News & Analysis

Fake batteries blow up in the industry's face

Rick Merritt

9/20/2004 9:00 AM EDT

San Francisco — The disturbing image of exploding cell phones and incendiary notebook computers is sending shivers down the spines of consumer electronics OEMs and the chip makers that serve them. Rising reports of incidents in which counterfeit batteries have overheated, caught fire or blown up are dogging a portable-systems industry caught between the slow pace of battery technology and the quick step of new features at ever-lower costs.

A handful of chip makers are building security schemes into their next-generation power ICs to help stem a problem that could, manufacturers fear, undermine consumer confidence and affect sales, or possibly even lead to regulatory action. "You could shut down a whole freaking industry here," said Dave Heacock, vice president of portable power management for Texas Instruments Inc. (Dallas).

TI and chip makers Maxim Integrated Products Inc. (Sunnyvale, Calif.) and Microchip Technology Inc. (Chandler, Ariz.) are building strong authentication into their battery charger or battery management ICs to prevent their use in phony battery packs.

No one knows the full scope of the battery piracy problem, but in late June the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) put out its first recall of counterfeits — about 50,000 Verizon Wireless cell phones with fake LG Electronics batteries (see www.cpsc.gov/CPSCPUB/PREREL/prhtml04/04559.html). Verizon received 18 reports of injuries or property damage from the batteries, including a teenager who had a phone explode in his pocket and a woman who had a car accident when her handset blew up.

The only other U.S. cell phone battery recall this year was of 140,000 legitimate batteries made in China by Coslight International Group of Hong Kong for the Kyocera 7135 smart phone. Kyocera had four battery failure reports on the product, including one "minor burn" (see www.cpsc.gov/CPSCPUB/PREREL/prhtml04/04068.html).

"No one has accurate data on this because the companies are not willing to talk about it," said Brian Barnett, managing director of Tiax LLC, a battery consulting firm. "But when you ask people in the industry, they generally say they are seeing more incidents, and it's a concern."

As chairman of an advisory board for the Portable Power Conference here last week, Barnett tried unsuccessfully to get people to speak on some of the safety issues. "It's extremely hard to get people to talk about this topic," he said.

Indeed, the reported battery failures are "the tip of the iceberg," said Stuart Lipoff, a battery consultant with IP Action Partners (Newton, Mass.). "Most of the cases are under gag orders or settle out of court."

Persistent problems
Today's mainstream lithium-ion batteries went through years of development and testing to ensure the volatile lithium they contain was safe in notebook computers, PDAs and cell phones. Nevertheless, failures and recalls continue to nag the portable sector and are on the rise in handsets.

Stung by several reports of catastrophic battery failures late last year, Nokia pointed a finger at counterfeit batteries and put up information on its Web site to help consumers identify fake battery packs (see www.nokia.com/nokia/0,,49192,00.html). More than 5 million counterfeit batteries were seized and destroyed worldwide last year, Nokia said in a statement.

"The cell phone problem is a growing one," said a spokesman for the CPSC in Washington. That individual said the government agency has had an ongoing investigation into counterfeit batteries for "a few months."

Simple product defects account for many of the failures. Industry watchers also point to competitive pressures to add new features, yet make systems smaller and cheaper. Lately, new low-cost battery sources — particularly in China — are taking a share of the blame, as with the recalled Kyocera batteries.

Nor is the problem confined to cell phones. "The computer industry ships 47 million notebooks a year, and the problems are in the parts per million," said John Wozniak, a power-management specialist in Hewlett-Packard Co.'s notebook group. But Tom Hildner, a technology strategist on power issues in IBM Corp.'s PC group, said he thought the problem was less widespread in notebooks than in cell phones, where users more frequently change batteries.

Battery counterfeiters are most prevalent in South America, South Africa and India, said Heacock of TI. Companies disassemble large battery packs into their component cells to make several smaller packs out of them, selling at retail or over the Web. "The next thing you know these cells are going into places they were never designed for," Heacock said.

However, Heacock also leveled blame at OEMs that, without testing, strip out of their designs "a simple temperature sensor that costs less than 10 cents but would trigger a safe mode to stop charging, turn on a power amplifier and take steps to make sure you have no catastrophic failures — all in the relentless pursuit of lower costs."

Indeed, even top-tier companies are not above taking a step backward in battery technology to cut costs. Wozniak of HP said that Dell Computer now sells its Inspirion notebook with an optional nickel-metal-hydride battery to hit a lower price point. HP is testing a similar option it may offer before the end of the year, he said.

The NiMH battery offers about 15 to 20 percent less capacity, but also costs about 20 percent less than the lithium-ion model. "It's about $8 a pack less," said Wozniak.

End users can be just as parsimonious when it comes to paying for battery technology. For instance, they didn't start buying batteries with the latest 2.4-amp-hour densities until the packs came down to price parity with previous-generation packs. "These cells have been around for more than a year, and we still have on hand half of what we originally bought," said Wozniak.

Chip makers are taking separate roads to tackle the counterfeiting problem, but all the routes promise negligible cost increases.

"For the most part they are using simple challenge/response mechanisms with something like 64-bit encryption," said Wozniak of HP. "Sony is doing something in its own batteries. Maxim has a whole road map of chips for this, and Microchip will handle it in software in its next-generation fuel-gauge ICs."

Chips are already making their way to market, he said. "There are chips becoming available for notebooks. There's been a lot of activity since these incidents with handhelds."

Generally the software approaches are the lowest in cost but easiest to compromise, and the hardware approaches more costly but tougher to crack. "They all work OK, but you have to weigh the costs against the level of security you want," said Hildner of IBM. "We would like to see an industry standard if this is something everyone is going to do, but we also want to differentiate ourselves in this area, and I can see potential for that."

TI hopes to tap into that desire for customization with a "rolling key" approach it will implement in hardware and software across a range of products using both one- and two-wire buses.

"We've made it flexible enough that each OEM can have their own secret sauce with some control over how they roll it out," said Heacock. "You won't even see the costs in a notebook computer, but in an entry-level cell phone it might costs 30 cents."

The Dallas Semiconductor division of Maxim is already sampling its 2703, a new device that uses the SHA-1 hashing algorithm to authenticate, over a single wire, a key on a battery pack of any portable system. The chip, which will cost 35 cents and be in production by the end of the year, is the first of a line of planned products in this area.

"We have customers making digital cameras, cell phones and notebooks who want to use this. It's a hot topic today," said Gene Armstrong, an executive director who oversees battery and thermal-management products for the company. "When Nokia has phones blowing up on people and blaming it on counterfeit batteries, it gets people's attention."





willb

8/19/2010 6:35 PM EDT

The high temperature detection functionality is an excellent idea. That seems like cheap insurance, not just against counterfeit batteries, but against the occasional faulty genuine battery, too.

However, keying genuine batteries in order to reject afermarket replacements is a very bad idea for consumers. Many aftermarket replacements may be perfectly safe and cheaper alternatives to the approved replacement item. I, for one, will avoid buying electronic items that leave me no options for maintenance.

Sincerely,
Will Bain

Sign in to Reply



Frank Eory

8/19/2010 7:51 PM EDT

Will, I have to disagree on the aftermarket comment. I like to save a buck as much as anyone, but we're talking about something that could injure or kill someone. OEM battery packs have safety features and quality standards that are lacking in the counterfeits -- there is a reason those counterfeits sell for so much less than the OEM version.


Like that guy quoted in the article said, reported cases are just the tip of the iceberg and lots of lawsuits are under gag order or settle out of court. It seems grossly unfair that a company should have to pay a big settlement for something that was beyond their control -- a consumer using an unapproved battery pack in their cellphone or notebook.


Cell phone manufacturers and their service provider partners have the right to protect themselves from lawsuits for injuries that are the result of misuse of the product. In fact, they have an obligation to protect consumers from their own behavior, if such behavior (buying a cheap battery) can result in injury or death.

If manufacturers don't protect consumers from themselves, the government might be tempted to enact new regulations to do it for them.


Of course there is always the Apple approach -- make the battery an irreplaceable part of the product. When your battery no longer holds enough charge, it's time to get a new phone. I think I prefer the option to replace the battery with another OEM battery that the phone recognizes as legitimate...and safe for use.

Sign in to Reply



WKetel

9/3/2010 6:08 PM EDT

How about stopping a moment and considering WHY folks would go with a battery from an after-market source. Mostly, it is because the OEM replacement battery is priced high enough to make a user consider replacing the whole device. Does a $120 replacement battery pack for a $400 laptop computer make sense? How about the replacement cell phone battery for $45, when the whole phone cost me $75? So from the very start we have the price set at a level high enough to be a real attention-getter, and then the manufacturers add in some secret ID chip so that the product will not work with the replacement after-market battery, and they raise the price of the OEM part another $50. If they would be honest about it, they would make the battery non-replaceable and tell folks that when the original battery failed they had to replace the whole thing. This would greatly increase the amount of electronic waste as well as profits. And it would get rid of the after-market replacement battery problem. Of course, we might see some resistance to throwing away a $399 smartphone after a few months.

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Featured Job On
Scroll for More Jobs

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)