Engineering Pop Culture!
Comment
Bob Lacovara
I knew, I knew that my sardonic notion wasn't unique... I just couldn't remember ...
mosspp
I'd love to try your experiment Bob. I believe that we would see an immediate ...
Engineering and the American Dream
Dylan McGrath
11/29/2011 1:29 PM EST
A couple of weeks ago, Yahoo Finance circulated some disturbing results from a survey it conducted of 1,500 Americans between the ages of 18 and 64. While a majority of those surveyed—53 percent—said they still viewed America as the land of opportunity, a full 41 percent said they felt the American Dream was out of reach.
The American Dream—that idea that through hard work and innovation anyone can prosper in the U.S.—is a critical component of our national fabric. But the concept appears to be under threat on multiple fronts.
Results of a similar survey conducted by New York Life Insurance Co., released in May, reflect similar pessimism. That survey of 1,001 U.S. adults found that only 41 percent of responding parents believe their children will have a higher standard of living than their parents.
I have a hunch that these results are partially skewed by the undercurrent of negativity running through current events. Indeed, the Yahoo Finance survey found that 63 percent of respondents believe the economy is getting worse (including 72 percent of respondents over 55).

Occupy Wall Street protestors march in New York's Zuccotti Park.
Source: David Shankbone, Wikimedia Commons.
The U.S. economy has been sluggish at best for going on four years now, and unemployment remains stubbornly high. As a nation we have been running huge budget deficits, adding to a an already staggering national debt, and we keep hearing that there is going to be a reckoning. To make matters worse, rather than working together to address the issues, our national elected officials have completely failed to provide leadership, choosing instead to use their positions to advance their political ideologies and prepare for the next election. The Yahoo Finance survey found that only about one-quarter of the public is confident that President Obama and Congress can fix the financial crisis.
Not exactly a rosy picture, is it? Indeed, we have been hearing for years that the economic situation in the U.S. is as bad or worse than it has been since the Great Depression. Against this backdrop, it's a wonder that the Yahoo Finance survey did not reflect even greater pessimism about the state of the American Dream.
But the U.S. has basically been hit by recessions of varying degrees near the beginning of every decade since the 1860s. While the Great Recession that began in 2008 was admittedly more severe than most (hence the name), I have a hunch that if the Yahoo Finance survey were conducted during any of these periods it would find similar levels of pessimism. Were the Yahoo Finance surveyors to go back in time and conduct the survey in, for example, early 1982, with unemployment in the neighborhood of 10 percent, my guess is it would find just as much despair about the state of the American Dream as exists today.
Flash forward to late to 2000, just before the dot com bubble deflated in earnest, when President Clinton told Congress and the American people that the state of the union was "the strongest it has ever been," and I'd venture to say you'd find a lot more people feeling pretty upbeat about the American Dream.
Next: Occupy this
The American Dream—that idea that through hard work and innovation anyone can prosper in the U.S.—is a critical component of our national fabric. But the concept appears to be under threat on multiple fronts.
Results of a similar survey conducted by New York Life Insurance Co., released in May, reflect similar pessimism. That survey of 1,001 U.S. adults found that only 41 percent of responding parents believe their children will have a higher standard of living than their parents.
I have a hunch that these results are partially skewed by the undercurrent of negativity running through current events. Indeed, the Yahoo Finance survey found that 63 percent of respondents believe the economy is getting worse (including 72 percent of respondents over 55).
Occupy Wall Street protestors march in New York's Zuccotti Park.
Source: David Shankbone, Wikimedia Commons.
The U.S. economy has been sluggish at best for going on four years now, and unemployment remains stubbornly high. As a nation we have been running huge budget deficits, adding to a an already staggering national debt, and we keep hearing that there is going to be a reckoning. To make matters worse, rather than working together to address the issues, our national elected officials have completely failed to provide leadership, choosing instead to use their positions to advance their political ideologies and prepare for the next election. The Yahoo Finance survey found that only about one-quarter of the public is confident that President Obama and Congress can fix the financial crisis.
Not exactly a rosy picture, is it? Indeed, we have been hearing for years that the economic situation in the U.S. is as bad or worse than it has been since the Great Depression. Against this backdrop, it's a wonder that the Yahoo Finance survey did not reflect even greater pessimism about the state of the American Dream.
But the U.S. has basically been hit by recessions of varying degrees near the beginning of every decade since the 1860s. While the Great Recession that began in 2008 was admittedly more severe than most (hence the name), I have a hunch that if the Yahoo Finance survey were conducted during any of these periods it would find similar levels of pessimism. Were the Yahoo Finance surveyors to go back in time and conduct the survey in, for example, early 1982, with unemployment in the neighborhood of 10 percent, my guess is it would find just as much despair about the state of the American Dream as exists today.
Flash forward to late to 2000, just before the dot com bubble deflated in earnest, when President Clinton told Congress and the American people that the state of the union was "the strongest it has ever been," and I'd venture to say you'd find a lot more people feeling pretty upbeat about the American Dream.
Next: Occupy this
Navigate to related information



Duane Benson
11/29/2011 2:23 PM EST
You're right with this Dylan. It really has to be put into context. We Americans tend to have very short-term memory.
One of the big differences between 1982 and now is that back then, mortgage rates were exceeding 15%. Say goodby to purchasing a home at those rates. We also still had a fairly hot cold war going on with the Soviets with well in excess of 50,000 nuclear warheads; maybe ten thousand of which were always 30 minutes from someplace to blow up. Our auto industry was in shambles. That may be also true now, but 1982 was still a time when the phrase "What's good for GM is good for the country" was thought to be true.
Everyone was depressed and saying that for the first time the new generation would be poorer than the prior one. The American economy was supposed to be dead. Many of us thought that rather than fighting for jobs, we'd be fighting for scraps of food in a radioactive wasteland.
Certainly our economy is messed up, our employment horizon looks very bleak and the world seems to be pretty deep into heck in hand basket. Still, I'd take this decade over the 80's any time.
Sign in to Reply
C VanDorne
11/29/2011 4:42 PM EST
You describe the early Eighties like I remember the late Seventies. Either way that awesome decade was mamorable not for its early years, but for its recovery and the renewal of Americas greatness. And we got out of that mess by following a president who beleived deeply in the American Dream and American Exceptionalism. After three years of waiting for Hope and Change it is obvious that we don't have that now. And until we have a president who respects the American Dream for all, not just those on his friends list: government workers, union bosses, crony capitalist of the "green" agenda, achademia, anyone who depends on the above, occupy types, welfare recipients etc. the American Dream is on hold, sadly.
Sign in to Reply
Duane Benson
11/29/2011 5:26 PM EST
The late seventies and early eighties kind of run together. It takes more than two years even for a visionary to turn things around and I think economically, '82 might have been the peak. It was uphill in the right direction for a long time after that. But to your point I think we did start to see the light at the end of the tunnel as far back as the election in November 1980.
Sign in to Reply
Simon7382
11/29/2011 11:48 PM EST
Really?? You honestly believe that the American Dream has been slipping away because of Obama? I always thought that our government could use more engineers (vs. lawyers) because we are analytical, hard working and data driven independent thinkers and problem solvers. Your post above made me doubt the correctness of my beliefs regarding our engineering community.
Sign in to Reply
C VanDorne
11/30/2011 9:17 AM EST
Your assesment of the engineering mind is accurate. So apply those analytical skills to the current administration and ask yourself if he is nurturing the American Dream or targeting it. Based on the evidence I see, it is the latter. And although you are correct that the execution of the American Dream is ultimatley in our hands government is, unfortortunately, much more powerful now than it ever has been, thus my concern.
Sign in to Reply
Duane Benson
11/30/2011 10:57 AM EST
Our economic issues have very little to do with Obama. There certainly are some obstructionist politicians in Washington these days, but that's nothing new. Regardless of whether you think he's doing a good job or not, our current problems started long before he got here. And, no. That doesn't mean Bush either. A whole lot of people in the US and abroad have contributed to where we are. Obama just happens to have landed in the most difficult job given to a president since Reagan.
I'd turn grey too. Maybe even pick up smoking.
Sign in to Reply
C VanDorne
12/1/2011 11:19 AM EST
So take the high road and highlight the need to understand that there is a broad range of problems. Fine. This forum is appropiate for that. Some problems ARE long-running: central banks, fiat currency, moral relativism, ignorance of Free-Markets, besieged federalism, unchecked "progressivism", etc.. But why be so quick to give a pass to the president of these 57 United States? Do you not recall the expectations that got him where he is? If he is not moving us in a direction toward solving those problems then he becomes the problem, even if they preceded him.
Solving that part of the complex solution is easy. It starts next November.
Sign in to Reply
Big Paul
12/7/2011 9:01 PM EST
I would not worry about C VanDome. He is raging against a fantasy where President Obama is singularly responsible for all the worlds ills. These days there seems to be a poster like that in every forum.
Considering the US was losing 800K jobs per month and the financial system was near total collapse when Republicans handed over the White House, and now we have stabilized and are adding jobs, it takes willful blindness to claim Obama wants to destroy the "American Dream".
Sign in to Reply
C VanDorne
12/8/2011 1:36 PM EST
Nothing to see here folks…move along…move along. Incredulity swells as history is re-written. Would you have us believe that we lost jobs at an 800K/month clip for the entire eight years of Bush, the last two of which were shared by a Democrat controlled congress BTW? Is that decade such ancient history that we've forget that the numbers were enviously good for seven of those eight years? Including the early ones, when together we worked our way out of the tech-bubble recession and watched two icons of American greatness blown up. No, the wheels fell off at the tail end after the housing bubble burst. And if you call what we have now "stable" - 16% unemployment (U6 number, the 9% U3 number being reported is "kludged" to use our language) and generations of debt - then you'll certainly never be accused of being perceptive. But put the numbers aside, have you stopped to ask yourself why this discussion persists? Would we be carrying on about the lack of opportunity and the poor outlook of the American Dream if things were good? Hey, if you feel "stable" then God bless you but I bet most don't share that view.
As for my earlier posts I just wanted to posit that Duane was TOO quick to dismiss Obama as being PART of the problem; that he absolutely IS and that we can do something about it by having the courage to dispatch him next November, all fast and furious like.
But why take my word for it fellow wingnuts and wingnut-haters alike? Just read his words from his speech in Kansas a few days ago. He made clear what HE thinks of America Dream: that it has never worked; and then he vocalized his socialist designs on this country with class envy language that would make Kim Jong blush. So, by virtue of his own re-election campaign we are now no longer faced with asking ourselves what happened to the American Dream or to what degree Obama is the problem. We will now be forced to ask ourselves: Is socialism a problem? And do we want it?
Sign in to Reply
Bert22306
12/8/2011 4:45 PM EST
There's plenty of blame to be spread around.
Don't forget what precipitated the crisis, and when it happened. What got the avalanche started was defaults on home loans, ca. 2008, following a totally insane housing bubble. Meaning, the problems started at the very end of the last administration, and they were precipitated by overly generous home loans, approved by overly aggressive loaning institutions, which was made possible by politicaslly-motivated government guarantees for questionable home loans. It didn't take many of these ridiculous loans to bring down the house of cards. A minority of loans, something like 16 percent, but enough to create a landslide, given how tightly that industry is leveraged.
Is the last administration to be blamed for pushing for these government guarantees? I doubt it!
And yes, greedy bankers who lied about the viability of their subprime mortgages.
This is how the problem started. Now that the housing market has returned to a somewhat more credible footing, it is taking a long time to recover. Because a lot of (supposed) wealth was tied up in real estate.
But unfortunately, we are made to believe that it will take a "leader" from the government to single handedly pilot the economy back to health, even though it was government policies that created the mess to begin with.
Sign in to Reply
askubel
11/29/2011 3:00 PM EST
Those who complain about having "lower living standard" than their parents are forgetting the technological advances that have been made since their parents time. Computing and communication improvements are obvious, but even things like cars have improved immensely. In 1990, you could get a brand new Honda Civic for $8000 USD. In 2011 dollars, that's about $14000, roughly the same price as a new Hyundai Accent. But if you compare the comfort, safety, performance of the 2011 Accent to that 1990 Civic, you'd think the people of 20 years ago were getting ripped off.
These advancements are only possible because engineers, so it disturbs me to hear that some people would turn their children away from careers in engineering. As the world continues to develop, and more people compete for fixed resources, economic growth is going to depend further on technology. We can't keep building factories, but we can keep making faster computers and better software.
Right now the top hardware and software companies are based in the US, but we need to continue to promote science and engineering, or the center of the technological world will shift elsewhere.
Sign in to Reply
Wnderer
11/29/2011 3:18 PM EST
The 80s were great for engineering. It was the barnstorming age of engineering. There was a whole new world of PCs, software and electronics and lots of venture capital to finance it. There were lots of old fashioned devices that could be improved by adding a microprocessor and some simple code. Now PCs and the internet are all old news. The industry is controlled by big corporate players eking profits out of incremental improvements. The revolution is over.
Sign in to Reply
Code Monkey
11/29/2011 4:22 PM EST
The revolution is only just beginning.
Sign in to Reply
Simon7382
11/29/2011 11:52 PM EST
I disagree: the engineering world is full of "revolutions". After the PC revolution came the Internet revolution, and after the internet revolution maybe the green energy revolution, or something else. It is up to us to create our next revolution.
Sign in to Reply
Duane Benson
11/29/2011 3:35 PM EST
When the PC revolution mellowed, along came the Internet revolution. Now we have robotics about to catch fire. It's different now. It's never been easy. It's not easy now. But it's not over. Not by a long shot.
Sign in to Reply
kevin.parmenter
11/29/2011 4:18 PM EST
read this article. after the dotcom era went bust, the finance and operations people promoted themselves in charge and metrics for everything took over. In addition to using microsoft office suite for anything and everything and reducing the entire operation to fixed formula. The result? customers and the basics were lost. how come the USA was an economic powerhouse before financial metrics and microsoft office suite? read this article
http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2011/11/18/clayton-christensen-how-pursuit-of-profits-kills-innovation-and-the-us-economy/
Sign in to Reply
William.Hood
12/2/2011 2:48 PM EST
Thanks Kevin. Excellent article!
Sign in to Reply
EREBUS
11/29/2011 4:24 PM EST
The American Dream is still alive. People just have to remember that you have to "WORK" for it. I think too many people expect to just walk in and be a millionaire. It never worked that way. You have to have the inspiration and then do the persperation part to get your rewards. Yes, it is not easy. It never was. It never will be. Only you can determine your success. Waiting for it to happen will not work. Working to make it happen gives you your only chance.
Sign in to Reply
Simon7382
11/29/2011 11:55 PM EST
Agreed. Except the playing field is more slanted against the doers then it used to be 20-30 years ago.
Sign in to Reply
Duane Benson
11/29/2011 5:35 PM EST
The first dot-com boom convinced a lot of the countries brightest young minds that all you needed was a dorm room, an idea and six months. Then you'd go IPO, cash out your millions and live the life of leisure from then on. A lot of people decided that sustained hard work and producing real value were just for the old fogies, that we were dinosaurs and just didn't get the "New economy."
There was never a new economy. It's all the same. You have to work hard. You have to be creative. You have to stick to it and not let the dips get you down. The obstacles change all the time but they've always been there to one degree or another.
Sign in to Reply
Bert22306
11/29/2011 7:04 PM EST
I don't take such emotion-filled polls very seriously. Every time the economy is down, the masses become overly dramatic, with predictions that it will never get any better. The same thing happened during the "malaise" Carter years, for those old enough to remember. "Stagflation," so called, would be with us forever. Then in 1981, oil was deregulated. And then everything took off again, in spite of the previous "malaise" and dire predictions.
On the other side of that coin, during the .com bubble, people were being just as illogical, making ridiculous amounts of money on vapor, and thinking that's all it took. I guess they found out differently. So, like then, whatever is the situation today gets extrapolated to become the supposed permanent state of affairs.
What we need now is politicians who quit blaming the previous administration for this state of the economy, and look instead in the mirror. The jobs aren't coming back yet because government policies are holding businesses back. A government that thinks it's more capable than individuals and businesses, to create economic growth. A government that believes a strong economy can be achieved with mere consumer spending, and government spending on the maintenance of infrastructure. These are absurd notions. Just as absurd as the get rich schemes of the vapor-filled .com bubble days.
Not to mention, have you noticed how many politicians these days talk about "the middle class" when they really mean "the working poor?" Government policies that are primarily aimed at increasing the spending ability of "the working poor," important as that might be, are hardly the policies that will spur economic growth.
So, as far as I'm concerned, this downturn will certainly end. This is still the land of opportunity. But we need to fire the politicians who think that THEY embody that opportunity, or that THEY are the ones who can lead people to it. These are ideas best left the dictatorships of the "less fortunate" countries.
Sign in to Reply
Rich Krajewski
11/29/2011 10:08 PM EST
"There are undoubtedly many engineers who are quite happy and prosperous and feel excited about the future prospects for engineering in America."
It's a golden age of prosperity, for sure, comrade.
Sign in to Reply
dylan.mcgrath
11/29/2011 11:12 PM EST
Hi Rich- I'm not sure I understand the point that you are trying to make.
Sign in to Reply
Simon7382
11/29/2011 11:56 PM EST
"Comrade"?? WTF are you smoking?
Sign in to Reply
Frank Eory
11/30/2011 1:51 AM EST
Count me among the old fogies who still believes in the American Dream for my kids, who still loves doing electronics design work every day, and who feels fortunate to have had -- and continue to have -- opportunities to do exciting work, make some nice profits for my company, and make a decent salary.
As I have said here before, I have one child studying engineering right now, and as it turns out, another who is now giving it serious consideration. Do they worry about the economy and their career prospects as soon to be young engineering grads in the U.S.? Of course they do. Don't we all do that when the economy is down and companies are tightening their belts? But do we give up on our dreams? Is that the message we give to our children? Not in my house we don't!
Meanwhile, this past Black Friday was the biggest in history. Not bad for the "worst economy since the Great Depression." And for those who are caught up in the media-fueled malaise, for those who think there are no more big opportunities for growth, history is a great reminder. Even in this past decade, which started with a recession, the dot-com bubble bursting, and the worst attack on our country since WW2, there were huge opportunities, especially in electronics and internet-related fields. Even a bright young kid could start a company, drop out of college, start a company and find himself living the life of a multi-billionaire, while still in his 20s.
Opportunity and the American Dream is a state of mind. Those who see the glass as half empty will muddle along, slowly emptying that glass until it is dry. Those who see it as half full will find a way to fill it up, and then another glass, and yet another.
Sign in to Reply
dylan.mcgrath
11/30/2011 2:29 AM EST
Frank- Well said, as always. Thank you for weighing in. I think that there are actually a lot more "glass half full" types out there than it sometimes appears.
I admire your perspective. Clearly you are doing work that still entralls you. The value of that cannot be measured. I think that's one thing that people sometimes lose sight of. Engineering, like any worthwhile profession, is as much a calling as it is a career.
Sign in to Reply
Bert22306
11/30/2011 3:21 PM EST
Good post, Frank. Very well said.
Sign in to Reply
antiquus
11/30/2011 6:42 PM EST
Although I do see the American Dream as possible, it depends on the bootstrap you can give your kids. @Frank can obviously do that.
I recently read an artical that suggests social engineering is a cause: the government pays people to go to college, ergo no one wants to be an hourly worker, ergo no factories want to be in the US.
Foreign economies are about to hit critical mass with their own engineering communities. Grandchildren of factory workers have achieved the resources to go to college, and will now compete against US engineers. Its not about money (although that is a factor), but it is about would-be engineers having an opportunity at this moment in time.
Sign in to Reply
stippu
12/1/2011 12:38 PM EST
I second with Dylan and Bert - Frank has indeed clicked the right button.
Let me give you an Indian perspective. We keep talking about innovation and great IT talent et al but at the end of it, do you see anything like an "Indian dream"" being voiced at all?
I am not demeaning my country - I love my country but there is reality to be faced too.
I am of the firm believer that it is all in the mind and if you really think you can do great things, I am sure you can. That’s the difference between America and other countries. Many Americans do have the guts and take the risk to do something different and take a path which is untrodden. Simply put, others don’t.
Recently, I met this American and he narrated this " strange" experience: It was a five star hotel he was staying in, it was the first time he was visiting India and this hotel was a pretty new one, slightly away from the main city, so probably the staff were given instructions to be extra concerned about foreign guests. So when this American friend of mine wanted to go outside the building and take a look around, he was followed by the hotel security staff - just to make sure he could cross the road. He was pretty pissed off about this and ticked them off -literally told them to keep away from him and let him do the things his own way. Am sure the security guard would have been petrified but that's not the point. The point I am trying to make is - Americans do have the ability to do original thinking, even if it meant crossing the road with cars honking away to glory, whereas Indians or Chinese or Malayasians tend to follow the beaten path.
So as long you are capable of thinking out of the box, then the American dream will never die.
The whole world believes in the American dream, I don’t hear of any Chinese or Japanese dream.. how can something like this just fade away?
Sign in to Reply
C VanDorne
12/1/2011 1:47 PM EST
Because of great reminders like this one, Stippu, it won't. Thank you.
Sign in to Reply
y_sasaki
12/4/2011 7:54 PM EST
Snippu,
It is interesting to hear what is going on in another country. Here's my view of situation in Japan. We Japanese were traditionally told there is only one way to be happy - study hard to attend nation-class collage, study harder to top-name company like SONY or HONDA, then work hard to be promoted. It is the way we had produced great products, however it sounds like distant dreams today. Many of those great engineers who have been dedicated their life for the company had been layed off because of economic situation. Those once "great" companies are keep shrinking facilities in Japan, relocating their factories to overseas. For collage graduates, even for top-national rated collages, it is very though to find jobs today. Kids in Japan today have seen all that. They don't believe it is the way to be happy to study hard/work hard anymore. But what is the way to be happy? What is the happiness after all? Everybody seems struggling to find the answer.
Sign in to Reply
Bert22306
12/4/2011 8:48 PM EST
I've read this about the Japanese scene before. So it seems to me, it's not much different from what's happening in the US and in any other developed country now.
In my view, you have to work at what you love, to be happy. You don't choose engineering for any other reason. And furthermore, if you can't earn the salary you think you deserve, it's better to earn less and do what you are passionate about, than earn more at some job you hate.
Of course, this does assume you can find work at all.
To sum it up, while I think mostly the current job situation is temporary in the short term, in the longer term I think we are seeing the leveling of the playing field that globalization causes.
The upward trend on salaries for high paying jobs, in developed countries, is mitigated by globalization. In developing countries, instead, the salaries for engineering and similar jobs are rising appreciably.
Not all bad, in my view. Makes one wonder why the "no global" movement, mostly self-described lefties, is so much against globalization. What's the alternative that they prefer? Prevent the developing countries from ever hoping to catch up?
Sign in to Reply
y_sasaki
12/6/2011 12:08 AM EST
Thank you for your comment, Bert.
No, I don't think we can suppress developing countries. We Japanese ourself have enjoyed our own development throughout 1950-1980s, but we can't keep it forever.
We Japanese have been good at improve things. We did produce high quality products in low cost, however now we have to admit that Koreans and Taiwanese are much better doing that. Days of mighty "Made in Japan" mass production export may be going to end.
Just as you said, the basis of engineering won't be changed - working hard, finding joy in producing better product - however, the definition of "better product" may be changed. We can't be competitive by producing "better and cheaper" products anymore. We need to be more creative and innovative- it is not easy thing, of course.
Sign in to Reply
KB3001
11/30/2011 6:54 AM EST
If this major economic crisis helps us revamp the whole world's financial system, then history will record it as a blessing in disguise. If we miss this opportunity, then we've been had yet again by the world's financiers. So I do not think the dream is over, no. In fact, it can be renewed vigorously if we seize the opportunity: bring back the strong link between hard work/sincerity/ingenuity and reward; strip the financiers of their hold over the economy by abolishing central banks, separating retail banking from investment banking, and abolishing usury... back to basics!
Sign in to Reply
daveb
11/30/2011 7:18 AM EST
The dream is dying because we have let the Socialists remake America. We have ruinous taxation to pay for a government that tries to do everything the communists, socialists, and progressives have been wishing for for years. Our educational institutions and our mass media education have made us all into socialists, because we think the solution is for the government to try harder. The dissenting voices are marginalized, and no serious public discussion can be had, because no one even understands the nature of the problem. The American dream is dying because we have been led to believe that America is a place, but it is really a set of ideas, and we really don't understand today what those ideas even are. How many of us have read the Federalist Papers? Or any of the Founding Fathers' writings? Most of us have no idea how far we are from the Founders' vision of America, the Land of the Free...
Sign in to Reply
ughhhh
12/5/2011 5:26 PM EST
Of course, how could we forget. It's them commies who are to blame for all that' s going wrong.
Sounds a bit like my kids who can always explain why someone else is to blame.
Sign in to Reply
Bob Lacovara
12/7/2011 9:53 AM EST
daveb, you are not all that far off base. There are at least three types of people in the country: producers, consumers and one other type. Most of us play both roles, producing something of value, receiving compensation, and then expending the compensation in the role of consumer. Unfortunately, there are an increasing number of parasites joining the party. They do not work, they tax. They will eventually consume their hosts, if allowed. However, parasites are rewarded in many ways.
Just a thought experijent: imagine a USA in which Congress was elected by random selection. Could this be any worse than the circus we see today? Lobbyists, who depend on long association with the same old crooks, would lose that mechanism. Crony capitalism would decay, as cronies didn't exist. Every two years, a new set of people would be in the hot seat to make sensible decisions. Perhaps, if you did a good job in office, you could remain one more term if the voters wanted it that way. Conservative areas of the country would be governed by conservatives, Berkeley CA could have all the socialists/marxists/loons that it could possibly want. Too bad that "political science" is an oxymoron, or we could try the experiment.
Sign in to Reply
mosspp
12/9/2011 6:29 PM EST
I'd love to try your experiment Bob. I believe that we would see an immediate improvement in the quality of Congressional activity. The current group of clowns is too entrenched in the Washington environment to do anything useful.
And you are in good company. To quote William F. Buckley Jr., “I'd rather entrust the government of the United States to the first 400 people listed in the Boston telephone directory than to the faculty of Harvard University."
Sign in to Reply
Bob Lacovara
12/12/2011 10:21 AM EST
I knew, I knew that my sardonic notion wasn't unique... I just couldn't remember from whom or where I had seen it. But you reminded me perfectly.
The issue is, of course, that if we are willing to trust our fellow citizens to make the grave decision as to who shall govern, then why couldn't they be trusted to do the governing. Hence Buckley's notion, and in derivation, mine.
It would be an interested experiment, no? ;-)
Sign in to Reply
agk
12/1/2011 3:45 AM EST
In history the engineering were almost with America,Germany and USSR. Now also the scenerio continues with America and Germany.maany of the Engineering ideas and dreams and new products,innovations,inventions are contributed from these two places.Where as the large scale production of these applications are else where. in the past 20 years this trend has grown leading to all sorts of current economical issues in America.Because mainly America by selling thier intelligence internationally spread the knowledge and every one country is following their path.So engineering dreams are more challenging and competitive with rest of the world.
Sign in to Reply
glen.herrmannsfeldt
12/1/2011 4:20 AM EST
I probably also believe that our kids will have a lower "standard of living", but I don't believe that is bad.
Recent generations have increased the standard of living at the expense of the environment and unsustainable use of natural resources. Unless population growth levels off fast, the world, and especially the US, will have to switch to more sustainable practices.
If we use an appropriate measure of "standard of living" then it won't be so bad.
Sign in to Reply
MLED
12/1/2011 8:50 AM EST
Look....
Americans, and more specifically engineers, have been sold on a LIE that started in the 80's with ronnie raygun. It's the same economic nonsense sold by the Chicago business school bull$hit artists, like milton friedman, and his sychophantic MBA's. If these guys are so good at managing businesses, why are we in the pickle we are now. Even Dylan in this article reflects the nonsense about the deficit being a big concern. Look folks, name me one country that cut its way to prosperity. You want free market heaven, then go to Somalia where there is little government and little rules. There are a lot of real good economists out there who nail what is going on. Remember engineers, the supply and demand curve. Well, wages create demand. productivity create supply. Wages have flatlined since raygun/friedmanomics and the 80's while productivity has continued exponential growth. They use to move together. You don't have to be a genius to figure out who is screwing who. Lastly, I've encountered a few engineers who are foolish enough to deny evolution. I understand they are not schooled in biology and microbiology; however, this is just nuts. Look, if you want to believe in the supernatural, it's your business; however, don't be surprised when your being taken for a ride by foolish unscientific analysis and don't pretend science can put a good face upon superstition. Remember science and natural phenomenon don't give a damn what us monkey folks BELIEVE!
Sign in to Reply
C VanDorne
12/1/2011 1:41 PM EST
So much idiocy. So little time.
Sign in to Reply
Bert22306
12/1/2011 3:22 PM EST
Indeed, there is a lot wrong with the logic presented in this post.
For one thing, wages create both supply and demand. For another, if productivity goes up, and wages stay flat, that would be the best of all worlds. It means that the standard of living grows for everyone, while inflation remains in check. This is good for everyone, including those on fixed income. Not at all bad, as the MLED implies.
Another point is that if wages stay flat, that doesn't mean that individual incomes aren't rising. It simply means that young people who enter the job market make about the same as similar young people did years ago, and the same holds for those who are about to retire. But those who are about to retire can certainly be earning more than those starting out. Again, nothing at all wrong with that either.
If the work force is relatively stable, the result stable wages and increasing productivity is basically all good.
MLED seems to have forgotten that in the Carter years, both inflation and unemployment were at double digit levels. Now, that's truly a bad state of affairs.
Sign in to Reply
MLED
12/2/2011 1:22 PM EST
You ARE too obviously wrong to be taken seriously. How you can even say flaty wages is good shows a true lack of understanding of the supply and demand equation. How's that flat earth working out for ya?
Sign in to Reply
Bert22306
12/2/2011 3:40 PM EST
It's always best to stay away from mindlessly repeating back politically motivated, "sound good" rhetoric. Especially when it only takes a small amount of scrutiny to see the flaws in it.
If wages go up, and this is accompanied by a lesser increase in productivity, or no productivity improvement at all, you get rampant inflation. Because the increased wages simply drive up the price of products those wages produce. This is very bad.
If wages go up and productivity goes up at exactly the same rate, then people will be able to afford the increased prices. And presumably, since fewer workers are required to create those goods, the rest could be put to creating new businesses. But the ever increasing wages still create inflation, you can't get away from that. So people on fixed incomes will be hurting.
If wages stay stable, and productivity goes up, then you get more bang for the buck, more people will be able to afford more goods, and inflation remains under control.
The problem we have now is that wages are going up slowly, productivity is going up, in theory businesses COULD be hiring the excess labor force to expand their business, but they aren't doing so. Why?
It's so simple. Because they see nothing but looming labor costs, right around the corner, caused by totally misguided government policies.
Sign in to Reply
C VanDorne
12/2/2011 3:53 PM EST
MLED, you are out of your league with Bert, and for that matter everyone else on this trail. You rant Daily KOS lunacy while he explains things thoughtfully. Dude, quit while the wounds are still salvageable. The visuals are horrifying.
Sign in to Reply
Mark.Rackin
12/5/2011 11:57 AM EST
You left out one important factor: our "progressive" tax system! When wages go up, tax receipts increase faster than productivity OR wages REGARDLESS. Hence the leftist desire for MORE inflation. Indexing can help, but a total revamping of our tax system is the only long-term fix. FAIR tax, flat tax, or a hybrid.
Sign in to Reply
przemek
12/9/2011 2:28 PM EST
If something cannot go on forever, it will stop. Think what will happen if productivity increases went on in the long term, while wages were stagnant. Even if prices remained constant, the wage earners would end up becoming smaller and smaller part of the economy, because
the GDP would be geometrically increasing.
A moderate inflation is the only stable solution, and it's not even a controversial view in contemporary economics. In fact, that's what American Dream is all about---that the population of the country as a whole benefits from the economic progress.
Sign in to Reply
EMCgenius
12/1/2011 11:51 AM EST
The 'occupy' movement is not a spontaneous uprising. It is funded and orchestrated behind the scenes. Of the citizens camped out in the parks, some are actual volunteers. The unreported news is that most are paid.
Sign in to Reply
dylan.mcgrath
12/1/2011 12:29 PM EST
@EMCgenius- paid by who? Do you have proof of this?
Sign in to Reply
C VanDorne
12/1/2011 1:39 PM EST
You probably won't find it in main stream reporting but start with the name George Soros and trace it down through the likes of Van Jones and Andy Stern, then down to the lesser known useful idiots. It shouldn't be too hard to make a straight line.
Sign in to Reply
MLED
12/2/2011 1:27 PM EST
Right... and the Koch head brothers are patriots...MY ASS!
Sign in to Reply
C VanDorne
12/2/2011 4:16 PM EST
So let's review your "logic": becasue the Koch brothers, who are rookies by Soros' standards, are trying to act as a counter-weight to Soros' mega-machine of world-wide political and monetary manipulation, which is well documented - ask the Brits, my response to Dylan is illegitimate? He asked an honest question and I gave him an honest answer. And from you we get another tangent. Hmm. I guess it IS true what they say about the truth.
Sign in to Reply
Robotics Developer
12/1/2011 12:44 PM EST
I agree that the conditions are tough and that we must reign in government $pending and SIZE, but I must point out that the American dream isn't dead. Many "may" have given up on the dream but many of us have not. If given half a chance we can do better, we can rebuild, we can work towards fixing the many things out of whack (Gov,Taxes,Special Interests,Entitlements). I am not saying eliminate it all / now! I am saying that we need to change our direction and fix what is clearly broken. It will take some time, it will be hard, some will be worse off for awhile, but in the end we will all be better off.
Sign in to Reply
Nikto
12/1/2011 3:29 PM EST
Compare to the rest of the “civilized” world US is still a land of opportunity more then any place out there. But what's the price? What happens when you let people get as much as they can? Apparently talented healthy and strong prosper (that’s the essence of the American Dream, isn’t it?). Eventually you end up with a handful owning the lion share (isn’t it what we have?). How about the rest who maybe not exactly 99% but they certainly are a majority.
The price as it appears is in the social domain. It would always strike me in the US: outstanding commercial and industrial development, unmatched innovation and best business practices alongside one of the least developed social system in the “civilized” world.
Happily employed professionals all occupied with problem solving and doing well have neither time nor desire to grasp what those Occupy commotion is about, in some cases also so brainwashed that they even consider it wrong never mind “it ain’t exactly clear” what it is. You can go on with the “business as usual” or “we’ve seen worse”, but if it “ain’t exactly clear” to you it does not mean it's not your concern.
Does that invisible hand really do a good job? When we see that enormous disproportion with wealth accumulating only on one end of the table shouldn’t we ask “how much is enough”? Isn’t it obvious that untamed greed is eroding the very American Dream? And if the Dream is only for some with the majority having to struggle, isn’t it too high a price to pay for the Dream? Why should I be proud of my counted fellow citizen having their Dream come true in a shape of $$ when I can not even get a paycheck, try as I may? Only because I live in the same country?
These are all the questions leading to the uncomfortable truth we tend to dodge (just read all the neutral and cautious and downright optimistic comments).
The Occupy people are raising the questions and even though we refuse to understand them it does not mean the questions are not concerning us.
Sign in to Reply
Bob Lacovara
12/7/2011 10:06 AM EST
Nikto, I am puzzled. You make unsupported assertions and follow them to odd destinations. You praise the innovation, business practices and call the US a land of opportunity, but in the same paragraph claim that the US is one of least developed social systems in the world. I can understand the claim that the US is innovative and presents opportunity: Mexicans are not struggling to get into Venezuela. No one breaks down the doors to get into Russia or Turkey. But to what do you negatively compare the social climate in the US? Surely, the US has social problems, but it tends to beat living in Somalia, Iran, China, ... oh, any number of places that are not all that healthy. Is there somewhere that you hold up as a model of social enlightenment? I'd like to know what that place is.
Sign in to Reply
Sheetal.Pandey
12/2/2011 4:57 AM EST
I feel American dream is still alive. Its so honestly put and you can see in the society that its so true.
Sign in to Reply
goafrit
12/2/2011 11:44 AM EST
For me, from Botswana, I think this is still the best place to be. I do not know what they see, but I see hope in AMERICA.
Sign in to Reply
tb1
12/2/2011 7:56 PM EST
Lots of talk radio to ear (bypass the brain) to mouth posts here.
Sign in to Reply
znajit
12/2/2011 8:13 PM EST
I believe this country has the resources, material and willing people if only we start to believe in ourselves that we need to innovate to stay ahead of the curve but share the rewards too. To become richer, we have to make co-workers richer too other wises we will continue to struggle and only answer than is to outsource for cheaper labor
As for the Obama’s administration, they can help raise the spirits around the nation and make it easier for start-up. We have brilliant ideas that are waiting to be cooked but continue to struggle to raise funds and hire talent locally.
The American dream is not dead but most citizens want it without innovation i.e word these days is cheap, no investment and as the top management, want to own it all which is killing the drive.
The silicon valley was built on creativity, large stock handout, hard work & mostly run out of a garage operation with cost cutting as much as possible – success examples are Intel, MS, ROHM, AMD, HP and the list goes on that made even the people down the ground level somewhat richer but more so motivated individuals.
The model today is opposite of that made this country a success with each wanting total ownership. Engineers are treated like the AT&T’s phone installer, like back in England 20yrs ago where I came from. Which makes it very hard to find investors even for ground breaking ideas? So, with little VC capital and older rich Engineers coming back as angel who what to own 99% of the company, there is little or no motivation for a new candidate other than the privilege of having a job.
Totally owner owned company, a typical model in Asian countries, will also eventually breakdown as we evolve the technology and it gets easier for anyone to jump in.
Bottom line, work intelligently and keep mind open for new ideas so we can achieve more in less time.
Sign in to Reply
Saturation
12/4/2011 10:09 AM EST
EE is alive and well but the thriving areas aren't in consumer electronics, which appears to be the heart of EE and is all coming from China. To name a few, military, medical, automobile & network communications are growing so fast, there are jobs a plenty. A problem is most US graduates want to go were they want, not where they are needed. Whereas immigrants are far more flexible and are immediately employed, finding the US dream easy to obtain once the hard to obtain J1 visa is done. Look at the actual federal stats, not the opinions of others, me included:
http://data.bls.gov/oep/noeted/empoptd.jsp
Sign in to Reply
Nicholas C. Lee
12/4/2011 11:10 AM EST
Part 1:
I am pro-America, pro-capitalism and the American dream, so I am deeply concerned about the way the US is sleep-walking into economic defeat.
Historically US Capitalism defeated USSR Communism, not with tanks or bombs, but with economics and by undermining their social structure by instilling greed for the western lifestyle amongst their populous. Sadly for the Russians, they ended up with a mafia government rather than a democracy, but at least the US came out on top.
The new economic world-war is between US Capitalism and Chinese Communism, and so far China is winning.
China knows they are at war and they have learned the lessons from the USSR’s defeat. I am not even sure that the average US citizen has even noticed that they are at war, despite the number of casualties (aka unemployed people) around them.
The Chinese can make long-term economic battle plans that western democracies cannot do due to their regular changes in elected leadership. They can undercut US manufactured good prices by brutally oppressing their workers. Now China is using its financial might to buy up bankrupt US companies at rock-bottom prices. Soon the US trade deficit will reach unsustainable levels and then China will be in a position to dictate American policy. Once the US industry and major financial institutions are all owned by China, China will then be left as the world’s only superpower. America will be left as just a political puppet-state of China, populated with lazy and badly educated citizens who will be viewed by their Chinese masters with the kind of distain that Americans all-too-often currently reserve for Mexicans.
Sign in to Reply
Nicholas C. Lee
12/4/2011 11:10 AM EST
Part 2:
It’s not quite too late. America could still fight back if its citizens woke-up. In fact it is actually really rather simple, all ordinary Americans need to do to win is:
1) Stop blaming Obama, the banks or anyone else for their economic misery and recognise that Chinese Communism is the economic enemy, and that it is their own purchasing habits that are to blame for destroying the American economy.
2) Check the label on everything you buy to see what country it was made in and simply don’t buy goods that say “Made in China”
3) Boycott (or refuse to buy shares-in) companies who deal-with and import Communist-made products and components.
4) Buy goods made in American from American made components.
5) Start manufacturing companies and export your American made goods.
6) Educate your children properly in STEM subjects and in business economics.
The government cannot do all of this for you as imposing unilateral trade sanctions on China would not be legal. There needs to be groundswell of resentment against communism amongst the American citizens in order to make it work.
If American civilisation falls then it will only have its own citizens to blame.
Sign in to Reply
TFC-SD
12/5/2011 12:21 AM EST
Remember when the American Dream was not a dream? ;-)
Sign in to Reply
Code Monkey
12/6/2011 11:29 AM EST
You can watch George Carlin weigh in on this topic on Youtube: "The owners of this country know the truth: It's called the American dream because you have to be asleep to believe it." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q
Sign in to Reply
MLED
12/8/2011 8:47 AM EST
I've posted this same one on other sites. It's really funny how most Americans, especially the right wingnuts, willingly bend over backwards to get the big kahuna from their corporate masters!
Sign in to Reply
Bert22306
12/9/2011 3:45 PM EST
"If something cannot go on forever, it will stop. Think what will happen if productivity increases went on in the long term, while wages were stagnant."
I think you will find, most modern economists agree that if we don't maintain a reasonable growth in productivity, and that means on the order of more than 2 percent per year, inflation will rise, real incomes will decline, and the economy will stagnate.
It's not "a moderate inflation" that these economists are calling for, as much as "moderate productivity increase."
The idea that wage increase by itself would lead to greater wealth, in a macroeconomic sense, is simply not supported by fact. Productivity has been increasing, in terms of long term trend, with plenty of hiccups along the way, ever since the Industrial Revolution. There's no reason why this long term trend can't be maintained.
Sign in to Reply