Weird and Wacky Engineering
Comment
sharps_eng
You may scoff but we really have no idea how a 'swarm' of nerve cells ...
KB3001
Researchers have been thinking about such biological computers for some time ...
Crab computing: building a biological machine
Sylvie Barak
4/19/2012 4:42 PM EDT
The buzz around cloud computing is oh so 2011! That’s because the latest and greatest in terms of computational advancements (or should we say "sidesteps") is a sort of biological concept "computer" based on swarms of soldier crabs.
Japanese researchers from Kobe University came up with the creepy, crawly concept after reading research from the 1980s which posited that one could theoretically build a computer using the movement of billiard balls—with a bit of Newtonian physics and an idealized, friction-free environment thrown in.
That research, by Edward Fredkin and Tommaso Toffoli, used the billiard balls’ motion as a substitute for electronic signals, with researchers looking at how the balls collided into one another or emerged from a series of gates in a predictable direction and at a certain speed.
In layman’s terms, the researchers were trying to show the behavior one would expect from a logical gate (AND, OR, NOT), by using physical principles.
In an electronic circuit, the logic is "enforced" by using electricity, i.e.—either there is an electric current or there isn't at one of the inputs of the logical gate.
The researchers wanted to see whether they could use simple physical processes (the bouncing around of billiard balls in some environment) as a way of applying the same logical gates in an electronic circuit.
The problem they discovered, however, is that this is energy inefficient, because of all the power lost making the gates work.
As a result, Fredkin and Toffoli used simple physical processes (the bouncing around of billiard balls in some environment) as a way of applying the same logical gates in an electronic circuit.

If one were to imagine a pool table, with all sorts of small walls arranged on it, sort of like a maze, with many entrances and exits, that arrangement would represent the "hardware" of the computer. The logical gates.
The "software" is represented by the billiard balls, placed at some of the entrances, and then rolled into the maze with some velocity.
The combination of which entrances the billiard balls are put into, and the arrangement of the walls on the table determines which ball rolls out at which exit from the maze.
And presto: you have the makings of a computer.
What’s extra cool about the whole thing is that it’s also reversible, so if one were to roll the balls that came out of the maze back into the exits they came out from at the same speed they exited, the exact same inputs would be achieved.
There is very little energy lost in such an idealized process, which is a big deal, if one were to consider all the coal operated power plants it takes for Amazon, Facebook, Google and the likes to maintain electricity to keep their datacenters going.
Next: Using the crab model
Japanese researchers from Kobe University came up with the creepy, crawly concept after reading research from the 1980s which posited that one could theoretically build a computer using the movement of billiard balls—with a bit of Newtonian physics and an idealized, friction-free environment thrown in.
That research, by Edward Fredkin and Tommaso Toffoli, used the billiard balls’ motion as a substitute for electronic signals, with researchers looking at how the balls collided into one another or emerged from a series of gates in a predictable direction and at a certain speed.
In layman’s terms, the researchers were trying to show the behavior one would expect from a logical gate (AND, OR, NOT), by using physical principles.
In an electronic circuit, the logic is "enforced" by using electricity, i.e.—either there is an electric current or there isn't at one of the inputs of the logical gate.
The researchers wanted to see whether they could use simple physical processes (the bouncing around of billiard balls in some environment) as a way of applying the same logical gates in an electronic circuit.
The problem they discovered, however, is that this is energy inefficient, because of all the power lost making the gates work.
As a result, Fredkin and Toffoli used simple physical processes (the bouncing around of billiard balls in some environment) as a way of applying the same logical gates in an electronic circuit.

If one were to imagine a pool table, with all sorts of small walls arranged on it, sort of like a maze, with many entrances and exits, that arrangement would represent the "hardware" of the computer. The logical gates.
The "software" is represented by the billiard balls, placed at some of the entrances, and then rolled into the maze with some velocity.
The combination of which entrances the billiard balls are put into, and the arrangement of the walls on the table determines which ball rolls out at which exit from the maze.
And presto: you have the makings of a computer.
What’s extra cool about the whole thing is that it’s also reversible, so if one were to roll the balls that came out of the maze back into the exits they came out from at the same speed they exited, the exact same inputs would be achieved.
There is very little energy lost in such an idealized process, which is a big deal, if one were to consider all the coal operated power plants it takes for Amazon, Facebook, Google and the likes to maintain electricity to keep their datacenters going.
Next: Using the crab model
Navigate to related information


iniewski
4/19/2012 6:17 PM EDT
Pretty cool Sylvie...can't wait to get one of those bilogical computers...ideally if it could eat my food waste to generate energy for its own operation that would be fantastic ;-)...Kris
Sign in to Reply
dylan.mcgrath
4/20/2012 1:40 AM EDT
This is seriously mind boggling. I want to know how they got into a room together and decided that their next project should be building a computer based on soldier crabs. seriously? Have all of the other mysteries of science been solved?
Sign in to Reply
prabhakar_deosthali
4/20/2012 7:18 AM EDT
This could be a great new idea but will it be possible to have it in a miniaturized form as small as today's electronic circuits?
Sign in to Reply
KB3001
4/20/2012 10:30 AM EDT
Researchers have been thinking about such biological computers for some time now. Except for niche applications, such computers have serious issues to do with dependability, generalisability, and scalability.
Sign in to Reply
sharps_eng
4/23/2012 2:24 PM EDT
You may scoff but we really have no idea how a 'swarm' of nerve cells communicating in a brain adds up to intelligence, and there is precedent to say that examining macro behaviour can throw light on the micro-opeations within.
So blue sky research into crab swarms, even as seen through a journalist's funfair-distorting lens, is as good a way as any to gather insights into life's mysteries. What's important is good observation, good recording, and good peer publication.
So, examining the behaviour of journalists and their subjects tells us what, exactly?
Sign in to Reply