datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

Programmable Logic DesignLine Blog

Comment


Max the Magnificent

3/28/2013 5:11 PM EDT

I could delete their comment, but then your response wouldn't make any sense :-)

More...



OmegaMan

3/19/2013 9:47 AM EDT

Sadly, the EETimes blogs have become a haven for spammers. You should prevent ...

More...

Am I easily pleased, or easily fooled?

Clive Maxfield

3/12/2013 3:28 PM EDT

Way back in the mists of time that we used to call the early 2000s, I first subscribed to the Knology cable company for my Telephone, TV, and Internet services.

I no longer recall what service I used before, but I do remember how radically different and super-duper I found Knology to be by comparison.

All went well until about six years ago when we moved into a new house and discovered that the only TV service we could receive was via satellite from DIRECTV. One upside was that this was the first time we'd had a DVR (which I found to be amazing). One downside was that we had to get our telephone and Internet services via AT&T.

I have to say that the DIRECTV channel line-up and picture quality was superb. However, in addition to the fact that we kept on losing reception in the middle of a storm (which is, arguably, the time when you need it most), the combined AT&T / DIRECTV bill made my eyes water, and it kept on inching up year-by-year (the little scamps).

The end result was that, about three years ago, when the folks from Knology finally noticed that our subdivision existed and decided to offer service there, we decided to switch back.

Arrggghh! I generally try to find something nice to say about everything, but I'm struggling here. OK, to be fair, all of the folks who work for Knology with whom I have come into contact (in the service center, for example, and also the technicians who have visited our home) have been great (having said this, we still get only a very "blocky" digital picture in the master bedroom).

Also, the "look-and-feel" usage model of the Knology TV controller doesn’t come close to that of DIRECTV in any respect. For example, when we were watching a movie on DIRECTV, my wife (Gina The Gorgeous) used to enjoy the ability to find out which actors were in the film, and to then look up information on those actors (it kept her busy for hours :-) With Knology, by comparison, you are lucky to be able to work out what film you are watching in the first place.

Or, to take another example, if you were "fast-forwarding" on DIRECTV until you hit a scene of interest and pressed the "Play" button, the system would automatically rewind a little to compensate for your response time (or lack thereof). Furthermore, the amount of time the system rewound was a function of how fast you'd been going in the first place. Now that was smart. Suffice it to say that no similar capability is available on Knology.

Over time, and I say this with love, I've come to believe that Knology's user interface has been thrown together by a bunch of people who (a) don’t like each other and don’t talk to each other and (b) have never actually created (or used) a user interface before in their lives. It's the little things that tell you the designers simply don’t have a clue. Let's assume that you are using the TV guide, for example, and you click the 'Up' button repeatedly (often in frustration at the slow response). Now let's assume that you see a channel of interest scrolling by and you press the "Down" button... what do you expect would happen at this juncture?

I think any reasonable person would expect the control algorithm to say "Ah, the user has reversed direction, so let's immediately stop going 'Up'." (Actually, if you were scrolling quickly, it might be nice to automatically go one or two channels back 'Down', but let's not get carried away.) What actually happens is that the controller has stored all of your 'Up' clicks on a stack somewhere and it doggedly keeps on going 'Up' until they run out, at which point it starts executing your 'Down' clicks. Hopefully you didn’t click the 'Down' button too many times, or you will sit there with a little tear rolling down your cheek as the channel of interest scrolls by in the other direction. Give me strength!

I'm sorry. I see that I've started to rant and rave. It's been a long day. The point is that I just received a really chatty and friendly letter from the folks at a company called WOW! (www.wowway.com) who – I am informed – are now my "New Internet, Cable, and Phone provider, formally known as Knology."

I won’t go into the nitty-gritty details here, but the overall impression given by this letter is that they are jolly nice people whose main source of satisfaction is going to be to make me happy. Well, I certainly can't argue with that as a philosophy. Generally speaking, I think the world would be a much better place if more people made my happiness their goal in life.

The letter was signed:

Colleen Abdoulah
Hugger, Mother, Keeper of the Culture
CEO and Chairwoman of the Board
WOW! Internet, Cable and Phone

I know it's silly, but how can you not trust a CEO who bills herself as "Hugger, Mother, Keeper of the Culture." Quite apart from anything else, this letter was presented in such a happy and flamboyant style (unlike the dross one usually receives from big companies) that I find myself all enthused with great hopes for the future. So, am I easily pleased, or easily fooled?
 

If you found this article to be of interest, visit Programmable Logic Designline where – in addition to my Max's Cool Beans blogs – you will find the latest and greatest design, technology, product, and news articles with regard to programmable logic devices of every flavor and size (FPGAs, CPLDs, CSSPs, PSoCs...).

Also, you can obtain a highlights update delivered directly to your inbox by signing up for my weekly newsletter – just Click Here to request this newsletter using the Manage Newsletters tab (if you aren't already a member you'll be asked to register, but it's free and painless so don't let that stop you [grin]).




Max the Magnificent

3/12/2013 3:56 PM EDT

What the folks at WOW! Should do is immediately engage my services (as an extremely – nay, obscenely – well-paid consultant) to give them ideas on improving their user interface.

Sign in to Reply



Max the Magnificent

3/12/2013 3:57 PM EDT

As one other point for the folks at WOW! to consider ... on the basis that they are an Internet provider, it might be a good idea to speed their own http://www.wowway.com website up -- at the moment it's CRAWLING along...

Sign in to Reply



Rcurl

3/12/2013 5:26 PM EDT

I still use Dish network for our TV feed. It has the same problem as DirecTV as far as going out when there's a strong thunderstorm, but that's rare and we're generally pretty happy with it. We live WAY out in the boonies, so until recently our only option for Internet connectivity was via satellite. On a good day I could get about 300K of throughput. If I called tech support and complained the throughput would magically increase to about 700K for a day or so, and then go back to 300K. A couple of years ago AT&T rolled out "pair bonding" which allows their U-verse service to reach areas that were previously inaccessible due to the distance from the VRAD (video ready access device). It took four technicians and six trips to the house to get it working initially, but it has been WONDERFUL!! I've got a rock solid 11 Meg of throughput which is more than enough for streaming video, and the house phones are on it too.
You might check with AT&T to see if it is available in your neighborhood.

I don't think AT&T has a Hugger, Mother, Keeper of the Culture, though......sigh.......

Sign in to Reply



betajet

3/12/2013 5:28 PM EDT

I've found that USA broadcast digital TV easily meets all my TV needs, as well as those of my parents. I rarely use the "TV" as anything other than a monitor for watching DVDs.

For movie research, I recommend IMDB.com (the Internet Movie Data Base).

Sign in to Reply



Brian @ BDH

3/13/2013 12:39 AM EDT

It looks like Wow purchased Knology for $750M. I doubt anything will change. My guess is that the same equipment (and UI) will be used for your service.

The only way for them to change [reads: improve by listening to their customers] would be for many people to leave and provide the same rationale for leaving. And, most people would not pay more for the better UI and would live with the lower quality for the cost-savings they're realizing. I am convinced that cable companies do not care what their customers think.

You could try calling or writing and providing this information and/or this article URL and see what they say. Let us know!

Sign in to Reply



David Ashton

3/13/2013 1:59 AM EDT

@Max: "the only TV service we could receive was via satellite from DIRECTV"

You said in an earlier blog that all your terrestrial TV was digital....I presume then that this does not count? Where I am in regional Australia we have around 20 channels on free digital, yes there are times when we can't find anything but they are few. I would not splash out on Pay TV, though some do - usually the sports-mad or those with kids (for NatGeo, History, etc).

I would like to have the ability to do digital recordings, because one of the problems with the free-to-air is that all the really good programmes (Air Crash Investigations etc) are late, and being able to time shift them would fill in some of the gaps. I can't afford a PVR but I did buy recently a cheap set-top box (digital receiver) that can record to USB, gotta get that set up.

So - my questions - do you get the free digital signals where you are, and are they that bad that you need to get something better (even if more expensive)??

Sign in to Reply



Max the Magnificent

3/13/2013 11:33 AM EDT

Hi David -- the simple answer is that I don't know -- I just use the cable service, so I don't know what's available for free...

Sign in to Reply



Wnderer

3/13/2013 2:10 PM EDT

Go to
http://www.tvguide.com/Listings/

put in your zip code and compare what you get with cable, satellite and antenna and see if what you are paying is worth it to you.

Sign in to Reply



IDontUseTheForumSoWhyAmIForcedToMakeANickname

3/15/2013 11:11 AM EDT

Pssst, Max ... I'll give you a hint. It's called an antenna.

I know the cable and satellite providers have conspired to make sure you're unaware of this free option, but it should get you 5 or more channels depending on your area.

Sign in to Reply



antedeluvian

3/13/2013 1:54 PM EDT

Hi David

"do you get the free digital signals where you are, and are they that bad that you need to get something better"

In Toronto there are I believe 10-12 digital channels depending on how your antenna is set up. The problem is that these are the main broadcasters and is the same as on cable, but without any of the specialty channels which are only broadcast on "cable".

I don't know about the content in Australia, but the Canadian/US channels leave a lot to be desired and the commercials can drive you insane. I have opted to stay with good old analog cable and supplement with Netflix to provide my entertainment with a little Apple TV for more recent content.

Sign in to Reply



David Ashton

3/13/2013 5:29 PM EDT

Hmmmm.... Australia seems to be doing pretty well then. Our commercials are terrible too on some channels, but some of the government channels (about 4) don't have much AND have some quite good programmes.

We only have cable in the big cities, but you can get pay services on Satellite anywhere. minimum is about $ 40-50 per month.

Sign in to Reply



DarkMatter

3/14/2013 1:34 PM EDT

"losing reception in the middle of a storm..." It's called a rain fade - a matter of the physics of RF propagation. Not much of a problem with the old (and large) C-Band systems. More of a problem with Ku-Band systems and even more with the latest Ka-Band systems. A strong rain storm can easily cause a 15dB or more loss in receive signal strength at Ka-Band. Even terrestrial cable providers can suffer from it because their head-ends are often supplied with programming via satellite.

Sign in to Reply



David Ashton

3/14/2013 4:38 PM EDT

This is apparently due to the size of a falling raindrop (which is oval in shape) being around the size of a Ku half wave antenna. The old C-band transmissions were not as subject to it, but you did need much larger dishes.

Sign in to Reply



nannasin28

3/19/2013 3:23 AM EDT

we decided to switch back. http://www.hqew.net

Sign in to Reply



OmegaMan

3/19/2013 9:47 AM EDT

Sadly, the EETimes blogs have become a haven for spammers. You should prevent anyone from posting links, this may be the only way to "can the spam."

Sign in to Reply



Max the Magnificent

3/28/2013 5:11 PM EDT

I could delete their comment, but then your response wouldn't make any sense :-)

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)