Ultimate Screw-ups
Comment
FWB
Some engineering took some doing. A rugby feed from UK to New Zealand first time ...
Diseased
Sometime back, more years than I care to consider, I was a young engineer part ...
Warning: Turn down gain before switching input
Charles Glorioso
10/6/2010 12:05 AM EDT
Years ago I worked for a large manufacturer that was a leader in designing and building teletypewriters. For the younger set, a teletypewriter had a keyboard and printer with no computer between them. It had serial input/output capabilities allowing it to communicate with remote similar machines. One large user of such machines was Western Union for their telegraph service.
At the time of this story, these units were mostly mechanical plus a few switches, solenoids and relays; no electronics. They were mostly assembled from parts punched out of steel. Data moved into and out of them at an astounding 10 characters per second.
Many of this company’s products were used by the government and military, so we had some impressive test equipment to verify that the products would work over the needed environmental range. For instance, there was a walk-in chamber capable of greater than 120F at greater than 95% humidity, another capable of simulating an elevation of 30,000 ft. (Note: All numbers are subject to poor memory.)
Management was so proud of the facilities that they held an annual open house for employees and family.
One year, they added a shake table to the test equipment facility and wanted to showcase it at the open house. Its purpose was to vibration-test products over a frequency range from 0 to 5000 Hz. For example, you might want to test your product to make sure that it didn’t rattle apart when you installed it in an airplane and the engines created a beat note at say 10 hz.
If I remember correctly, the shake table was built by a company then called Ling-Temco-Vought. It consisted of an electronic amplifier and a loudspeaker-like voice coil, and it was big. The final amplifier, which was visible through a window in the cabinet, consisted of two vacuum tubes each about the size of a 5-gallon bottled water tank. These were air cooled, and glowed dull red-orange in operation. The voice coil looked like a large kettle drum. It was five or six feet in diameter, water cooled and capable of shaking a load on the order of 100 pounds that sat on the “drum” surface.
For the open house, someone decided to have the shake table introduce itself to the visitors as part of the demonstration. It could do this since the speaker assembly made audible sounds as it shook the payload. They also decided that the unit under test for the demonstration should be a brand new teletypewriter that was under development.
This "new" product was an ASR-33, pictured here:
The shake table had two sources of test frequencies. An internal oscillator could be used to provide the needed 0-5000 Hz at controllable amplitude. There was also an input jack allowing an external source of oscillation.
For the demo, a tape recorder was hooked to this external input with the recording, “I am the Ling-Temco-Vought model xxxx and I test …………” After the tape recording introduced the shake table, the operator was to switch the input to the internal oscillator, which would run through a pre-programmed frequency profile. Of course, this all worked well in rehearsals. On the evening of the open house, with about 50 people gathered around, the operator started up the shake table and the tape recorder. The Ling-Temco-Vought successfully introduced itself. Then the operator threw the switch to activate the internal oscillator.
However, he forgot to turn down the gain control before he did that. You know that little static pop that happens when you switch from one audio source to another? Magnify that by, oh quite a bit, and you can probably visualize what happened: The shake table voice coil gave a mighty pop, and the teletypewriter which was operating during the demo was destroyed. Steel parts were actually launched through the plastic cover, and the cover was broken free from the base of the unit. It was very impressive, and needless to say, the demo was finished for the evening.
The next day a warning sign appeared on the front panel: “Turn gain down before switching input.”
Charles Glorioso has a BSEE from Purdue and an MSEE from the Illinois Institute of Technology. He has over 40 years experience in electronics design and management for industrial and consumer products.
|
|
|
|
|
mtripoli
10/6/2010 1:58 PM EDT
I remember those teletypes; we had one for our "computer class" in junior high-school (BASIC). It was connected to the "mainframe" in Boston, MA. We had to write our program out on paper (!), verify it by hand, then enter it (type it in) line by line. You had to wait in between lines for an acknowledgement before entering the next line. Once it was entered it was saved to punch tape. The next day you could go pick up the results of the run. And people complain about Windows...
Sign in to Reply
Rick_Hille
10/6/2010 2:32 PM EDT
The lesson here should stike a chord with amp designers/builders. The "click" of switching to a different signal source with potentially different DC offset can potentially destroy a speaker (or speakers) on a high power rig. This could be rather expensive when restoring vintage audio gear.
Sign in to Reply
Duane Benson
10/6/2010 4:58 PM EDT
The lesson also holds for more modern devices as well. Take a microcontroller-driven motor control. If you're designing the firmware on the driver board, you can assume that it will always be powered up properly, with enough gradation to prevent giant power spikes. Then when someone drives it and accidentally sends control signals from zero to 100% in one processor machine cycle, it will spike and blow or just lurch off at full power risking mechanical damage.
Alternately, you can build in protection schemes that will assume that someone might just "forget to turn the gain down" when powering on.
Sign in to Reply
Frank Eory
10/7/2010 6:08 PM EDT
How nice that now we can afford to make automatic anti-click/pop control a common feature in most modern audio systems -- even those that can't destroy a teletype machine!
Sign in to Reply
skomen
10/8/2010 4:24 PM EDT
My uncle worked for the company, I remember going to one of those open houses when I was 10-12 years old, unfortunately I missed the one with the incident in this story but remembered playing with the equipment and having what I typed pop up across the room, great stuff at that age (the incident would have been more fun). Thank you for the memory.
Sign in to Reply
K6TVM
10/11/2010 2:41 PM EDT
Thos ole shaker suystems packed a real punch if you weren't careful. I remember one test on a rack frame for a microwave system - the test went up in frequency until there was an ear-splitting screech and the frame came apart all over the lab. The operator's comment to the mechanical designer was, "Well, now you know."
And if your nostalgia instinct is strong enough, I have an ASR-33 in my garage - they're remarkably difficult to give away! But my daughter learned to write on it, so it had a second life.
John Amos
Sign in to Reply
Robert.Reavis
10/11/2010 3:27 PM EDT
I also had an ASR-33 and when I tried to give it away the response came back "What's that?" Before the days of politically correct garbage disposal, I just set it out on the curb next to the garbage can and it was taken away to the dump.
Sign in to Reply
Itinerant Engineer
10/12/2010 6:07 PM EDT
My father was a communicator in Civil Air Patrol (CAP), the USAF's poor relation, which always had to make do with hand-me-down equipment. Over the years, we had several TTYs in the basement; their racket was a familiar, even comforting sound.
Since the machines had attached punched tape readers, Dad created several loops of tape with routine message headers, etc., with the drive holes cut out at points where he would insert message-specific information.
When the machines wore out beyond repair, upon decommissioning, he'd give them to me to tear apart. I had a wonderful collection of micro-switches and other state-of-the-era parts.
Lance ==)--------------
Sign in to Reply
CharlesGlorioso
10/13/2010 12:26 PM EDT
All great comments about ASR33 Teletypes, and early computer usage of them. (By the way "Teletype" is a registered trademark of the company by that name. Like Kleenex, they had such a high market share that they almost lost their trademark due to common usage.)
Those Model 33 devices were designed for light duty usage in Telex and TWX (Telegram) usage. But they hit the market at exactly the right time for use in the first time sharing computers, as described by Mtripoli. As a result they were a much more successful (profitable) product than planned.
Charles
Sign in to Reply
NevadaDave
10/13/2010 3:03 PM EDT
Oh, man! I remember using the old mechanical Teletype machines when I was in the USCG. It may be apocryphal, but when we were in tech school, we were told that the designer of the model then in common use (I don't remember the number maybe the 23?) was a mechanical genius who eventually committed suicide. Watching those machines work was absolutely fascinating, and makes me even more appreciative of modern comm devices. I also remember acoustic-coupled 110 baud ASR33 machines talking to our IBM 370 many years ago. Now I complain if my connect speeds are lower than 1.5 mbit!
Sign in to Reply
Stargzer
11/24/2010 6:59 PM EST
There once was a Star Trek game in BASIC that depended on the Model 33's timing of the auto carriage return / line feed. The PRINT statement centered the title words "S T A R T R E K" but left out one of the characters, printing it as the 73rd character of the 72-character line. If the ASR was set up for auto carriage return, it did a return before a line feed, and the missing character was printed as the print head returned, before the line feed (the original bi-directional printer!). Some software was set up to put out two CRs before the LF to make sure the print head was all the way back to the left.
If the auto carriage return was not set, all the characters after 72 piled up on the 72nd character.
Sign in to Reply
NevadaDave
10/13/2010 3:17 PM EDT
Actually, looking at some old pics now that my interest has been piqued, I think we used the Model 28 back in the late '60's/early '70's when I was in the Guard.
Sign in to Reply
daveismissing
10/14/2010 9:19 AM EDT
'28s and '29s? were the Cadillac designs.Indestructible.
32's (5 level) and 33's (8 level) were brilliant from a low cost design POV. Fresh out of electronics curriculum I spent my first 6 months with the local "Telex" carrier R&R'ing machines, Freon baths, re-grease, disassemble clutches, checking clearances, replacing contacts.
Feeler gauges and a voltmeter!
33s pretty much operated at their mechanical limits, fussier that 32's IIRC.
Sign in to Reply
WKetel
10/16/2010 9:57 PM EDT
I didn't get to play with the ASR, but I certainly had to run quite a few shake tests on vehicle bodies and parts of cars, all using those old tube type amplifiers. They were indeed very impressive, and they could produce fast transients, with far more than their rated output, for two or three seconds, which was plenty of time to do a whole lot of damage. So we would start with the gain control at minimum every time. Of course, some of the testing was done with a feedback controller, either holding constant force with a force sensor in the drive link, or with constant velocity, using a displacement sensor, and recording the force, which drops as resonance is approached. That can be exciting, I have seen a pickup truck broken just by driving it at the resonant frequency for a few minutes. It was quite a show.
Sign in to Reply
Butch Weber
10/28/2010 4:09 PM EDT
This brings back many fond and not so fond memories. I hated being a teletype repairman in the US Navy, but I like typing on them. I was a Radioman and we used mostly the model 28s. When I got out of the Navy I found an old Kleinschmidt table top teletypewriter. It was something to behold. I used it on Ham Radio for many years before going electronic. What Fun!
Sign in to Reply
Diseased
11/24/2010 10:04 PM EST
Sometime back, more years than I care to consider, I was a young engineer part of a team developing a sonobouy receiver for the Navy's S3A aircraft. The specifications were tight enough that we had an interesting time with the crystal filter designs. By the end of the project these and the entire RF chain were my sole responsibility. I'd managed to specify some rather nice filters and they worked nicely.
To prove the filters I'd developed a nice test board and some procedures that got me past some of the limitations of the then current spectrum analyzers that plagued anyone without a tracking signal generator. So we really had good equipment to deliver to the Navy.
So we built the prototype. Somewhat predictably for the era we found a problem or two and generated tiny work arounds for them. Then we ran preliminary tests and it worked like a champ.
Finally we entered the qual testing phase. This involved a large shake table, LTV I believe. We sailed through the shock and vibration tests. Unfortunately these were not the last tests to be run on that ill fated receiver. The test technician at the shake table facility accidentally pulled the signal source before cutting power. The predictable rather extreme shock rather rattled the receiver's brains. Some of the 31 receivers failed on the spot. So I had to pull all the boards and find the good ones and replace the bad ones. The failures often were not "instantaneous", which if memory serves led to replacing ALL the boards. I watched one fail under retest. It looked fine one moment and showed garbage moments later as another crystal departed from one of its mounting leads.
This would have been late in the ASR33 era (about 1970). So I guess the shake table people took a long time to learn about click and pop filters. I feel your pain, Charles.
{^_^}
Sign in to Reply
FWB
11/25/2010 9:53 AM EST
Some engineering took some doing. A rugby feed from UK to New Zealand first time had the players followed some distance by the color of their uniform. Group delay equalizers were needed. The feed from the US had to go through a Rank analog TV standards converter which took 3 racks and used crystal delay lines for interpolation. Both are probably no longer documented designs, but they are how we got to where we are now.
Sign in to Reply