Weird and Wacky Engineering
The EC’s new marketing tactic? Sexism
Sylvie Barak
6/27/2012 10:23 AM EDT
In what appears to be an institutional attempt to patronize and condescend to women everywhere, the European Commission’s marketing team has released a YouTube video of a group of giggly girls in lab coats, apparently manicuring their way to a science degree.
No, seriously, this is the European Commission’s attempt at attracting more women into scientific fields, take a look:
Yes…. “Science…it’s a girl thing!”
Please excuse me, I need to find a bucket.
“Good Lord. What is that, the "science" of makeup?” asked one female commenter after viewing the video, adding sarcastically, “I don't know about you, but I always wear my highest heels when working in the lab.” (Personally, I wouldn't be seen dead soldering circuits without a perfect manicure... it would just be a huge no-no...)
“They clearly meant well, but... yeah,” added a male technology journalist in response.
Now, I'm not saying the EC is inherently sexist. It’s not. It even has a female vice president (Neelie Kroes) responsible for the Digital Agenda for Europe.
What I am saying is that this marketing video certainly smacks of a lack of the role of women in today's workplace. And that's shocking, to say the least.
I’ve emailed the spokesperson at the EC and am currently waiting for a comment. I’ll update the story if I get one.
No, seriously, this is the European Commission’s attempt at attracting more women into scientific fields, take a look:
Yes…. “Science…it’s a girl thing!”
Please excuse me, I need to find a bucket.
“Good Lord. What is that, the "science" of makeup?” asked one female commenter after viewing the video, adding sarcastically, “I don't know about you, but I always wear my highest heels when working in the lab.” (Personally, I wouldn't be seen dead soldering circuits without a perfect manicure... it would just be a huge no-no...)
“They clearly meant well, but... yeah,” added a male technology journalist in response.
Now, I'm not saying the EC is inherently sexist. It’s not. It even has a female vice president (Neelie Kroes) responsible for the Digital Agenda for Europe.
What I am saying is that this marketing video certainly smacks of a lack of the role of women in today's workplace. And that's shocking, to say the least.
I’ve emailed the spokesperson at the EC and am currently waiting for a comment. I’ll update the story if I get one.
Navigate to related information


Thomas "Rick" Tewell
6/27/2012 10:59 AM EDT
Well...at least the production value is good :)
From the thumbnail of the YouTube video...I thought this was from the 50's. You really want to meet the folks who do these things and look them in the eye and say "what exactly were you thinking?"
This reminds me of the Seinfeld episode when Jerry wanted to know what Elaine and her friend (a woman)did together one day:
Jerry: "What else did you two do?"
Elaine "Oh, you know, girly stuff."
Jerry: "So, uh, flower shows, shopping for pretty bows, then back to her place, strip down to bra and panties for a tickle fight."
Elaine: "That's really what you think girls do, isn't it?"
Jerry: "Yes, I do."
So...I doubt that any women were involved with the EC video. It was likely a few guys sitting around and one of them said..."HEY I've got an idea."
Sign in to Reply
chanj
6/27/2012 11:11 AM EDT
Like everything else, science shall never be connected to gender, imo. Although, in reality, there are more men than women in science and engineering, there have been outstanding women in these fields. As time goes, I am sure there will be more.
I don't understand what inspire EC to make the ad. Is there lack of women in science and engineering in European Countries? I think there has been lack of outstanding high school graduates choosing any subjects related to pure science and engineering. It may just be a cycle. Or it could be a more serious problem in the long run.
Sign in to Reply
ovrebekk
6/28/2012 6:43 PM EDT
It's a paradox, but in countries where gender equality is high men and women actually tend to choose traditional male/female jobs, simply because that's what most people tend to choose if they can choose freely. In my EE class at university in Norway 3 out of a 100 students were women :(
Sign in to Reply
EVVJSK
6/29/2012 3:33 PM EDT
A couple of thoughts:
I wonder if the "choice" is more about exposure (i.e. lack of mentoring and opportunity). I will say that my girlfriend and her daughter are often less worried about the "how" behind things than the "what" that it does for them. In many cases, I try to explain the "how". Sometimes they are interested and often times I get the "why are you telling me this" look. Hopefully more men and women mentoring younger girls (as well as boys) will make for better scientists and engineers that include both girls and boys!
Sign in to Reply
anne-francoise.pele
7/16/2012 11:25 AM EDT
Here is a link to a book that celebrates European women scientists throughout the ages. The book tells the stories of some of the heroines of European science. http://ec.europa.eu/research/audio/women-in-science/pdf/wis_en.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none.
Sign in to Reply
GoStripes
6/27/2012 11:34 AM EDT
Yeah, we all know that women who like tech are totally UGLY. Beautiful women should just piss off.
Sexism? That's the idiot who wrote this piece.
Sign in to Reply
elizabethsimon
6/27/2012 1:03 PM EDT
As a woman, I have no quarrel with showing beautiful women who like tech in an ad. The problem I have with this ad is that there is only one short scene that actually shows a woman DOING something technical.
There is an unfortunate stereotype (especially in the USA and Europe) that only unattractive people are interested in tech. Since most women want to be considered attractive this tends to discourage them from tech.
This ad may be an attempt to counter that but they should be able to do that without it coming across as sexist.
Sign in to Reply
KB3001
7/5/2012 4:49 PM EDT
It's a tacky add, yes.
Sign in to Reply
nicolas.mokhoff
6/27/2012 2:07 PM EDT
In lieu of equal time the male-dominated EC has a page profiling women in science, probably more appropriate to use in a marketing campaign to reach the young and get them interested in science, sans dancing music and high heels: http://science-girl-thing.eu/profiles-of-women-in-science#
But then who would pay attention in our visual impact world?
Sign in to Reply
Frank Eory
6/27/2012 7:44 PM EDT
Nothing wrong with using attractive models -- most ads do, whether the models are male or female.
But seriously, the clothes, the shoes, the dancing and strutting? This looked more like a recruitment ad for a cosmetics company -- and not necessarily for recruiting STEM employees.
Sign in to Reply
Bert22306
6/27/2012 9:25 PM EDT
We all know that the strutting around from that video is not what we typically see in engineering schools and workplaces. But hey, don't get so irate, Sylvie! I've seen more than a few EE Times videos with very attractive EE Times reporters on them! So what, that should stop too? Nooo!
Sign in to Reply
D2455
6/28/2012 2:28 AM EDT
Being beautiful disqualifies you for an Engineering position the same way as being knowledgeable hinders you on your way into higher management.
Sign in to Reply
KB3001
7/5/2012 4:51 PM EDT
Not sure that's true. I have studied with some very good looking female Engineering students :-)
Sign in to Reply
AmandaN
6/28/2012 11:26 AM EDT
I'm not sure what they're getting at with all the lipstick, blush, etc. throughout the video. It feels like they're saying 'Yea, you can be in a lab but you gotta be dressed unappropriately, preoccupied with cosmetics, don't touch anything and leave the real stuff to the men. Oh, and if you're good, we'll let you wear some of our eye protection!'
Sign in to Reply
DutchUncle
6/29/2012 2:44 PM EDT
A few jobs ago the mostly-male embedded programming group I worked in interviewed a candidate with suitable education and experience. A significant part of the discussion afterwards was whether our interviews had been consistent with other interviews because she was so attractive, and then whether we were unfairly being *negative* questioning our objectivity (and by extension the candidate) because she was so attractive.
Admittedly the case was a closer call than another candidate who was also attractive and also clearly super-competent (despite being a fresh-out masters). In that case the packaging was not an issue either way.
Sign in to Reply
RDentonSr
6/29/2012 3:57 PM EDT
I don't understand the issue.
What difference does it really make if few women choose to pursue science and engineering as a career?
Sign in to Reply
Sparky_Watt
7/2/2012 6:26 PM EDT
Your comment assumes that the best thing for society is that people get what they want and are popular. That assumption is untrue. What is best for society is that we all work together to solve our problems in as efficient a manner as possible. Anything else simply prolongs the suffering (and if you don't know what suffering is there, open your eyes and heart). To make things better at peak efficiency, we must make the best use of the resources we have. That means that a creative, intelligent woman who doesn't get into science and engineering is a loss to the whole world.
Sign in to Reply
Bert22306
7/2/2012 6:40 PM EDT
"Your comment assumes that the best thing for society is that people get what they want and are popular."
I disagree. To me, that comment meant that people can only excel at what they have a passion for. So that's what they should be doing.
There's more that society needs than just engineers. If someone wants to become an architect, or a college professor, or a doctor, or a linguist, or any number of other professions, it's not because they want to do what is most "popular."
At the same time, it would be foolish to force them into engineering, because they would make, at best, mediocre engineers.
Sign in to Reply
Bert22306
6/29/2012 4:19 PM EDT
"I will say that my girlfriend and her daughter are often less worried about the 'how' behind things than the 'what' that it does for them. In many cases, I try to explain the 'how'. Sometimes they are interested and often times I get the 'why are you telling me this'"
That's hilarious, and it's also been my experience. In fact, sometimes when we're with company, and someone asks some detailed technical question, my wife responds (correctly). And then she follows that up with, "And the really scary part is that I knew that."
I don't obsess as to why women are not so into STEM. I had zero women in my EE classes in undergrad and grad school. And in all my years at work, worked with at most 4 women total. All software types.
My daughter aced all of her STEM courses, including a Junior level Pascal course she took when she was a high school Freshman, and she went into vet medicine. So that's sort of straddling the fence, but it's not engineering. So, she certainly wasn't intimidated by STEM courses, but she was more interested in how nature engineers things than in engineering these things herself.
Sign in to Reply
Frank Eory
6/29/2012 6:14 PM EDT
When I was an EE undergrad, there were two women who took many of the same courses I did and who graduated the same semester I did.
They were always the only women in those EE courses, and they were also the two smartest students, the ones who always got the highest grades on every exam.
Not all women are into STEM, just as not all men are into STEM. But I have worked with some very talented female design engineers, and I have often wondered about the careers of those two brilliant women from college. I have no doubt they were very successful at whichever paths they chose in our industry.
Sign in to Reply
wilber_xbox
6/30/2012 2:36 AM EDT
Science is a broad term that also includes Medicine, Biology, Chemistry and in these specific fields women have more representation than men. Though the video is a welcome step to motivate women take up Engineering fields but EC should motivate both genders in general.
Sign in to Reply
seaEE
6/30/2012 12:26 PM EDT
It is possible that video may motivate a few guys to take up engineering fields too. ;)
Sign in to Reply
jane xu
6/30/2012 4:18 AM EDT
We might have to forgive EC for doing such a cheap thing, when considering austerity and restriction needed in Europe.
But yes, they can do better in brushing up old 50s video clips and wrapping them up into new ideas that effectively motivate younger generations, male and female, to take part in science.
Sign in to Reply
Thomas "Rick" Tewell
6/30/2012 1:44 PM EDT
Just watched it again with the sound off. Its a goofy video - no way around it. No way this video works as intended unless I completely misunderstand Europeans.
Sign in to Reply
Monkey_noise
7/2/2012 5:03 AM EDT
I'm from England and female. We're technically part of Europe but don't like to label ourselves as part of Europe. Anyway, to me, it looked like a cosmetic ad or fashion ad. That ad would never have got me to choose engineering as a career. The only reason I became interested was because one gentleman came to my school and discussed 5 apprenticeships with different companies. I sent a CV to all 5 and was invited to an interview by 3. Long story short, at the age of 15 (pending GCSE results) I had signed on to an appenticeship all because 1 guy informed me about apprenticeships.
Sign in to Reply
KB3001
7/5/2012 4:54 PM EDT
It's also about role models. We need to get successful female Engineers to go to Schools and talk to young girls about Engineering careers.
Sign in to Reply
antiquus
7/2/2012 11:36 AM EDT
You're all thinking like grown, self-assured adults. Now imagine yourself as a 10yr old girl looking beyond the box full of Barbies. Is it worth doing your maths homework, or building up a science fair poster? Having one brain cell that links glamour with science is probably not a bad thing.
Sign in to Reply
http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/poconoarmchairreview
7/5/2012 9:31 PM EDT
I've activated the roof-top light to summon the members of the all-female Engineering Squad. They should be here any minute to answer your questions about their interest in designing things.
Sign in to Reply
Bytebarker
7/7/2012 2:05 PM EDT
I believe that most of the commenters here, as myself, are technologists of one form or another, and are therefore not part of the target audience for this piece. I give the EC credit for at least recognizing that one of the key issues with encouraging youth, especially females, in STEM is the negative social stigma attached to it. The subject is so geeky, nerdy, and uncool that few youth will risk the ridicule of their peers, and peer pressure is huge. I think the message they tried to convey is that you don't need to leave fashion and your social life behind to pursue STEM. As such, I don't see it as being sexist.
There was a short piece that ran on U.S. TV perhaps 20 years ago. It featured a black teen working equations, as several famous athletes cheered him on and congratulated him on his success. I remember that Faud Reveiz, the former Miami Dolphins kicker, was among them. A similar message aimed at a different audience.
Sign in to Reply
WKetel
7/7/2012 8:42 PM EDT
My guess is that is how some of those quite wealthy EU executives think. Being rich and powerful does not assure a good character by any means. ON the other hand, it is probably quite a challenge to interest anybody in engineering unless they already have some technical interest. I am not sure how that would be done. But then, I am an engineer, not a motivational wizard.
Sign in to Reply
Bert22306
7/8/2012 5:51 PM EDT
"The subject is so geeky, nerdy, and uncool that few youth will risk the ridicule of their peers ..."
Whoa, what an odd attitude! What SHOULD be strange is to venerate those who have a talent for throwing spheres or oblong spheroids around, for no good reason. Even if this earns them obscene incomes.
Sign in to Reply