guys"
it is circular - ceo's from one company are the board members of another and vise versa. Then you just have a mesh of back scratching....
Sign in to Reply
Brian Fuller2
12/19/2012 4:16 PM EST
Absolutely right, but I'm not sure whether the answer is more "outsiders"... at the end of the day, it's a deeply technical industry that needs technical leadership... and maybe more vigilant investors....?
Sign in to Reply
SemiRunner
12/19/2012 4:58 PM EST
I have to agree with previous posts pointing to the fact that Dave Bell is an outstandig leader and his work at Intersil was a challenging endeavor. I generally feel that Wall St pressure on BOD's is causing a lot of problems for companies like Intersil that want to move into new growth markets. The change expectations are too high and the time allowed is too short. Look around the the valley at numerous companies that are fully capable of moving into a new markets but are now allowed because of short sighted boards. My opinion is that Dave Bell had the company on the right track but the time required was too short.
Sign in to Reply
CHARLIE.THOMPSON
12/20/2012 7:46 AM EST
Dave Bell did not have the company on the right track. He purchased too many "loser" companies. The Board finally figured it out. 3/4 of the companies were an op-ex drag and destined to stay that way for years to come. Hype doesn't pay the bills.
Sign in to Reply