Blog
Crowdsourcing Breast Cancer Research
Brian Durwood, ImpulseC
12/11/2012 4:25 PM EST
OK, I am totally unqualified to write this post other than having faith that solutions for entrenched issues can come from the oddest sources. And, after spending 30 years as a frequent subcontractor to medical device manufacturers, I am aware that the likelihood of medical breakthrough is painfully (but appropriately) throttled by the mainstream approval process. Medical research is kept safe and slow by appropriate controls and the high cost of effective research. This hampers crowd sourcing[1], garage shops[2], and skunk works[3]... some of the coolest building blocks of nerds. Most of us nerds want to help and – at the same time – do no harm.
My off the wall suggestions:
This might work by creating a “bazaar[4]” level grass roots effort – almost an X prize – to encourage unorthodox ideas towards a solution; a collaborative, open-field look at the problem.
For breast cancer, a mammogram is still – despite decades of use – an imperfect tool. In other branches of technology there are ways to find material anomalies via sonar, radar, electrical conduction, mass analysis, and other. There are analytical tools that can find an oil deposit in a mile of shale. Why not consider the possible medical applications of these technologies? Can a non-medical technology be used to find a lump in a breast and then tell if that lump is of concern or not?
A possible process:
What’s to lose? It may be a “million monkey[5]” type of solution, but where’s the harm in opening up the dialog to unorthodox sources of innovation?
Comments? If there is enough interest in this (via comments), I will take it upon myself to progress things to the next level.
[1] Presenting an idea to communities, e.g. via Kickstarter, to see if there are others of common mind that will help through collaboration or funding.
[2] E.g. Jobs and Wozniak building the original Apple in their garage.
[3] Referring to the “good old days” when corporations quietly enabled engineers to create something unorthodox without official sanction.
[4] Google “the Cathedral vs. the Bazaar” wherein the latter decentralizes the creative effort and encourages sharing. Linux is a stellar example of the latter.
[5] One explanation of infinity is that if an infinite number of monkeys sit at infinite typewriters, one will write all of Shakespeare’s work on the first go.
If you found this article to be interest, visit Microcontroller / MCU Designline where – in addition to my Max's Cool Beans blogs on all sorts of "stuff" – you will find the latest and greatest design, technology, product, and news articles with regard to all aspects of designing and using microcontrollers.
Also, you can obtain a highlights update delivered directly to your inbox by signing up for my weekly newsletter – just Click Here to request this newsletter using the Manage Newsletters tab (if you aren't already a member you'll be asked to register, but it's free and painless so don't let that stop you [grin]).
Last but certainly not least, make sure you check out all of the discussions and other information resources at All Programmable Planet. For example, in addition to blogs by yours truly, microcontroller expert Duane Benson is learning how to use FPGAs to augment (sometimes replace) the MCUs in his robot (and other) projects.
My off the wall suggestions:
- Redefine the problem so nerds outside of the medical industry can contribute.
- Go outside the (medical) box for solutions and tools. Include some of the incredibly high resolution, big data solutions, and Military solutions that work well.
- Crowd source ideas as building blocks. Share, share, share... and see what happens.
This might work by creating a “bazaar[4]” level grass roots effort – almost an X prize – to encourage unorthodox ideas towards a solution; a collaborative, open-field look at the problem.
For breast cancer, a mammogram is still – despite decades of use – an imperfect tool. In other branches of technology there are ways to find material anomalies via sonar, radar, electrical conduction, mass analysis, and other. There are analytical tools that can find an oil deposit in a mile of shale. Why not consider the possible medical applications of these technologies? Can a non-medical technology be used to find a lump in a breast and then tell if that lump is of concern or not?
A possible process:
- Get the medical pros to define the problem. The nerd community needs to know the specs of what is being looked for. Contribute all the mass, electrical and other characteristic data to the public, for the public good. Define goals in terms of allowable true and false, negative and positive diagnoses.
- Get donations from tool makers (Impulse is “in” if this takes off) to offset some of the challenges. Impulse works regularly in processing resolutions and data rates difficult to achieve by other methods. We’ll donate licenses if the rest of the companies join in.
- Have an academic group judge, re-define, publish and otherwise be the janitors of the bazaar. Don’t interfere or create bottlenecks. Just fix stuff and get out of the way. Publish on a Wiki, as close to real time as possible. Assume that most ideas are false starts towards something useful. Note: Impulse is regularly approached by thoughtful professors seeking thesis topics that actually pertain to business. Students prefer to work on something pertinent.
- Attract some heavy hitters when it comes time to commercialize and FDA-ize the results. Being a vain American, I’m hoping we lead, but I’m more of a fan of women than country borders so I’m voting first for a cure. This will be a lucrative solution if it works. Other countries are not constrained by our medical technology safeties. If they reach it first and patent it, the window for a US based growth area is reduced.
What’s to lose? It may be a “million monkey[5]” type of solution, but where’s the harm in opening up the dialog to unorthodox sources of innovation?
Comments? If there is enough interest in this (via comments), I will take it upon myself to progress things to the next level.
[1] Presenting an idea to communities, e.g. via Kickstarter, to see if there are others of common mind that will help through collaboration or funding.
[2] E.g. Jobs and Wozniak building the original Apple in their garage.
[3] Referring to the “good old days” when corporations quietly enabled engineers to create something unorthodox without official sanction.
[4] Google “the Cathedral vs. the Bazaar” wherein the latter decentralizes the creative effort and encourages sharing. Linux is a stellar example of the latter.
[5] One explanation of infinity is that if an infinite number of monkeys sit at infinite typewriters, one will write all of Shakespeare’s work on the first go.
If you found this article to be interest, visit Microcontroller / MCU Designline where – in addition to my Max's Cool Beans blogs on all sorts of "stuff" – you will find the latest and greatest design, technology, product, and news articles with regard to all aspects of designing and using microcontrollers.
Also, you can obtain a highlights update delivered directly to your inbox by signing up for my weekly newsletter – just Click Here to request this newsletter using the Manage Newsletters tab (if you aren't already a member you'll be asked to register, but it's free and painless so don't let that stop you [grin]).
Last but certainly not least, make sure you check out all of the discussions and other information resources at All Programmable Planet. For example, in addition to blogs by yours truly, microcontroller expert Duane Benson is learning how to use FPGAs to augment (sometimes replace) the MCUs in his robot (and other) projects.
Navigate to related information


mac_cpt
12/11/2012 8:07 PM EST
"One explanation of infinity is that if an infinite number of monkeys sit at infinite typewriters, one will write all of Shakespeare’s work on the first go."
Of course another monkey will reproduce the complete works of Asimov and a third will reproduce every Pratchett. But what really shows how big infinite is is the fact that an infinite number of monkeys will produce original and even better works, making those 3 authors look like some pretty primitive primates indeed...
Sign in to Reply
Jazz Hands
12/12/2012 9:12 AM EST
There is a new crowd sourcing website called cureLAuncher that is designed to promote cancer research and allow the public to fund individual projects. www.curelauncher.com offers medical researchers a forum for funding. It also offers people with cancer access to a huge database of clinical trials seeking patients. It's an amazing idea and I hope it catches on.
Sign in to Reply
sfp
12/13/2012 3:23 PM EST
My wife just cured her stage 4 cancer in two weeks with alternative medicine based on cyanides from apricot seeds. The cure (since it cures it is not a treatment) is obviously not available in the US or Europe.
You can put all the monkeys you want, but they will end up in jail if the industry does not want you to cure cancer.
Sign in to Reply
gurudatha
12/15/2012 10:57 AM EST
I like the idea presented in this article. I am a student researcher and as a early career researcher I think, I and my peers will enjoy having access to the problems, data and other research materials. These ideas may even start as projects in graduate courses, which sometime tend to grow into thesis research and pickup some momentum.
I agree when you say "most ideas are false starts towards something useful". But I would argue that such a start may easily lead to further development by professors, etc.
Sign in to Reply
ljgoldberg
12/15/2012 4:09 PM EST
Been there, doing that...
Crowd sourced research on his brain cancer described in a TED lecture:
http://www.crowdsourcing.org/article/ted-fellow-uses-crowdsource-approach-to-treat-his-brain-cancer/18985
Best wishes for a good outcome.
Sign in to Reply